Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Convex Security Audit

ASecurity

Deep security review of a Convex app: authorization model, data access paths per table, HTTP action exposure, rate limiting, file storage access, scheduled function trust, and a written findings report. Use before launch, after an incident, or when the user asks for a full audit rather than a quick check.

405 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/28/2026
ai-agentsrustgobashapibackendsecurity

Works with

cliapi

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/28/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add waynesutton/builder-skills --skill convex-security-audit --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Convex Security Audit?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Convex Security Audit
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/waynesutton-convex-security-audit-builder-skills/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/waynesutton-convex-security-audit-builder-skills)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Files
SKILL.md
---
name: convex-security-audit
description: Deep security review of a Convex app: authorization model, data access paths per table, HTTP action exposure, rate limiting, file storage access, scheduled function trust, and a written findings report. Use before launch, after an incident, or when the user asks for a full audit rather than a quick check.
---

# Convex security audit

Produces a written findings report covering every public function, every table, and every entry point (HTTP routes, file storage, scheduler). The one rule: every exported `query`, `mutation`, and `action` is a public endpoint anyone on the internet can call with any arguments, so each one must prove who the caller is and what they may touch.

For a ten minute pass, use convex-security-check instead. This skill is the slow, complete version.

## When to reach for this

- Before a production launch or a major release
- After an incident, a leaked key, or suspicious data access
- When the codebase has grown past a handful of public functions and nobody has mapped who can call what
- When adding multi tenant, admin, or billing features
- When the user asks for "a full audit", "security review", or "check the whole backend"

## Reference files

- [references/authorization-patterns.md](references/authorization-patterns.md): open when fixing findings, it has the `getCurrentUser` helper, `customQuery` and `customMutation` wrappers for authed, admin, and tenant scoped access, ownership checks through indexes, and role checks.
- [references/attack-surface.md](references/attack-surface.md): open during steps 4 through 7, it covers HTTP actions, storage URL leakage, scheduler trust, rate limiting with `@convex-dev/rate-limiter`, secrets in env, and client supplied IDs.
- [references/audit-report-template.md](references/audit-report-template.md): open at step 8, it is the findings template and the per table data access matrix to fill in.

## Audit procedure

Work through the steps in order. Record every finding as you go. Do not fix anything until the inventory is complete; fixing early hides the shape of the problem.

### 1. Inventory public functions

List every exported `query`, `mutation`, and `action`. These are the attack surface.

```bash
rg -n "export const \w+ = (query|mutation|action)\(" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
```

For each one write down: file, name, type, whether a client needs to call it, and whether it is costly (sends email, calls an LLM, creates records) and so needs a rate limit. Anything only called by other Convex functions, crons, or the scheduler should be `internalQuery`, `internalMutation`, or `internalAction`. Flag each of those as a finding.

### 2. Map auth per function

For every public function from step 1, answer: does it call `ctx.auth.getUserIdentity()` (or a helper that does) before reading or writing? Which functions are intentionally anonymous?

```bash
rg -l "= (query|mutation|action)\(" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**' \
  | xargs rg -L "getUserIdentity|getCurrentUser|authedQuery|authedMutation"
```

Files that print here contain public functions with no auth call anywhere in the file. Read each one. Anonymous is fine for a public blog list. It is a critical finding for anything that returns or writes user data.

Check that auth helpers throw or return early on a missing identity, and that role checks read the role from your `users` table, not from client arguments.

### 3. Map data access per table

For every table in `convex/schema.ts`, list which public functions read it, which write it, and what condition scopes the access (owner ID, org membership, role, public flag). Fill in the data access matrix from the report template.

Look for:

- Reads with no scoping: `ctx.db.query("table").collect()` inside a public function
- `ctx.db.get(args.someId)` followed by a return or patch with no ownership comparison
- Ownership compared against a spoofable value (email, display name) instead of `user._id`
- `.filter()` used for scoping instead of `.withIndex()`; this usually means the scoping was an afterthought
- Return validators that leak fields: `v.any()`, or spreading a full document that carries `passwordHash`, `stripeCustomerId`, or internal flags

```bash
rg -n "v\.any\(\)" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
rg -n "ctx\.db\.(get|patch|delete|replace)\(args\." convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
```

### 4. Review http.ts

Every route in `convex/http.ts` is reachable without a Convex client. For each route check: how is the caller verified (webhook signature, bearer token, `ctx.auth.getUserIdentity()`), is the body validated before use, and does it call only `internal.*` functions with data it has already verified?

```bash
rg -n "http\.route|httpAction\(" convex/http.ts
```

Webhook handlers that skip signature verification are critical. Routes that call `api.*` functions from inside an `httpAction` may be bypassing auth those functions assume they have.

### 5. Review file storage

Find where upload URLs are generated and where file URLs are returned.

```bash
rg -n "storage\.(generateUploadUrl|getUrl|delete)" convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
```

`generateUploadUrl` in a public mutation with no auth lets anyone fill your storage. A query that returns `ctx.storage.getUrl(args.fileId)` for any ID the client passes is a data leak; the URL works for anyone who holds it.

### 6. Review scheduled and internal boundaries

Internal functions skip auth by design. The question is whether anything schedules them with unverified input.

```bash
rg -n "(runAfter|runAt|runMutation|runAction|interval|cron)\([^)]*\bapi\." convex --glob '!**/_generated/**'
```

Scheduling an `api.*` function is a finding: use `internal.*`. Then trace each `internal.*` call site back to the public function or route that triggered it and confirm the caller validated ownership before scheduling.

### 7. Review env and secrets

```bash
rg -n -i "(sk_live|sk_test|whsec_|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|-----BEGIN|api[_-]?key\s*[:=]\s*['\"][A-Za-z0-9])" convex src --glob '!**/_generated/**'
rg -n "process\.env\." convex src --glob '!**/_generated/**'
```

Secrets belong in Convex environment variables (`npx convex env set NAME value`), read through `process.env` in the action or HTTP action that makes the external call. A secret literal in source is critical. Anything read from `process.env` in client code (`src/`) is public; only non secret `VITE_` or `NEXT_PUBLIC_` values belong there. Confirm dev and prod deployments use different keys.

### 8. Write the report

Fill in [references/audit-report-template.md](references/audit-report-template.md). One finding per issue, ordered by severity, each with location, evidence, and a concrete fix. Include the data access matrix. Finish with the list of public functions reviewed and judged correctly anonymous, so the next auditor does not repeat that work.

## Severity scale

| Severity | Meaning | Examples |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Critical | Any anonymous caller can read or change other users' data, or a secret is exposed | Public mutation patches a document by client supplied ID with no ownership check; API key in source; webhook with no signature check |
| High | An authenticated user can reach data or actions outside their scope | Missing org membership check in a multi tenant query; admin function reads role from client args |
| Medium | Defense in depth gap with no direct exploit today | Public function that should be internal; no rate limit on a costly action; upload URL with no auth |
| Low | Hygiene | `v.any()` on a non sensitive arg; missing return validator; `.filter()` where an index exists |

## Example finding

```
Severity: Critical
Location: convex/tasks.ts, updateTask (mutation, public)
Evidence: handler calls ctx.db.patch(args.taskId, { title: args.title }) after
  requireAuth(ctx) but never compares task.userId to the caller. Any signed in
  user can rename any task by guessing or capturing an ID.
Fix: load the task, compare task.userId to user._id, throw on mismatch. See
  references/authorization-patterns.md, "Ownership checks".
Verified: reproduced by calling updateTask with another user's task ID from the
  dashboard function runner.
```

## Common mistakes

| Mistake | Why it breaks | Do this instead |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Treating `internalMutation` as safe without tracing callers | The public function that schedules it may pass unverified IDs | Audit the scheduling call site, not just the internal function |
| Checking auth only in the UI | Anyone can call the function from the dashboard or a script | Every public handler checks identity itself |
| Comparing ownership to `identity.email` | Emails can be reused or unverified across providers | Compare to `user._id` looked up via `tokenIdentifier` |
| Mixing `return null` and `throw` for the same case | Leaks record existence through response differences | In queries, return `null` for both "not found" and "not yours" |
| Rate limiting only in the client | Attackers skip the client | Use `@convex-dev/rate-limiter` inside the mutation or action |
| Signing off after fixes without re running the greps | Fixes often move the problem | Re run steps 1 through 7 after remediation |

## Checklist

- [ ] Every exported `query`, `mutation`, `action` is listed with its intended caller
- [ ] Every function that should be internal is `internal*`
- [ ] Every public function either checks identity or is documented as intentionally anonymous
- [ ] Every table has a filled row in the data access matrix
- [ ] Every `http.ts` route verifies its caller and validates its body
- [ ] Upload URL generation and file URL reads are gated by ownership
- [ ] No `api.*` reference inside scheduler, cron, or `ctx.run*` calls
- [ ] No secret literals in source; dev and prod use different keys
- [ ] Costly or abusable mutations and actions are rate limited
- [ ] Report written with severity, location, evidence, and fix for each finding

## Docs

- https://docs.convex.dev/llms.txt
- https://docs.convex.dev/auth/functions-auth
- https://docs.convex.dev/functions/internal-functions
- https://docs.convex.dev/functions/http-actions
- https://docs.convex.dev/production/environment-variables

Attribution

waynesuttonwaynesutton
View sourceMore from waynesutton →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

695601 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →