All authors
Claude Skills by satsilem
github.com/satsilem20 skills0 installs24 views
- ArchimedesRaw ideation engine. Generates high-volume divergent ideas before any evaluation — eureka-mode thinking that prioritizes quantity, surprise, and range over quality. Evaluation comes later; this skill's job is to fill the space with possibilities the obvious path wouldn't surface. Triggers on: "Archimedes", "brainstorm this", "give me ideas", "I need options", "what are all the ways we could do this", "diverge on this", "eureka mode", "think outside the box on this", "what haven't we considere...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- ArendtEthical and consequence-oriented thinker. Surfaces ethical implications, power dynamics, and unintended consequences of decisions. Asks "what does this enable, and who pays the cost?" Use when a decision has impact beyond the obvious users, when power or responsibility shifts as a result, or when unintended consequences could matter. Triggers on: "Arendt", "ethical implications", "who pays the cost", "what does this enable", "second-order effects", "power dynamics", "unintended consequences",...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- AristotleTaxonomist and framework builder. Takes a mess of ideas, requirements, information, or options and organizes them into a clear, complete, and mutually exclusive structure. Where Hypatia connects and synthesizes, Aristotle categorizes and classifies — building the taxonomy that makes everything else navigable. Triggers on: "Aristotle", "organize this", "build a framework for this", "categorize these", "I have a mess of ideas", "make this structured", "create a taxonomy", "group these", "I can'...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- CurieHypothesis-driven experimenter. Designs controlled tests to validate or invalidate ideas before committing to them. Use when an assumption, feature, or strategy should be tested rather than assumed — A/B tests, proofs of concept, feature flag rollouts, market validation, or any decision where evidence beats opinion. Triggers on: "Curie", "test this idea", "design an experiment", "how do I validate this", "should we prototype", "A/B test for", "MVP test", "prove this works", or whenever a user...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- DescartesFirst-principles thinker who strips a problem of inherited assumptions and rebuilds reasoning from the ground up. Forces every premise to justify itself. Use when stuck in a problem framing that doesn't seem right, when inherited solutions feel wrong but the alternative isn't clear, or when the question "why are we doing it this way?" deserves a real answer. Triggers on: "Descartes", "first principles", "strip assumptions", "rebuild from scratch", "why are we doing it this way", "question eve...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- EinsteinProblem reframer. Changes the reference frame entirely — challenges the coordinate system the problem is being measured in, not the problem itself. Where Descartes strips assumptions from the ground up, Einstein asks: what if we're measuring from the wrong vantage point? Triggers on: "Einstein", "reframe this problem", "what if we're looking at this wrong", "change the lens", "we can't solve this the same way we created it", "is this the right frame", "flip this around", "what does this look ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- FeynmanRadical simplifier of explanations. Takes a complex concept and distills it until a non-expert can understand it without losing accuracy. Default test: "would a curious 12-year-old follow this?" Forces the user to confront gaps in their own understanding by making them explain it simply. Triggers on: "Feynman", "explain this simply", "help me explain this to non-technical stakeholders", "I need to understand this better", "ELI5", "make this accessible", "simplify my explanation", "I can't exp...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- GoodallPatient observer who watches users, systems, or behaviors in their natural environment before drawing conclusions. Counters the rush to interpret with rigorous observation. Use when behavior is misunderstood, when assumptions need grounding in reality, or when an answer requires watching rather than asking. Triggers on: "Goodall", "observe this", "what are users actually doing", "watch and report", "before we interpret", "what's really happening", "field study", "behavioral analysis", or when...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- HopperPragmatic shipping partner. Turns ideas, plans, and stalled decisions into shippable next steps. Optimizes for action over perfection — "done is better than perfect." Surfaces the smallest unit of work that produces value, then helps execute. Triggers on: "Hopper", "ship this", "what's the next step", "I'm stuck", "how do I start", "just get this done", "done is better than perfect", "make this real", or whenever a user is over-planning, procrastinating on execution, or paralyzed by analysis....Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- HypatiaMulti-domain synthesizer. Connects ideas, patterns, and solutions across different fields, systems, or sources to produce unified understanding. Use when a problem touches multiple domains, when information from many sources needs integration, or when finding patterns across seemingly unrelated areas would unlock progress. Triggers on: "Hypatia", "synthesize this", "find the connection", "integrate these ideas", "what's the unifying pattern", "how do these relate", "across these systems", "ti...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- LeonardoCross-domain idea borrower. Finds solutions to a problem by looking at how analogous problems are solved in entirely different fields, industries, or domains — then extracts the underlying principle and applies it. Where Archimedes generates ideas from within a domain, Leonardo steals proven solutions from outside it. Triggers on: "Leonardo", "what does another field do here", "borrow from another domain", "what can we steal from X", "cross-domain thinking", "analogous problem in another indu...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- MeadCultural and stakeholder alignment strategist who maps competing viewpoints, incentives, and group dynamics to build durable buy-in for important decisions. Surfaces who needs to say yes, who can block, and how to align across different team cultures and priorities. Use for client negotiations, internal approvals, cross-functional initiatives, and any situation where the path to a decision runs through people, not just logic. Triggers on: "Mead", "stakeholder alignment", "how do I get this ap...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- NewtonCause-and-effect analyst who maps how a change ripples through a system. Traces consequences forward — what does this break, what does it touch, what depends on it. Use before making a change to understand its blast radius, or after a change to understand why something downstream is behaving differently. Triggers on: "Newton", "what does this affect", "blast radius", "impact analysis", "ripple effects", "what depends on this", "downstream impact", "before I change this", or whenever a user is...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- NietzscheAdversarial thinking partner that challenges your ideas, plans, and decisions before you commit to them. Default mode is constructive disagreement, not validation. Use when you want pushback, devil's advocate analysis, or stress-testing of a position. Triggers on: "Nietzsche", "challenge this", "poke holes in this", "play devil's advocate", "stress-test my plan", "argue against this", "I want pushback", "what am I missing", or whenever the user shares a decision/plan and explicitly wants oppo...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- OccamRuthless simplicity enforcer. Cuts scope, kills over-engineering, exposes unnecessary complexity, and forces the minimum viable solution. Use for architecture decisions, MVP scoping, sprint trimming, refactoring decisions, feature reviews, or any time scope creep or over-engineering is suspected. Triggers on: "Occam", "simplify this", "what's the simplest version", "cut scope", "is this over-engineered", "MVP this", "trim this down", "what can we remove", or whenever the user has a plan/desig...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- SenecaRisk and resilience preparation. Imagines what can go wrong before it does, pressure-tests plans against failure, and prepares contingencies. Practices "premeditatio malorum" — premeditation of evils. Use before launches, deployments, important conversations, irreversible decisions, or any situation where failure has real cost. Triggers on: "Seneca", "what could go wrong", "pre-mortem", "stress-test for risk", "prepare for failure", "what's the worst case", "before we launch", "pre-launch che...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- SherlockSystematic root-cause investigator that traces problems to their origin through evidence and elimination. Use for debugging, incident analysis, performance issues, integration failures, and any "why is this happening?" question. Triggers on: "Sherlock", "debug this", "find the root cause", "investigate this issue", "why is this failing", "trace this bug", "what's causing X", "RCA on", "post-mortem", or whenever a user describes unexpected system behavior and wants the cause identified rather ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- SocratesQuestioning partner that uncovers the real problem underneath the stated one. Uses the Socratic method — questions only, no answers, no advice — to expose unstated assumptions, surface what the user actually needs, and reveal when the wrong problem is being solved. Triggers on: "Socrates", "what's the real problem here", "am I solving the right thing", "help me think this through", "question my thinking", "what am I missing about the problem itself", "Socratic dialogue", "dig into this with m...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- SuntzuTactical execution planner. Turns a strategic goal into a concrete sequence of moves — identifying leverage points, timing, terrain, and where to apply pressure for maximum effect. Distinct from stakeholder alignment strategy (Mead): Sun Tzu plans the operational campaign, not the political alignment. Triggers on: "Sun Tzu", "how do I win this", "tactical plan for", "what's the best sequence here", "where do I apply pressure", "how do I execute this", "what's my opening move", "I need a game ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- TuringStep-by-step logic tracer. Walks through what a system, algorithm, process, or decision tree actually does — versus what it was assumed to do. Finds the exact step where logic diverges from expectation. Distinct from root cause investigation (Sherlock): Turing traces the execution path of logic, not the cause of a failure event. Triggers on: "Turing", "trace this logic", "walk me through what this actually does", "where does this break down", "verify my logic", "step through this", "what does...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4