Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Refactor Builtin Tool

ASecurity

Guide and principles for refactoring built-in MCP tools in LibrAgent. Use this skill when reviewing, refactoring, or optimizing existing built-in tools to reduce AI cognitive load, eliminate internal callback tool exposure, consolidate redundant tools, and ensure strict state synchronization across the system.

10 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/28/2026
ai-agentsgorefactoringdatabasefrontendbackend

Works with

terminalclimcp

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/28/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add fritzprix/libr-agent --skill refactor-builtin-tool --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Refactor Builtin Tool?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Refactor Builtin Tool
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/fritzprix-refactor-builtin-tool-259d52a5/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fritzprix-refactor-builtin-tool-259d52a5)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Files
SKILL.md
---
name: refactor-builtin-tool
description: Guide and principles for refactoring built-in MCP tools in LibrAgent. Use this skill when reviewing, refactoring, or optimizing existing built-in tools to reduce AI cognitive load, eliminate internal callback tool exposure, consolidate redundant tools, and ensure strict state synchronization across the system.
---

# Built-in Tool Refactoring Guide

## When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

- Refactoring existing built-in MCP tools in LibrAgent.
- Reviewing tools that cause AI context bloat or "cognitive overload".
- Consolidating redundant or overlapping tools (e.g., `exportFile` and `exportZip`).
- Fixing issues where internal callback tools are exposed to the AI agent.

## Core Design Principles

### 1. Context Economy & Cognitive Load

AI agents operate within strict context limits. Every exposed tool consumes tokens and attention.

- **Hide Internal Callbacks:** Never expose internal system callbacks or UI triggers (e.g., `resumeFromWait`, `getUserAnswer`, `circuitBreak`) to the `all_tools()` export. The backend router (`call_tool`) can handle these without the AI needing to know they exist.
- **Concise Descriptions:** Keep tool descriptions brief. Avoid paragraphs of prerequisites or error-handling advice. The schema itself should document parameters.
- **Progressive Disclosure:** For discovery tools (like `listTools`), provide a compact summary (names only) when queried broadly. Show detailed schemas only when a specific, narrowed query is provided.

### 2. Consolidation & Auto-Switching

Reduce the sheer number of tools by combining highly similar operations into a single tool with smart, data-driven behavior.

- **Merge Sibling Tools:** Combine tools that achieve the exact same goal (e.g., merging `exportFile` and `exportZip` into a single `export` tool that accepts an array of paths).
- **Data-Driven Logic:** Let the backend determine the execution mode (e.g., if one file is passed -> export raw; if multiple files -> export as ZIP). The AI shouldn't have to make micro-decisions about file counts or formats.

### 3. Strict Synchronization & State Integrity

Data integrity must be guaranteed at the backend level.

- **Synchronous Verification:** Whenever a tool or configuration is created or updated, the system must verify its validity synchronously _before_ committing it to the database.
- **Backend as Source of Truth:** Do not rely on the frontend to fire asynchronous validation events. If an entity is in the database, it must be verified and operational.
- **No "Ghost" Entities:** If a registered entity (like an external MCP server) lacks a cache due to a transient failure, it must still be visible in tool listings with an appropriate warning, rather than being silently filtered out.

### 4. Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) in Integration

Built-in tools should leverage central architectures.

- **Use Central Managers:** Reuse central components like `MCPServerManager` or `McpServerService::verify_config` instead of writing raw `tokio::process::Command` or HTTP clients inside specific tool handlers.
- **Single Source of Validation:** Formulate validation logic in the core service layer and reuse it across UI endpoints, tool handlers, and agent routines.

### 5. Cross-Platform UX Considerations

- **Process Stealth:** On Windows, always apply the `CREATE_NO_WINDOW` flag (`0x08000000`) when spawning background or verification processes via `std::os::windows::process::CommandExt` to prevent distracting terminal flashes.

## Refactoring Workflow

1. **Audit `tools.rs`:** Identify all tools exported via `all_tools()`. Remove any tool that is strictly an internal callback.
2. **Review Descriptions:** Condense verbose descriptions in `MCPTool` definitions.
3. **Consolidate Sibling Tools:** Check for tools with similar prefixes (e.g., `read_foo`, `read_bar`) and combine them if their core intent is identical.
4. **Check Handlers:** Ensure handlers use central service functions instead of duplicating connection/execution logic.
5. **Verify State Updates:** Ensure any DB mutations happen _after_ successful synchronous verification.

Attribution

fritzprixfritzprix
View sourceMore from fritzprix →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

695601 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →