Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Ln 42 Dependency Upgrader

ASecurity

Upgrades dependencies in reversible batches with version-specific compatibility and regression checks.

566 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/21/2026
developmentrustgogitapisecurityperformancedocumentation

Works with

cliapi

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/21/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-42-dependency-upgrader --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ln 42 Dependency Upgrader?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ln 42 Dependency Upgrader
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/levnikolaevich-ln-42-dependency-upgrader/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/levnikolaevich-ln-42-dependency-upgrader)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: ln-42-dependency-upgrader
description: "Upgrades dependencies in reversible batches with version-specific compatibility and regression checks."
---

# Dependency Upgrader

**Goal:** Upgrade dependencies in small, attributable batches. Preserve manifests, lockfiles, runtime support, and product behavior; do not treat a newer version as valuable without compatibility, security, or maintenance evidence.

**Execution contract:** The checklist defines completion. Track each item internally as `PENDING`, `PROVEN` with evidence, `CLEARED` with evidence its condition is absent, or `UNPROVEN` with a gap; reading, delegation, or tool failure is not proof. Reconcile after each section. Before returning, resolve all `PENDING`, count only `PROVEN` and `CLEARED`, and apply verdict and approval rules to every gap.
Preserve intent, scope, and existing authorization. Continue authorized work; ask only for consequential unresolved choices or required external approval. Scale depth to material risk without skipping checks. Preserve dependency and safety order; otherwise choose an appropriate verification method.
Accept equivalent user or repository evidence; no other skill, named artifact, or complete lifecycle is required. Preserve source requirement and decision IDs. Bind reused evidence to relevant source versions, dirty changes, configuration, and environment; invalidate only affected claims.
On continuation, reconcile task, authorization, current state, and unresolved evidence. For long work, return a compact continuation record or update an already authorized artifact; read-only skills do not persist it. Distinguish artifact readiness, verified behavior, and external-action authority.
Prepare authorized work before required approval. If blocked by an instruction, cite its exact source and unresolved boundary; do not invent approval gates from caution.


## Tool Routing

| Need | Preferred tool | Use it when | Fallback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Package-manager detection | Manifests, lockfiles, workspace files, runtime files, and repository instructions | Always before choosing commands or update scope | Build and CI configuration |
| Outdated and vulnerable packages | Native package-manager outdated and audit commands | The manager and registry are available | Official registry, vendor advisory, and lockfile inspection |
| Breaking changes and support | Official release notes, migration guides, changelogs, advisories, and runtime support tables | Every consequential minor, major, replacement, or security update | Primary-source repository releases; otherwise mark `UNVERIFIED` |
| Usage and blast radius | Language server or host-native code intelligence | An updated API, type, plugin, build tool, or runtime may affect consumers | Targeted import, symbol, configuration, and script search |
| Safe version changes | Native package-manager commands | Updating manifests and generated lock state | Do not hand-edit lockfiles or emulate package resolution |
| Verification | Repository-defined install, restore, build, lint, type, test, migration, and smoke commands | Before changes and after each batch | CI and script inspection with explicit unverified status |
| Diff and rollback | Git status, diff, and isolated commits or worktree | Protecting user changes and reverting only the failed batch | Stop if the batch cannot be isolated safely |

Never publish packages, rotate credentials, deploy, or weaken audit and verification gates. Do not run lifecycle scripts from an untrusted package source without the environment's normal safeguards.

## Evidence Rules

- Manifests declare constraints and lockfiles record resolved versions; install metadata proves the active environment when it differs. Registry "latest" does not override runtime or compatibility constraints.
- A vulnerability finding requires the affected version, advisory, reachability or exposure context, and a credible remediation.
- A breaking-change claim requires release or migration evidence matching the exact version transition.
- Keep generated lockfile changes only when produced by the selected native package manager and expected repository version.
- Upgrade success requires repository verification, not only a successful install or restore.

## Checklist

### 1. Discover Scope and Protect the Workspace

- [ ] Detect package managers, manifests, locks, registries, runtime/tool pins, generated state, and dependency-linked workspaces within the requested update scope; expand only for demonstrated compatibility dependencies.
- [ ] Classify each deliverable as an application, library, plugin, CLI, container, or build tool so version ranges, lockfiles, peer constraints, and supported-runtime promises are interpreted correctly.
- [ ] Read repository instructions and determine supported package-manager versions, update commands, lockfile policy, and CI expectations.
- [ ] Inspect Git state and isolate the work so existing user changes cannot be overwritten or mistaken for upgrade output.
- [ ] **Run-owned resources:** Start a run-owned resource ledger with every created absolute path, worktree, process ID, cache, report, and temporary artifact; never register pre-existing resources as cleanup targets.
- [ ] Resolve the requested scope: security-only, routine patch or minor maintenance, selected packages, majors, runtime migration, or complete refresh.
- [ ] Capture install or restore, build, lint, type, test, smoke, and security-audit baseline before editing.
- [ ] Record pre-existing failures, advisories, deprecations, peer conflicts, and unsupported runtime combinations.

### 2. Research and Plan Batches

- [ ] Use native outdated and audit commands to inventory direct and relevant transitive updates without changing files.
- [ ] Separate removals, security fixes, routine updates, major changes, build-tool changes, and runtime or ecosystem migrations.
- [ ] Check official release notes and migration guides for API changes, configuration changes, defaults, peer constraints, runtime support, and removed behavior.
- [ ] Resolve environment markers, extras, optional/dev groups, peer dependencies, target frameworks, and platform-specific packages; a graph that resolves only on the current machine is not sufficient when the project promises a wider matrix.
- [ ] Check official advisories for affected ranges, exploit conditions, fixed versions, workarounds, and whether the dependency is reachable in this project.
- [ ] Search actual imports, symbols, plugins, scripts, configuration, generated code, and runtime loading for every consequential dependency.
- [ ] Identify unused, duplicate, abandoned, replaced, or platform-redundant dependencies as separate removal candidates; require runtime and dynamic-loading evidence, and explicit user approval when removal is outside the requested upgrade scope.
- [ ] Order batches by the actual compatibility graph; package manager/runtime, tooling, foundational libraries, framework, integrations, and leaves are a discovery guide, not a fixed sequence. Combine mutually dependent transitions.
- [ ] Keep routine batches small enough to attribute failure; batch framework families, analyzers, generated clients, or tightly constrained peers together only when their compatibility matrix requires it.
- [ ] Stop for user direction when mutually exclusive version strategies, runtime support, licensing, registry policy, or migration scope changes product intent.

### 3. Apply Each Batch Safely

- [ ] Use the native package manager to update manifests and lockfiles with the repository's expected version and flags.
- [ ] Avoid broad re-resolution when the request is narrow unless the manager cannot preserve the lock graph safely; explain unavoidable churn.
- [ ] Inspect install scripts, registry source, checksums, package provenance, and unexpected new transitive packages when security risk warrants it.
- [ ] Update imports, APIs, types, configuration, build scripts, plugins, generated clients, and application code required by documented breaking changes.
- [ ] Update user or operator documentation only when accepted behavior, prerequisites, configuration, or commands change.
- [ ] Inspect the diff immediately for unrelated formatting, deleted constraints, registry drift, line-ending churn, generated artifacts, and accidental downgrades.
- [ ] Inspect the resolved graph for newly duplicated major versions, unsatisfied or silently ignored peers, changed optional features, and transitive substitutions that alter runtime behavior.
- [ ] Do not suppress warnings, disable audits, skip required checks, pin incompatible peers forcibly, or add compatibility hacks without evidence.

### 4. Verify and Keep or Revert

- [ ] **Test value and boundary:** Require every test to detect a concrete defect in this product's business logic and name the protected business outcome. Prefer E2E through user or external-system boundaries; use integration or unit tests only for business scenarios difficult to exercise reliably through E2E. Reject platform, trivial-wiring, implementation-detail, and duplicate proof with no distinct business failure signal.
- [ ] Run install or restore from a clean-enough state to prove lockfile reproducibility.
- [ ] Run the relevant build, lint, type, unit, integration, smoke, packaging, migration, and application-start checks after each batch.
- [ ] Classify affected runtime, target-framework, OS, architecture, and feature combinations as required or optional; retain a batch only with local or trusted CI evidence for every required cell, and return `BLOCKED` when required coverage has no credible fallback.
- [ ] Exercise changed APIs, plugins, serializers, build outputs, and runtime paths that generic tests may not cover.
- [ ] Compare bundle, startup, artifact, or performance metrics when the updated dependency can materially change them.
- [ ] Re-run the security audit and distinguish fixed, remaining, newly introduced, unreachable, and no-fix advisories.
- [ ] Keep the batch only when verification passes and expected behavior remains supported.
- [ ] For a failed batch, distinguish baseline or environment failures from upgrade defects; repair bounded migration errors and recheck, or revert the entire batch without touching user work. Record the blocker and continue only with independent safe batches.
- [ ] Establish the retained dependency state as the baseline before applying the next batch.
- [ ] Classify each planned batch as `KEPT` when applied and verified, `REVERTED` when applied then fully rolled back after failed verification, or `SKIPPED` when deliberately not applied because a required decision, compatibility strategy, or independent prerequisite is unresolved.

### 5. Finalize and Report

- [ ] Confirm all required repository verification covers the combined retained state. Reuse still-valid results; run missing checks and rerun those invalidated by later batches or unresolved failures.
- [ ] Confirm manifests, lockfiles, runtime pins, CI, containers, documentation, and generated metadata agree on the final versions.
- [ ] **Run-owned cleanup:** Remove only run-owned ledger entries: verify absolute paths remain inside approved temporary roots, stop exact recorded process IDs, preserve dirty or pre-existing worktrees, and retain evidence artifacts intentionally reported.
- [ ] List intentionally skipped packages with exact constraint, risk, advisory, or migration reason.
- [ ] Reconcile the batch ledger with final versions, migration edits, advisories, lockfile churn, and residual risks.
- [ ] Bind each retained batch to its original and final dependency state, runtime/configuration, compatibility evidence, and any invalidated checks.
- [ ] Use `UPDATED` only when the requested update scope is satisfied and verified; `PARTIAL` when a safe subset is retained but requested work or optional coverage remains; `NO_CHANGE` when no batch is retained and baseline is restored; `BLOCKED` when safe progress or required verification is unavailable.

## Self-Check

- [ ] **Reconcile before returning.** Check item-level evidence, requirement coverage, contradictions, scope, verdict, and applicable cleanup. Correct the report or authorized artifacts. Reuse valid evidence; do not automatically rescan the repository or rerun successful commands. Repeat checks only for relevant changes, failures, or unresolved evidence. Disclose remaining gaps.

## Output Contract

Report in the user's language, in this order; retain all five fields and state each fact once. Small results may use one line per field; omit empty tables and do not copy linked artifacts:

1. **Result:** Skill-specific verdict and supported outcome.
2. **Scope:** Reviewed/changed scope, exclusions, baseline, and material assumptions.
3. **Evidence:** Skill-specific fields below; distinguish facts, inferences, and unverified claims. Link artifacts; use tables when useful.
4. **Verification:** Checks/results, unavailable evidence, and applicable cleanup/external state.
5. **Completion:** `Checklist: X/Y complete`; `Incomplete: None` or each `UNPROVEN` item's reason, outcome impact, and exact next action; residual risks and required decisions.

**Skill-specific evidence:** Managers, workspaces, runtimes, requested update policy, and pre-existing failures/advisories. Per batch: packages, versions, migrations, `KEPT / REVERTED / SKIPPED`, and verification. Include fixed/remaining/new advisories, peer/runtime/registry constraints, lockfile churn, skipped-package reasons, combined-state checks, run-owned manifest/lockfile/diff and rollback/cleanup evidence.

Attribution

levnikolaevichlevnikolaevich
View sourceMore from levnikolaevich →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Browser Extension Developer

Use this skill when developing or maintaining browser extension code in the `browser/` directory, including Chrome/Firefox/Edge compatibility, content scripts, background scripts, or i18n updates.

284722 votes

Seo Optimizer

SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality. Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors.

2192 votes

Google Official Seo Guide

Official Google SEO guide covering search optimization, best practices, Search Console, crawling, indexing, and improving website search visibility based on official Google documentation

1862 votes

Tanstack Start

Build a full-stack TanStack Start app on Cloudflare Workers from scratch — SSR, file-based routing, server functions, D1+Drizzle, better-auth, Tailwind v4+shadcn/ui. Use whenever the user mentions TanStack Start, asks to scaffold a full-stack Cloudflare app with SSR, wants an SSR dashboard, or asks for a React 19 + Cloudflare Workers app with file-based routing and server functions — even if they don't name TanStack Start specifically. No template repo — Claude generates every file fresh per ...

9881 votes

Pentest

PTES-aligned adversarial security audit for backend, frontend, and mobile applications. Produces a CVSS-scored Hacker Report with verified PoCs and phased remediation.

5491 votes
View all in development →