Draft Revocable Living Trust Agreement

---
name: draft-revocable-living-trust-agreement
task_id: trusts-estates-private-client/draft-revocable-living-trust-agreement
description: Closes the gap where agents draft generic revocable trust agreements without resolving cross-document conflicts, flagging coordination issues for retirement and deferred compensation beneficiary designations, and addressing distribution conditions that raise public policy or tax concerns.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---

# Skill: Draft Revocable Living Trust Agreement

## 1. Subject-matter triage (only if applicable)

- Treat the trust agreement as the primary deliverable and the issues memo as secondary; do not let the memo substitute for a complete operative trust instrument.
- First map the settlor, spouse, children, stepchildren, fiduciaries, and all beneficiary classes, then reconcile any conflicting statements across intake materials, follow-up correspondence, and asset summaries before drafting.
- Separate assets that can be titled to the trust from assets that pass by beneficiary designation, contract, or plan document; do not assume every listed asset can be funded directly.
- If the source set includes multiple family branches or conditional share concepts, enumerate each branch and each condition before drafting distribution provisions.

## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting

- Drafting a generic revocable trust that ignores whether a retirement asset must remain outside the trust and be coordinated instead through beneficiary designation language.
- Using an overbroad spendthrift clause that purports to shield the settlor’s own lifetime interest rather than limiting protection to beneficiary interests after the trust becomes irrevocable.
- Adding sobriety, treatment, or testing-based distribution conditions without addressing whether the condition is defensible under governing trust law and public policy.
- Missing coordination between deferred compensation or similar contractual death benefits and the trust’s distribution scheme, leaving a beneficiary-designation gap.
- Omitting tax apportionment language for estate tax attributable to non-probate assets that may fall outside the trust but still affect the trust estate.
- Failing to align the trust with a pour-over will, beneficiary designations, and any separate contractual or plan-based transfer mechanics.
- Drafting a no-contest clause without the governing-law carveout or probable-cause limitation required in many jurisdictions.
- Leaving post-death administration instructions vague where the trust uses sub-trusts, age-based stages, or condition-based distributions.

## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply

- Revocable trust basics: during the settlor’s life, the trust is typically revocable and amendable, and the settlor often serves as trustee; at death, the trust becomes irrevocable and governs the funded estate under the governing trust statute and instrument terms.
- Spendthrift doctrine: spendthrift protection generally applies to beneficiary interests in an irrevocable trust phase, not to the settlor’s retained interest in a self-settled revocable trust; draft accordingly under the governing trust code.
- Retirement and designated-beneficiary assets: qualified retirement plans, IRAs, life insurance, and deferred compensation arrangements often pass by beneficiary designation or plan terms rather than by direct trust funding; coordinate with the controlling plan document and beneficiary form.
- Trust qualification and timing rules: where a trust is named as beneficiary of a retirement-type asset, distribution timing may depend on trust qualification and the plan’s governing rules; state the timing issue in the memo rather than hard-coding assumptions into the trust.
- Distribution conditions: treatment-compliance or sobriety conditions should be drafted with objective, administrable benchmarks and references to licensed treatment or monitoring programs, mindful of public policy and enforceability limits under governing state law.
- No-contest clauses: enforceability is jurisdiction-specific; where allowed, include a probable-cause exception and tie the clause to the governing state’s trust law.
- Tax apportionment: the instrument should state how estate tax and related transfer taxes are borne when non-probate assets or outside designations contribute to the taxable estate.
- Trustee powers and administration: include standard powers, successor trustee mechanics, fiduciary accounting, allocation of receipts and expenses, and investment authority consistent with the governing trust statute.
- Governing authority: cite the specific governing statute, rule, or contract provision identified in the source documents when available; if not, cite the controlling authority from generally accepted trust and estates practice.

## 4. Analytical scaffolds

1. Build a source map of all people, assets, beneficiary designations, and distribution instructions; resolve internal inconsistencies before drafting operative language.
2. For each asset or benefit stream, classify the transfer mechanism: trust funding, beneficiary designation, contractual payout, or separate non-trust administration.
3. For each family branch or beneficiary class, identify whether the intended gift is outright, in trust, staged over time, subject to conditions, or contingent on an event.
4. Draft the trust’s core architecture: revocability, amendment, incapacity management, trustee succession, funding, dispositive scheme, and post-death administration.
5. Draft sub-trusts or continuing trusts with clear funding source, trustee, distribution standard, termination trigger, and fallback disposition.
6. Where the draft includes conditional distributions, convert subjective or intrusive concepts into objective administration standards where possible, and flag any remaining public-policy risk in the memo.
7. Where an asset cannot pass through the trust directly, add coordination language and explain the required beneficiary-designation or plan-document action in the memo.
8. Draft spendthrift and no-contest provisions narrowly, matching them to the trust’s irrevocable phase and the governing-law constraints.
9. Include tax apportionment and administrative expense allocation language that addresses both probate and non-probate assets.
10. In the issues memo, identify each ambiguity, explain why it matters, and propose a concrete drafting resolution or client decision point.

## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships (only if applicable)

- The pour-over will, trust agreement, and beneficiary designations must operate as one estate plan; any mismatch can defeat the intended post-death allocation.
- Assets that pass outside the trust may still affect the trust through tax apportionment, liquidity needs, and residue funding; reflect those interactions expressly.
- If the plan uses successive trust stages, each stage should specify when it begins, what funds it receives, how distributions are made, and when it terminates.
- If the trust conditions distributions on conduct or treatment participation, distinguish lifetime administration from post-death beneficiary administration and avoid applying beneficiary restrictions to the settlor’s retained rights.
- If retirement or deferred compensation benefits are payable at death, consider the interaction among the designation, the trust’s dispositive terms, and any timing rules imposed by the governing instrument or law.

## 6. Output structure conventions

- Produce two documents: a completed revocable living trust agreement and a drafting issues memorandum.
- Trust agreement convention: recitals; definitions; revocation and amendment; settlor powers and incapacity management; trustee succession; funding and omitted property; administration during settlor’s life; post-death dispositive provisions; trustee powers; spendthrift; no-contest; tax apportionment; miscellaneous boilerplate.
- Draft the trust as operative language, not as commentary, and keep internal cross-references consistent.
- Issues memo convention: begin with a short statement of scope and governing assumptions; then use numbered issues, each with a concise issue label, source basis, legal significance, and recommended resolution.
- For each memo issue, state the controlling authority or practice principle supporting the recommendation, and identify any open item that requires client confirmation or counsel judgment.
- End the memo with a Recommended Actions section listing the next drafting or client-response steps, each in imperative form with the responsible person and a timing anchor tied to the document workflow.
- When multiple assets, beneficiaries, or conditions are present, organize the trust and memo so each distinct item is addressed separately rather than in a blended summary.