Claude Skills by docxology

Monitor an information space for emerging narratives and inflection points.

Document collection, handling, and hashing so evidence integrity is auditable.

Verify a public claim by tracing it to a primary source and corroborating independently.

Plan ethical, scoped collection tied to specific intelligence requirements.

Require independent corroboration before promoting a claim to a finding.

Audit a dataset's origin, licensing, sampling, and integrity before analytic use.

Confirm where imagery was taken using corroborating geographic features (defensive OSINT).

Triage media for reuse, editing, and context-collapse before treating it as evidence.

Use and sanity-check file/post metadata while accounting for stripping and spoofing.

Identify inauthentic personas from behavioral, temporal, and network signals.

Vet a source's identity, track record, motive, and access before relying on it.

Assign and justify confidence using source quality, corroboration, and assumption load.

Produce calibrated probability estimates with explicit reference classes and ranges.

Grade evidence by quality and relevance using an explicit, repeatable rubric.

Synthesize a body of sources into a structured, evidence-graded, gap-aware briefing.

Write findings bottom-line-up-front with traceable evidence and stated confidence.

Build multiple plausible futures around critical uncertainties to stress strategy.

Score evidence by diagnosticity across a full hypothesis set to find the least-disconfirmed explanation.

Cross-tabulate variables to organize evidence and reveal relationships.

Diagram claims, premises, and inferential links to expose logical structure and gaps.

Trace cause-effect chains and feedback loops driving a system's behavior.

Order events temporally to expose gaps, correlations, and causal sequencing.

Assess how each driver influences every other to find leverage and feedback.

Clarify Audience, Issue, Message, and Storyline so the product fits the decision it serves.

Build the strongest principled case against the consensus to test its robustness.

Apply Bayesian-style updating of a single new datum against competing explanations.

Frame an analytic task: question, drivers, assumptions, and prior judgments before diving in.

Define observable signs that would reveal which scenario or hypothesis is unfolding.

Test indicators for diagnosticity: do they actually discriminate between outcomes?

Restate the question multiple ways to escape an unhelpful initial framing.

Surface, classify, and stress-test the load-bearing assumptions an analysis rests on.

Externalize a problem's concepts and relationships as a navigable graph.

Enumerate the parameter space of a problem to bound the set of possibilities.

Force a complete, mutually exclusive hypothesis set before evaluating any one.

Map actors and links; compute centrality and brokerage to find key nodes.

Silent independent ideation before discussion to counter dominance and groupthink.

Start from the broad external forces (PESTLE) shaping the issue before the specifics.

Assume the conclusion failed; work backward to find what would have caused it.

Lay out a process or adversary plan as sequenced, dependency-aware steps.

Systematically permute key assumptions into a matrix of alternative outcomes.

Order items by weighted criteria (ranked voting, paired comparison, weighted scoring).

Model an adversary's perceptions and likely decisions from their frame, not yours.

Track leading indicators over time to detect trajectory shifts early.

Group large evidence sets by attributes to surface patterns and outliers.

Generate questions (who/what/when/where/why/how) before answers to map the unknowns.

Reason from a disciplined set of comparable historical cases, not a single anecdote.

Divergent then convergent idea generation with explicit anti-anchoring steps.

Apply a checklist of challenge questions to one's own analysis before release.

Pit two teams' competing interpretations against each other in structured debate.

Posit a surprising event as already true and reason out its precursors and implications.