Select and configure nonlinear solvers for root-finding f(x)=0, optimization min F(x), and least-squares problems — choose among Newton, Newton-Krylov, quasi-Newton (BFGS, L-BFGS), Broyden, Anderson acceleration, and Levenberg-Marquardt methods, configure line search or trust-region globalization, diagnose convergence rate (quadratic, linear, stagnated), and assess Jacobian quality and conditioning. Use when a Newton solver converges slowly or diverges, choosing between line search and trust ...
Scanned 9/22/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NVlabs/Skill2Env --skill nonlinear-solvers --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Nonlinear Solvers?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nvlabs-nonlinear-solvers)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: nonlinear-solvers
description: >
Select and configure nonlinear solvers for root-finding f(x)=0, optimization
min F(x), and least-squares problems — choose among Newton, Newton-Krylov,
quasi-Newton (BFGS, L-BFGS), Broyden, Anderson acceleration, and
Levenberg-Marquardt methods, configure line search or trust-region
globalization, diagnose convergence rate (quadratic, linear, stagnated),
and assess Jacobian quality and conditioning. Use when a Newton solver
converges slowly or diverges, choosing between line search and trust region,
debugging nonlinear iteration failures in FEM or phase-field codes, or
selecting a solver for large-scale unconstrained optimization, even if
the user only says "my Newton iterations aren't converging."
allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Write, Grep, Glob
metadata:
author: HeshamFS
version: "1.2.2"
security_tier: high
security_reviewed: true
tested_with:
- claude-code
last_evaluated: "2026-06-24"
eval_cases: 5
last_reviewed: "2026-06-23"
standards:
- "Nocedal & Wright (2006), Numerical Optimization (BFGS/L-BFGS, trust region, dogleg, Steihaug-CG, Wolfe conditions)"
- "Dennis & Schnabel (1996), Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations (Newton, Broyden good/bad, line-search globalization)"
- "Kelley (1995), Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations (inexact Newton, Newton-Krylov); Eisenstat & Walker (1996) forcing sequence"
- "Walker & Ni (2011), Anderson acceleration for fixed-point iterations (Anderson 1965)"
- "Levenberg (1944) / Marquardt (1963), Levenberg-Marquardt method for nonlinear least-squares"
---
# Nonlinear Solvers
## Goal
Provide a universal workflow to select a nonlinear solver, configure globalization strategies, and diagnose convergence for root-finding, optimization, and least-squares problems.
## Requirements
- Python 3.10+
- NumPy (for Jacobian diagnostics)
- SciPy (optional, for advanced analysis)
## Inputs to Gather
| Input | Description | Example |
|-------|-------------|---------|
| Problem type | Root-finding, optimization, least-squares | `root-finding` |
| Problem size | Number of unknowns | `n = 10000` |
| Jacobian availability | Analytic, finite-diff, unavailable | `analytic` |
| Jacobian cost | Cheap or expensive to compute | `expensive` |
| Constraints | None, bounds, equality, inequality | `none` |
| Smoothness | Is objective/residual smooth? | `yes` |
| Residual history | Sequence of residual norms | `1,0.1,0.01,...` |
## Decision Guidance
### Solver Selection Flowchart
```
Is Jacobian available and cheap?
├── YES → Problem size?
│ ├── Small (n < 1000) → Newton (full)
│ └── Large (n ≥ 1000) → Newton-Krylov
└── NO → Is objective smooth?
├── YES → Memory limited?
│ ├── YES → L-BFGS or Broyden
│ └── NO → BFGS
└── NO → Anderson acceleration or Picard
```
### Quick Reference
| Problem Type | First Choice | Alternative | Globalization |
|--------------|--------------|-------------|---------------|
| Small root-finding | Newton | Broyden | Line search |
| Large root-finding | Newton-Krylov | Anderson | Trust region |
| Optimization | L-BFGS | BFGS | Wolfe line search |
| Least-squares | Levenberg-Marquardt | Gauss-Newton | Trust region |
| Bound constrained | L-BFGS-B | Trust-region reflective | Projected |
## Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Key Outputs |
|--------|-------------|
| `scripts/solver_selector.py` | `recommended`, `alternatives`, `notes` |
| `scripts/convergence_analyzer.py` | `converged`, `convergence_type`, `estimated_rate`, `diagnosis` |
| `scripts/jacobian_diagnostics.py` | `condition_number`, `jacobian_quality`, `rank_deficient` |
| `scripts/globalization_advisor.py` | `strategy`, `line_search_type`, `trust_region_type`, `parameters` |
| `scripts/residual_monitor.py` | `patterns_detected`, `alerts`, `recommendations` |
| `scripts/step_quality.py` | `ratio`, `step_quality`, `accept_step`, `trust_radius_action` |
## Workflow
1. **Characterize problem** - Identify type, size, Jacobian availability
2. **Select solver** - Run `scripts/solver_selector.py`
3. **Choose globalization** - Run `scripts/globalization_advisor.py`
4. **Analyze Jacobian** - If available, run `scripts/jacobian_diagnostics.py`
5. **Monitor residuals** - During solve, use `scripts/residual_monitor.py`
6. **Analyze convergence** - Run `scripts/convergence_analyzer.py`
7. **Evaluate steps** - For trust region, use `scripts/step_quality.py`
## Conversational Workflow Example
**User**: My Newton solver for a phase-field simulation is converging very slowly. After 50 iterations, the residual only dropped from 1 to 0.1.
**Agent workflow**:
1. Analyze convergence:
```bash
python3 scripts/convergence_analyzer.py --residuals 1,0.8,0.6,0.5,0.4,0.3,0.2,0.15,0.12,0.1 --json
```
2. Check globalization strategy:
```bash
python3 scripts/globalization_advisor.py --problem-type root-finding --jacobian-quality ill-conditioned --previous-failures 0 --json
```
3. Recommend: Switch to trust region with Levenberg-Marquardt regularization, or use Newton-Krylov with better preconditioning.
## Pre-Solve Checklist
- [ ] Confirm problem type (root-finding, optimization, least-squares)
- [ ] Assess Jacobian availability and cost
- [ ] Check initial guess quality
- [ ] Set appropriate tolerances
- [ ] Choose globalization strategy
- [ ] Prepare to monitor convergence
## CLI Examples
```bash
# Select solver for large unconstrained optimization
python3 scripts/solver_selector.py --size 50000 --smooth --memory-limited --json
# Select solver for a small nonlinear least-squares (data-fitting) problem
python3 scripts/solver_selector.py --problem-type least-squares --size 6 --jacobian-available --smooth --json
# Analyze convergence from residual history
python3 scripts/convergence_analyzer.py --residuals 1,0.1,0.01,0.001,0.0001 --tolerance 1e-6 --json
# Diagnose Jacobian quality
python3 scripts/jacobian_diagnostics.py --matrix jacobian.txt --json
# Get globalization recommendation
python3 scripts/globalization_advisor.py --problem-type optimization --jacobian-quality good --json
# Globalization for a distant initial guess (favors trust region)
python3 scripts/globalization_advisor.py --problem-type root-finding --jacobian-quality good --far-from-solution --json
# Monitor residual patterns
python3 scripts/residual_monitor.py --residuals 1,0.8,0.9,0.7,0.75,0.6 --target-tolerance 1e-8 --json
# Evaluate step quality for trust region
python3 scripts/step_quality.py --predicted-reduction 0.5 --actual-reduction 0.4 --step-norm 0.8 --gradient-norm 1.0 --trust-radius 1.0 --json
```
## Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|-------|-------|------------|
| `problem_size must be positive` | Invalid size | Check problem dimension |
| `problem_size (...) exceeds maximum (...)` | Size above 10 billion cap | Re-check the unit/value |
| `constraint_type must be one of...` | Unknown constraint | Use: none, bound, equality, inequality |
| `problem_type must be one of...` | Unknown problem type | Use: root-finding, optimization, least-squares |
| `residuals must be non-negative` | Invalid residual data | Check residual computation |
| `residuals must be finite` | NaN/Inf in residual data | Sanitize residual history |
| `residual list length (...) exceeds limit (...)` | More than 100,000 entries | Downsample the history |
| `Matrix file not found` | Invalid path | Verify Jacobian file exists |
| `Matrix file exceeds size limit ...` | Matrix file too large | Use a smaller / sparser matrix |
## Interpretation Guidance
### Convergence Type
| Type | Meaning | Action |
|------|---------|--------|
| quadratic | Optimal Newton (order p ≈ 2) | Continue, near solution |
| superlinear | Ratios shrinking toward 0 (1 < p < 2); quasi-Newton working | Monitor for stagnation |
| linear | Constant contraction ratio (p ≈ 1); a small constant ratio is fast-linear, not superlinear | May improve with preconditioner |
| sublinear | Too slow (ratio → 1) | Change method or formulation |
| stagnated | No progress | Check Jacobian, preconditioner |
| diverged | Increasing residual | Add globalization, check Jacobian |
### Jacobian Quality
| Quality | Condition Number | Action |
|---------|------------------|--------|
| good | < 10⁶ | Standard Newton works |
| moderately-conditioned | 10⁶ - 10¹⁰ | Consider scaling |
| ill-conditioned | > 10¹⁰ | Use regularization |
| near-singular | ∞ | Reformulate or use LM |
### Step Quality (Trust Region)
| Ratio ρ | Quality | Trust Radius |
|---------|---------|--------------|
| ρ < 0 | very_poor | Shrink aggressively |
| ρ < 0.25 | marginal | Shrink |
| 0.25 ≤ ρ < 0.75 | good | Maintain |
| ρ ≥ 0.75 | excellent | Expand if at boundary |
## Verification checklist
Do not trust a "solved" claim until these concrete artifacts are recorded:
- [ ] Logged the full residual norm history and ran `convergence_analyzer.py --residuals <history>`; recorded `convergence_type` and `estimated_rate`, and confirmed `converged: true` against the actual solver tolerance (not the default `1e-10`).
- [ ] Confirmed the residual sequence is monotone-decreasing or fed it to `residual_monitor.py`; recorded `patterns_detected` and verified it does NOT include `diverging`, `oscillating`, `plateau`, or `slow_convergence` while still above tolerance.
- [ ] If a Jacobian is available, ran `jacobian_diagnostics.py --matrix J.txt` and recorded `condition_number` and `jacobian_quality`; for an analytic Jacobian, passed `--finite-diff-matrix` and confirmed `finite_diff_error` is below ~1e-2 (no "Large discrepancy" note).
- [ ] Checked `rank_deficient` from `jacobian_diagnostics.py` is `false` (or documented why a rank-deficient/near-singular Jacobian is expected and that Levenberg-Marquardt regularization is in use).
- [ ] For a trust-region solve, evaluated accepted steps with `step_quality.py` and recorded the reduction `ratio`; confirmed accepted steps have `ratio >= 0.25` (not `very_poor`/`poor`) and that the `trust_radius_action` matches the recorded ρ.
- [ ] Recorded the solver and globalization actually used and confirmed they match `solver_selector.py` and `globalization_advisor.py` recommendations for the stated problem type, size, and Jacobian quality (e.g., large/expensive-Jacobian → Newton-Krylov; least-squares → Levenberg-Marquardt trust region).
- [ ] Re-confirmed convergence after any change to tolerance, initial guess, or preconditioner — the convergence type can flip (e.g., quadratic → linear/stagnated) and must be re-classified, not assumed.
## Common pitfalls & rationalizations
| Tempting shortcut | Why it's wrong / what to do |
|-------------------|-----------------------------|
| "The residual ratio is a small constant (~0.1), so it's converging superlinearly." | A *constant* contraction ratio is linear, not superlinear — `convergence_analyzer.py` reports this as `linear` (annotated "fast linear"). Superlinear requires the ratio to tend to zero (order p > 1.2). Don't claim Newton-quality convergence from a flat ratio. |
| "It stopped without erroring, so the solver converged." | Run completion is not convergence. Check `converged` from `convergence_analyzer.py`/`residual_monitor.py` against the real tolerance; a `stagnated` or `plateau` result also "stops" but has not solved `f(x)=0`. |
| "Two iterations look like they're shrinking, so the rate is fine." | Order estimation needs at least 3 strictly decreasing positive residuals; with fewer, `convergence_analyzer.py` returns `unknown`/falls back to rate-only. Gather more iterations before quoting a convergence type. |
| "I coded the analytic Jacobian, so it must be right." | A wrong Jacobian still produces *some* step. Run `jacobian_diagnostics.py --finite-diff-matrix` and confirm `finite_diff_error` is small; a "Large discrepancy with finite-diff" note means the analytic Jacobian is buggy, which silently degrades Newton to linear convergence. |
| "Newton diverged, so I'll just shrink the global tolerance and call it close enough." | Divergence (`convergence_type: diverged`, or `diverging` pattern) signals a bad step direction or far-from-solution start — add globalization. Run `globalization_advisor.py` (use `--far-from-solution` / report failures) and switch to a trust region or damped step instead of loosening the target. |
| "Trust-region step decreased the objective, so accept and expand the radius." | Acceptance and radius growth depend on the reduction ratio ρ, not just sign. `step_quality.py` only flags `expand` when ρ ≥ 0.75 *and* the step hit the boundary; a small positive ρ (`marginal`) means accept-but-shrink. Use the recorded `trust_radius_action`. |
| "The Jacobian is large and expensive, but full Newton is the gold standard, so I'll form it anyway." | For n ≥ 1000 or expensive Jacobians, `solver_selector.py` routes to matrix-free Newton-Krylov (JFNK) precisely because forming/factoring J is infeasible; use Jacobian-vector products plus a preconditioner instead. |
## Security
### Input Validation
- `--size` (problem size) is validated as a positive integer, bounded at 10 billion
- `--residuals` are validated as finite non-negative numbers, capped at 100,000 entries
- `--tolerance` and `--target-tolerance` are validated as finite positive numbers
- `--problem-type` and `--constraint-type` are validated against fixed allowlists
- `--jacobian-quality` is validated against a fixed allowlist (`good`, `ill-conditioned`, etc.)
- Step quality parameters (`predicted-reduction`, `actual-reduction`, `step-norm`, `gradient-norm`, `trust-radius`) are validated as finite numbers
### File Access
- `jacobian_diagnostics.py` reads a single matrix file specified by `--matrix`; no directory traversal beyond the given path
- Matrix files are size-limited and loaded with `allow_pickle=False` to prevent code execution
- All other scripts read no external files; inputs are provided via CLI arguments
- Scripts write only to stdout (JSON output)
### Tool Restrictions
- **Read**: Used to inspect script source, references, and user configuration files
- **Bash**: Used to execute the six Python analysis scripts (`solver_selector.py`, `convergence_analyzer.py`, `jacobian_diagnostics.py`, `globalization_advisor.py`, `residual_monitor.py`, `step_quality.py`) with explicit argument lists
- **Write**: Used to save analysis results or solver recommendations; writes are scoped to the user's working directory
- **Grep/Glob**: Used to locate relevant files and search references
### Safety Measures
- No `eval()`, `exec()`, or dynamic code generation
- All subprocess calls use explicit argument lists (no `shell=True`)
- Matrix dimension limits prevent memory exhaustion when loading Jacobian files
- Residual history analysis operates on bounded-length numeric arrays only
## Limitations
- **No global convergence guarantee**: All methods may fail for pathological problems
- **Jacobian accuracy**: Finite-difference Jacobian may be inaccurate near discontinuities
- **Large dense problems**: May require specialized solvers not covered here
- **Constrained optimization**: Complex constraints need SQP or interior point methods
## References
- `references/solver_decision_tree.md` - Problem-based solver selection
- `references/method_catalog.md` - Method details and parameters
- `references/convergence_diagnostics.md` - Diagnosing convergence issues
- `references/globalization_strategies.md` - Line search and trust region
## Version History
- **v1.2.2** (2026-06-24): Added a "Verification checklist" (evidence tied to each script's JSON outputs — convergence type/rate, residual patterns, Jacobian condition/finite-diff error, rank, trust-region step ratio, and solver/globalization agreement) and a "Common pitfalls & rationalizations" table covering constant-ratio-vs-superlinear, run-completion-vs-convergence, too-few-iterations, unverified analytic Jacobians, divergence handling, trust-region acceptance, and large/expensive-Jacobian routing
- **v1.2.0** (2026-06-23): Added `--problem-type` to `solver_selector.py` with a nonlinear least-squares path (Levenberg-Marquardt / Gauss-Newton); reordered solver selection so problem size dominates high-accuracy and routes large/expensive-Jacobian problems to Newton-Krylov; added `--far-from-solution` to `globalization_advisor.py` and surfaced Levenberg-Marquardt as the trust-region type for least-squares; corrected convergence classification so constant-ratio sequences are linear (not superlinear); RFC-8259-safe JSON (no `-Infinity`); input-validation hardening
- **v1.1.0** (2026-03-26): Optimized agent-discovery description, evaluation suite, security review docs, standardized metadata block, CHANGELOG
- **v1.0.0**: Initial release with 6 analysis scripts
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!