Claude Skills by l4ci

Use when the user wants to build or test a real strategy for an organization, unit, or initiative, or to check whether an existing "strategy" is actually one. Captures the challenge, fans out competing diagnostician subagents to name the crux from different angles in parallel, then synthesizes the sharpest diagnosis into a kernel (diagnosis, guiding policy, coherent action) and audits the result against Rumelt's four hallmarks of bad strategy in a detailed markdown report. Triggers include "s...

Use when the user wants a SWOT analysis of a company, product, project, team, or decision, or asks to assess strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Fans out four parallel analyst subagents (one per quadrant), grounds each factor in evidence and prioritizes it, then crosses the quadrants into a TOWS strategy matrix and a ranked set of strategic options in a detailed markdown report. Triggers include "SWOT", "SWOT analysis", "strengths and weaknesses", "TOWS", "analyze our position".

Use when the user has a specific conflict, disagreement, or dispute to navigate and needs to decide how to handle it. Diagnoses the situation along assertiveness and cooperativeness, then fans out five parallel analyst subagents (one per conflict mode) to score how well each fits this situation, and synthesizes a primary mode and fallback with concrete words and actions, flagging when the user's habitual default is mismatched. Triggers include "Thomas-Kilmann", "TKI", "conflict mode", "how sh...

Use when the user wants to assess or plan growth and innovation across time using McKinsey's Three Horizons model (Horizon 1 core, Horizon 2 emerging, Horizon 3 options). Fans out three parallel analyst subagents (one per horizon) to place and assess initiatives, then synthesizes portfolio balance, pipeline gaps, and how each horizon should be funded and measured, in a detailed markdown report. Triggers include "three horizons", "3 horizons", "horizon 1 2 3", "growth horizons", "innovation po...

Use when the user has a fuzzy or broad problem and needs to sharpen it into a crisp, solvable problem statement before analyzing or solving it. Walks through the TOSCA framework (Trouble, Owner, Success criteria, Constraints, Actors) as a guided interview, challenges weak answers, stress-tests the framing with parallel critic subagents, and writes a problem-definition brief. Triggers include "TOSCA", "define the problem", "frame this problem", "problem statement", "I'm not sure what the real ...

Use when the user wants to diagnose a team''s stage of development and what it needs to advance, or asks why a team is stuck, conflicted, or not yet performing. Fans out five parallel assessor subagents (one per stage: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, Adjourning), each scoring how well the team''s observable behaviors match that stage with evidence and noting regression signals, then synthesizes the current stage, the matching leadership focus, the concrete moves to advance, and what i...

Use when the user wants to analyze how a company creates value and where its competitive advantage lies, using Porter's Value Chain (inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, service, plus firm infrastructure, HR, technology development, procurement). Fans out parallel analyst subagents per activity to assess cost and value contribution versus competitors, then synthesizes the sources of advantage, weak links, and linkages in a detailed markdown report. Triggers ...

Use when the user wants a Value Proposition Canvas for an offering and a customer segment, or asks to test whether a product fits what a customer actually needs. Fans out six parallel analyst subagents, three describing and ranking the Customer Profile (jobs, pains, gains) and three describing the Value Map (products and services, pain relievers, gain creators), each marking claims as fact or assumption, then ranks the customer side and assesses fit: which top jobs, pains, and gains the value...

Use when the user wants a VRIO analysis of a firm's resources and capabilities, or asks whether a resource is a source of sustained competitive advantage. Optionally surfaces candidate resources first, then fans out one analyst subagent per resource to run the four VRIO gates (Valuable, Rare, Costly to Imitate, Organized) with evidence and assign a competitive implication, then synthesizes the strategic core and fixable gaps into a detailed markdown report. Triggers include "VRIO", "VRIN", "r...

Use when the user wants to choose among several options against multiple weighted criteria with a transparent, defensible score (the weighted scoring model or Pugh matrix). Calibrates the criteria, their weights, and the scoring scale first, then scores each option in parallel, one subagent per option, before computing weighted totals, ranking, and running a sensitivity check in a markdown report. Triggers include "decision matrix", "weighted scoring", "Pugh matrix", "compare options against ...