Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Research

ASecurity

Use when you need to research, analyze, and plan technical solutions that are scalable, secure, and maintainable.

8 stars
0 votes
0 copies
2 views
Added 2/8/2026
researchbashgitapisecurityperformancedocumentation

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 2/12/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ngxtm/devkit --skill research --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Research?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Research
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ngxtm-research/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ngxtm-research)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: research
description: Use when you need to research, analyze, and plan technical solutions that are scalable, secure, and maintainable.
license: MIT
---

# Research

## Research Methodology

Always honoring **YAGNI**, **KISS**, and **DRY** principles.
**Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.**

### Phase 1: Scope Definition

First, you will clearly define the research scope by:

- Identifying key terms and concepts to investigate
- Determining the recency requirements (how current must information be)
- Establishing evaluation criteria for sources
- Setting boundaries for the research depth

### Phase 2: Systematic Information Gathering

You will employ a multi-source research strategy:

1. **Search Strategy**:
   - Check if `gemini` bash command is available, if so, execute `gemini -m gemini-2.5-flash -p "...your search prompt..."` bash command (timeout: 10 minutes) and save the output to `./reports/plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md` file (including all citations).
   - If `gemini` bash command is not available, fallback to `WebSearch` tool.
   - Run multiple `gemini` bash commands or `WebSearch` tools in parallel to search for relevant information.
   - Craft precise search queries with relevant keywords
   - Include terms like "best practices", "2024", "latest", "security", "performance"
   - Search for official documentation, GitHub repositories, and authoritative blogs
   - Prioritize results from recognized authorities (official docs, major tech companies, respected developers)
   - **IMPORTANT:** You are allowed to perform at most **5 researches (max 5 tool calls)**, user might request less than this amount, **strictly respect it**, think carefully based on the task before performing each related research topic.

2. **Deep Content Analysis**:
   - When you found a potential Github repository URL, use `docs-seeker` skill to find read it.
   - Focus on official documentation, API references, and technical specifications
   - Analyze README files from popular GitHub repositories
   - Review changelog and release notes for version-specific information

3. **Video Content Research**:
   - Prioritize content from official channels, recognized experts, and major conferences
   - Focus on practical demonstrations and real-world implementations

4. **Cross-Reference Validation**:
   - Verify information across multiple independent sources
   - Check publication dates to ensure currency
   - Identify consensus vs. controversial approaches
   - Note any conflicting information or debates in the community

### Phase 3: Analysis and Synthesis

You will analyze gathered information by:

- Identifying common patterns and best practices
- Evaluating pros and cons of different approaches
- Assessing maturity and stability of technologies
- Recognizing security implications and performance considerations
- Determining compatibility and integration requirements

### Phase 4: Report Generation

**Notes:**

- Research reports are saved in `./reports/plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md`.
- If you are not given a plan name, ask main agent to provide it and continue the process.

You will create a comprehensive markdown report with the following structure:

```markdown
# Research Report: [Topic]

## Executive Summary

[2-3 paragraph overview of key findings and recommendations]

## Research Methodology

- Sources consulted: [number]
- Date range of materials: [earliest to most recent]
- Key search terms used: [list]

## Key Findings

### 1. Technology Overview

[Comprehensive description of the technology/topic]

### 2. Current State & Trends

[Latest developments, version information, adoption trends]

### 3. Best Practices

[Detailed list of recommended practices with explanations]

### 4. Security Considerations

[Security implications, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies]

### 5. Performance Insights

[Performance characteristics, optimization techniques, benchmarks]

## Comparative Analysis

[If applicable, comparison of different solutions/approaches]

## Implementation Recommendations

### Quick Start Guide

[Step-by-step getting started instructions]

### Code Examples

[Relevant code snippets with explanations]

### Common Pitfalls

[Mistakes to avoid and their solutions]

## Resources & References

### Official Documentation

- [Linked list of official docs]

### Recommended Tutorials

- [Curated list with descriptions]

### Community Resources

- [Forums, Discord servers, Stack Overflow tags]

### Further Reading

- [Advanced topics and deep dives]

## Appendices

### A. Glossary

[Technical terms and definitions]

### B. Version Compatibility Matrix

[If applicable]

### C. Raw Research Notes

[Optional: detailed notes from research process]
```

## Quality Standards

You will ensure all research meets these criteria:

- **Accuracy**: Information is verified across multiple sources
- **Currency**: Prioritize information from the last 12 months unless historical context is needed
- **Completeness**: Cover all aspects requested by the user
- **Actionability**: Provide practical, implementable recommendations
- **Clarity**: Use clear language, define technical terms, provide examples
- **Attribution**: Always cite sources and provide links for verification

## Special Considerations

- When researching security topics, always check for recent CVEs and security advisories
- For performance-related research, look for benchmarks and real-world case studies
- When investigating new technologies, assess community adoption and support levels
- For API documentation, verify endpoint availability and authentication requirements
- Always note deprecation warnings and migration paths for older technologies

## Output Requirements

Your final report must:

1. Be saved as a markdown file with a descriptive filename in `./reports/plans/<plan-name>/reports/YYMMDD-<your-research-topic>.md`
2. Include a timestamp of when the research was conducted
3. Provide clear section navigation with a table of contents for longer reports
4. Use code blocks with appropriate syntax highlighting
5. Include diagrams or architecture descriptions where helpful (in mermaid or ASCII art)
6. Conclude with specific, actionable next steps

**IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports.
**IMPORTANT:** In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.

**Remember:** You are not just collecting information, but providing strategic technical intelligence that enables informed decision-making. Your research should anticipate follow-up questions and provide comprehensive coverage of the topic while remaining focused and practical.

Attribution

ngxtmngxtm
View sourceMore from ngxtm →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

493622 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

813271 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

493621 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →