All authors
Claude Skills by mohitagw15856
github.com/mohitagw158562,747 skills66 installs2,935 views
- Demand Forecast ReviewInterrogate a demand forecast before the business commits supply and inventory to it. Use when asked to review a demand plan, challenge a forecast, check forecast accuracy, decompose baseline vs uplift, or find hockey sticks in the numbers. Produces a forecast credibility review with baseline/uplift decomposition, MAPE and bias history, hockey-stick flags, an assumption register, and consensus-vs-statistical divergence analysis.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Inventory PolicySet inventory policy for an item class: segmentation, safety stock, and replenishment method. Use when asked to set safety stock levels, segment items by ABC/XYZ, choose reorder points vs min-max, define stocking policy, or review excess and obsolete inventory. Produces a segmentation grid, per-segment service targets and safety-stock logic, a replenishment method choice per segment, and an E&O review cadence.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Logistics Incident ReportWrite up a supply chain disruption — port delay, carrier failure, customs hold, or in-transit damage — as a decision-ready incident report. Use when asked to document a shipment delay, write up a logistics failure, report a customs hold, quantify a supply disruption, or draft the customer notice for a late delivery. Produces an impact-quantified incident report with containment actions, root cause, prevention items, and a customer-communication draft.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Rfp Scoring MatrixBuild a weighted RFP evaluation matrix and defensible award recommendation. Use when asked to score RFP responses, compare vendor bids, build a supplier evaluation matrix, run a sourcing event scorecard, or decide which bidder to award. Produces a criteria tree with weights, scoring anchors, normalized price scores, a consensus-scored comparison table, and an award recommendation with sensitivity check.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Sop Meeting PrepPrepare an S&OP cycle readout that surfaces the demand-supply gaps and forces the three decisions the meeting must make. Use when asked to prep an S&OP meeting, build the executive S&OP deck, summarize demand vs supply for the monthly cycle, or prepare a supply review readout. Produces a gap table, scenario levers with costs, an inventory projection, a decisions-required list, and a pre-read package.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Supplier ScorecardBuild a quarterly supplier performance scorecard with a weighted grade and a clear escalate/develop/exit call. Use when asked to review supplier performance, prepare a quarterly business review for a vendor, score a supplier on OTIF and quality, or decide whether to escalate or exit a supplier. Produces a weighted scorecard with trend arrows, per-dimension evidence, corrective-action status, and a recommendation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Csat Nps AnalysisAnalyse CSAT / NPS / CES survey results and turn the score into actions. Use when asked to analyse NPS, CSAT, or CES data, compute an NPS score, interpret survey verbatims, or build a voice-of-customer readout. Produces a readout — the computed score, the trend & benchmark, themed analysis of the comments (what drives promoters vs. detractors), and prioritised actions. Includes a stdlib NPS/CSAT calculator.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Escalation TreeDesign a support/incident escalation tree — who handles what, when it escalates, and to whom. Use when asked to design an escalation path, an escalation matrix, support tiers, an on-call escalation policy, or to fix 'tickets bounce around / nothing gets escalated in time'. Produces an escalation tree — tiers & ownership, severity definitions, time-based triggers, routing rules, contacts/roles, and the customer-communication cadence per level.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Help Center ArticleWrite a help-center / knowledge-base article that actually resolves the issue and deflects tickets. Use when asked to write a help doc, KB article, FAQ entry, how-to, or support documentation. Produces a findable, skimmable article — task-based title, the answer up front, numbered steps, screenshots-to-add markers, troubleshooting, and related links — written so users self-serve instead of contacting support.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Kb AuditAudit a knowledge base / help center for coverage, accuracy, and findability. Use when asked to audit a help center, review KB health, find documentation gaps, reduce ticket volume with better docs, or prioritise what to write/fix. Produces an audit — a health scorecard, content gaps (driven by top ticket drivers), stale/duplicate/low-findability articles, and a prioritised fix-and-create backlog.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Support MacroWrite reusable support macros / canned responses that sound human, not robotic. Use when asked to write a support macro, a canned response, a saved reply, or a template for a common customer ticket. Produces a macro — an empathetic opener, the clear answer/steps, placeholders for personalisation, and a warm close — plus variants (resolved / need-more-info / escalating), tuned to keep it human.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Support RunbookWrite a support runbook for handling a recurring issue type consistently. Use when asked to write a support runbook, a troubleshooting playbook for agents, a handling guide for a common issue, or a tier-1 response procedure. Produces a runbook — issue identification, triage/severity, step-by-step diagnosis & resolution, decision tree, when/how to escalate, and the customer-comms templates — so any agent resolves it the same way.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Board Game DesignerSummarise what Board Game Designer does in one line. Use when asked to [trigger phrases the user would say]. Produces [the concrete artifact].Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Game Night PlannerSummarise what Game Night Planner does in one line. Use when asked to [trigger phrases the user would say]. Produces [the concrete artifact].Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Rules LawyerSummarise what Rules Lawyer does in one line. Use when asked to [trigger phrases the user would say]. Produces [the concrete artifact].Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Tabletop NegotiatorSummarise what Tabletop Negotiator does in one line. Use when asked to [trigger phrases the user would say]. Produces [the concrete artifact].Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Teach The GameSummarise what Teach The Game does in one line. Use when asked to [trigger phrases the user would say]. Produces [the concrete artifact].Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Behavior Intervention PlanBuild a tiered classroom behavior intervention plan (BIP) for a K-12 student, grounded in the function of the behavior. Use when asked to plan a behavior intervention, address a disruptive or off-task pattern, write a BIP, or set up positive behavior supports. Produces a function hypothesis, prevention/antecedent strategies, teaching of a replacement behavior, a response plan for when it happens, and a simple data-tracking method — positive and skill-building, not punitive.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Iep Goal WriterWrite measurable IEP goals and matching accommodations for a K-12 student with an IEP or 504 plan. Use when asked to write an IEP goal, draft annual goals, make a goal measurable, or list accommodations. Produces SMART annual goals (baseline, condition, behavior, criterion, measurement) with short-term objectives and a set of accommodations tied to the student's needs — written to be legally defensible and progress-monitorable.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Lesson Plan BuilderBuild a standards-aligned K-12 lesson plan with clear objectives, a timed activity sequence, checks for understanding, and differentiation. Use when asked to plan a lesson, write a lesson plan, align a lesson to a standard, or turn a topic into a class period. Produces measurable objectives, a bell-to-bell timeline (hook → instruction → practice → close), formative checks, differentiation for varied learners, and the materials list.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Parent Conference PrepPrepare for a K-12 parent-teacher conference — including the hard ones. Use when asked to prep for a parent conference, plan what to say to a parent, or handle a difficult conversation about a student's behavior or grades. Produces a structured agenda, strengths-first talking points backed by specific evidence, a plan for the tough message, anticipated parent reactions with responses, and agreed next steps.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Assumption AuditSurface the hidden assumptions a plan or belief rests on, then test what happens when each one is wrong. Use when asked what am I assuming here, check my assumptions, what if I'm wrong about, or stress-test my thinking. Produces the unstated assumptions your conclusion depends on (ranked by how load-bearing they are), a flip of each to see which one breaking would change everything, and the cheapest way to check the riskiest ones — because the assumption you didn't know you were making is wha...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Cross Examine MeStress-test a decision or claim through a sharp, fair Q&A — the questions a good lawyer or skeptical friend would ask before you commit. Use when asked to cross-examine me, ask me hard questions about this, interrogate my plan, or make me defend this. Produces a sequenced line of probing questions (from clarifying to challenging to the killer question), space to answer, and a debrief on where your answers were strong, evasive, or exposed a gap — so weaknesses surface in private before they su...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Decision PanelRun a decision past a panel of clashing advisors — an optimist, a pessimist, a numbers person, an ethicist, and future-you — then get a chair's verdict. Use when asked to help me decide, weigh this decision, what should I do about, or run this by different advisors. Produces each advisor's honest take on the decision (each committed to their lens), where they disagree most, the question that would break the tie, and a chair's recommendation that weighs the panel — turning a lonely choice into...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Devils Advocate On DemandArgue hard against whatever you just concluded — so your decision has to survive a real challenge instead of an echo chamber. Use when asked to play devil's advocate, argue against this, challenge my conclusion, or talk me out of it. Produces the strongest case against your position, the uncomfortable questions you're avoiding, the evidence that cuts the other way, and an honest read on whether your conclusion survives the challenge — deliberately countering the 'that's a great idea!' agreeme...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Explain My Decision To MeTalk through a decision out loud with a patient thinking partner that reflects your reasoning back, so the answer you already half-know becomes clear. Use when asked help me think this through, I need to talk this out, be my sounding board, or I don't know what I actually think. Produces a structured reflection of your own reasoning — what you've actually said, the values driving it, the contradictions and gaps, and the question that would clarify it — acting as a rubber-duck / sounding board...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Five MindsAnswer a question five completely different ways — as five independent minds with clashing worldviews — then converge on what survives. Use when asked for multiple perspectives, look at this from every angle, what would different people think, or give me a range of views not one answer. Produces five genuinely distinct takes (each committed to one worldview, not hedged), the tensions between them made explicit, and a final synthesis that keeps what's strongest — deliberately widening the rang...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- From First PrinciplesStrip a problem down to what's actually true — the physics, economics, and human basics — and rebuild the answer from there, ignoring 'how it's normally done'. Use when asked to think from first principles, why is this done this way, challenge the assumptions here, or rebuild this from scratch. Produces the problem reduced to its fundamental truths, the inherited assumptions and conventions named and questioned, and a solution reasoned up from the basics — which often looks nothing like the d...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Future Selves CouncilBring three versions of future-you into a decision — you in a week, in a year, and in ten years — because they each want different things. Use when asked what would future me want, will I regret this, think long-term about this choice, or help me decide for the long run. Produces each future self's honest take on today's decision, where they conflict (short-term relief vs long-term payoff), whose vote should weigh most given what's at stake, and the choice that best serves the future-you that...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Generate Then ExecuteSeparate raw idea-generation from judgment so creativity isn't strangled by your inner critic — diverge with zero evaluation, then switch to hard critique. Use when asked to brainstorm properly, help me come up with ideas without shutting them down, I keep censoring my own ideas, or separate creating from editing. Produces a pure generation pass (quantity, no judging, no hedging, wild allowed), a clean break, then a separate ruthless critique pass that scores and prunes — because doing both a...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Idea StormGenerate a big, wide spread of ideas for anything by running the prompt through many different lenses at once, then clustering and picking. Use when asked to brainstorm ideas for, give me lots of options, help me come up with, or I need ideas for. Produces a high-volume, deliberately varied idea list generated across multiple angles (safe, wild, cheap, ambitious, weird, opposite), grouped into themes, and a shortlist of the most promising — maximizing range so you're not choosing from three o...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Inversion ThinkingSolve a problem backwards — ask how to guarantee the worst outcome, then avoid all of it. Use when asked to help me not fail at, what could go wrong with, how do I avoid messing up, or think about this in reverse. Produces the inverted question (how to guarantee failure), the specific ways you'd cause the disaster, and then the plan that is simply the avoidance of each — often clearer and more actionable than trying to plan success directly, because failure modes are more concrete than succes...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Is This Actually GoodGet an honest verdict on whether something you made is actually good — not the reflexive 'this is great!' but a real, criteria-based judgment. Use when asked is this actually any good, be honest is this good enough, rate this honestly, or don't just say it's great. Produces a grounded assessment against real standards for the format, a clear verdict (great / good / fine / not there yet), the specific things holding it back from the next level, and what it would take to get there — deliberatel...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Panel Of ExpertsGet the take of the specific experts a situation actually needs — a lawyer, a therapist, an accountant, a doctor-minded thinker, whoever fits — each in their own voice. Use when asked what would a [profession] say, get expert perspectives on this, who should I be thinking like here, or what am I missing that a pro would catch. Produces a panel of the right domain experts for your situation, each flagging what a layperson would miss, where they'd disagree, and what to verify with a real profes...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Poke Holes In ThisGet only the weaknesses in something you made — no praise, no encouragement padding, just the holes and how to fix them. Use when asked to poke holes in this, tell me what's wrong with this, critique this honestly, or don't be nice about it. Produces a focused list of the real problems in your draft, plan, argument, or code — ranked by severity, each with why it's a problem and a concrete fix — deliberately stripping the 'this is great!' padding that AI and polite humans add and you don't need.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Pre Mortem PanelImagine your plan already failed, then get five independent 'here's why it died' stories — before you commit. Use when asked to pre-mortem this, why might this fail, what are the risks before I start, or imagine this went wrong. Produces five distinct failure narratives (each from a different cause — execution, timing, people, external, wrong-assumption), the most likely and most lethal among them, the early warning signs of each, and the specific mitigations worth doing now — catching failur...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Red Team My PlanAttack your own plan the way a smart adversary would — find the weakest point, the thing you're hoping nobody notices, and where it breaks under pressure. Use when asked to red-team this, attack my plan, find the holes, or where does this break. Produces an adversarial breakdown of the plan's weakest points, the single move an opponent (or reality) would make to break it, the part you're quietly hoping holds, and the fixes that close the biggest gaps — a hostile stress-test done by your own s...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Steelman The Weird OptionTake the option you dismissed in two seconds and build the strongest possible case for it — to check whether your fast 'no' was wisdom or just bias. Use when asked to steelman this, make the case for the option I rejected, argue the other side properly, or why might the weird choice be right. Produces the strongest honest argument for the dismissed option, the conditions under which it's actually the best choice, what your quick rejection assumed, and a fair verdict on whether the reconsidera...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- The Boring Answer DetectorScan a plan, draft, or idea for the generic, textbook, everyone-would-say-that lines — and push each toward something sharper and more specific. Use when asked is this too generic, make this less boring, why does my plan feel bland, or spot the clichés in my thinking. Produces a line-by-line flag of the mediocre and predictable parts, why each is forgettable, and a sharper, more specific, or more surprising alternative for each — so the output stops sounding like the average of the internet.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- The Second OpinionDeliberately take the opposite position from your leaning and make you defend yours — a forced second opinion that isn't just an echo. Use when asked give me a real second opinion, don't just agree with me, argue the other way, or I need a fresh take not a yes-man. Produces a committed alternative position to whatever you're inclined toward, the strongest reasons it might be right, the questions it forces you to answer, and an honest read on whether your original leaning still stands after th...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- The Skeptic And The BelieverSee an idea through two committed extremes — a true believer and a hard skeptic — so you get the full range before settling in the middle. Use when asked should I believe this, is this hype or real, give me both sides, or how excited should I be about. Produces the believer's fullest bull case and the skeptic's sharpest bear case (each committed, not hedged), the crux question that separates them, and a grounded read on where the truth probably sits — great for evaluating claims, trends, oppo...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- The Strong NoFind the real reason to NOT do the exciting thing you're about to commit to — the honest case against, before the excitement carries you in. Use when asked talk me out of this, should I really do this, what's the case against, or I'm excited but is this a mistake. Produces the strongest honest argument for not doing it, the excitement biases clouding your judgment, the specific conditions under which this is a bad idea for you, and a clear read on whether the strong no actually wins — protect...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- The Third AnswerPush past the first few obvious answers to a question and surface the non-obvious idea worth having. Use when asked to give me a non-obvious idea, don't give me the generic answer, think outside the box on, or what's the answer nobody else would give. Produces the obvious answers named and set aside (so we don't repeat them), then genuinely different angles found by continuing past where most thinking stops, each with why it's non-obvious and whether it actually holds up — trading textbook-co...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Think From Another AngleGet unstuck on a problem by deliberately re-framing it through a different lens — a child's, an outsider's, another industry's, the reverse, the extreme. Use when asked I'm stuck on this, look at this differently, reframe this problem, or how else could I think about this. Produces the same problem re-cast through several deliberately different frames (each of which changes what the problem even is), what each reframe reveals, and the most useful new angle to pursue — because being stuck is u...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- What Am I Not SeeingSurface the blind spot — the missing stakeholder, the ignored option, the risk outside your frame, the thing you're too close to notice. Use when asked what am I missing, what's my blind spot, what haven't I considered, or is there something I'm not seeing here. Produces the considerations outside your current frame: who you haven't accounted for, what you've ruled out without noticing, the second-order effects, and the thing your closeness to the situation hides — the opposite of confirming ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Context BudgetPlan a session's context window like the budget it is — what loads up front, what gets linked instead, what stays fetch-on-demand, and how to keep the stable prefix cache-friendly so repeated turns cost cents instead of dollars. Use when asked my agent keeps blowing its context, plan what to load into the session, why is every turn so expensive, or design the context for this workflow. Produces the load/link/fetch allocation, the cache-aware prefix layout, the per-turn cost shape, and the evi...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Context CrusherCompress tool outputs, logs, and JSON before they enter the context window — structural compression via a deterministic stdlib script (schema + samples + stats instead of 300 raw rows), no API, no summarization loss. Use when asked shrink this tool output, my context is full of JSON, compress these logs before analysis, or stop wasting tokens on raw data. Produces the crushed artifact with its token math shown, the crush-or-keep decision rules, and the fetch-the-original escape hatch.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Repo MapNavigate a codebase by map instead of reading files wholesale — a deterministic stdlib script that emits the tree with line counts and top-level symbols, plus the read-the-map-first discipline that cuts exploration tokens by an order of magnitude. Use when asked explore this repo efficiently, stop re-reading the whole codebase, make a map of this project, or which files should the agent actually open. Produces the compact map with its token math (map vs. everything), the navigation discipline...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Token CostMeasure before optimizing — estimate token counts locally with stated heuristics, price them at your model's rates, and quantify before/after savings, because token optimization without measurement is vibes. Use when asked how many tokens is this, what does this context cost per call, is this optimization worth it, or compare these two versions' cost. Produces the estimate with both heuristics shown, the cost math at your prices across your call volume, and the before/after comparison that de...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330
- Token DietCut LLM output tokens 40–70% by stripping grammatical scaffolding while preserving every fact — telegraphic output modes, when they pay (pipelines, long sessions) and when they don't (single shots, human-facing prose), with the mode lines to switch on demand. Use when asked make the model respond tersely, cut output token costs, caveman mode, or compress agent-to-agent messages. Produces the diet-mode instruction block ready to paste, the three compression levels with examples, the economics ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,330