Use when estimating and validating the model for a Marketing Science manuscript — running structural estimation (GMM/MLE/SMM/Bayes), checking identification empirically, assessing model fit, computing counterfactuals, and preparing the replication package. Executes the analysis; it does not design the model (mksc-theory-development) or choose the genre (mksc-methods).
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mksc-data-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mksc Data Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-mksc-data-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mksc-data-analysis
description: Use when estimating and validating the model for a Marketing Science manuscript — running structural estimation (GMM/MLE/SMM/Bayes), checking identification empirically, assessing model fit, computing counterfactuals, and preparing the replication package. Executes the analysis; it does not design the model (mksc-theory-development) or choose the genre (mksc-methods).
---
# Estimation, Fit & Counterfactuals (mksc-data-analysis)
## When to trigger
- The model is specified and it is time to estimate and report
- Estimates exist but identification, fit, or counterfactuals are not yet convincing
- A reviewer says "the parameters are not credibly identified" or "the counterfactual is not validated"
- You need the replication package (data + estimation code) ready for acceptance
## Estimate, then prove identification empirically
- **Run the estimator** matched to the model: GMM with the stated moment conditions (BLP), MLE/SMLE, simulated method of moments, or MCMC for hierarchical Bayes. Report standard errors that respect the estimation (e.g., GMM/sandwich, bootstrap, or posterior intervals) and the optimizer/convergence diagnostics.
- **Demonstrate identification, not just assert it**: show the identifying variation moves the relevant moments; report sensitivity of estimates to instruments; where feasible, a Monte Carlo recovering known parameters or a sensitivity-of-estimates-to-moments analysis strengthens the claim.
- **First-stage/instrument strength** for IV/GMM; relevance and exclusion discussed.
## Assess model fit before trusting counterfactuals
- Report **in-sample fit** (predicted vs. actual shares/prices/moments) and, where possible, **out-of-sample or holdout** validation.
- Check **economic plausibility** of estimates (own-/cross-price elasticities, margins implied by supply FOCs, discount factors) against priors and institutional facts.
- For Bayesian models, report convergence (R-hat, effective sample size) and posterior predictive checks.
## Counterfactuals are the payoff
- Re-solve the model under the policy/counterfactual, holding fixed only what theory says is fixed; recompute equilibrium prices/quantities where firms re-optimize.
- Report **magnitudes with uncertainty** (delta-method or simulation-based intervals), and decompose the mechanism driving the result.
- Discuss the scope and assumptions under which the counterfactual is valid.
## Robustness
- Alternative specifications (functional form, instruments, heterogeneity), subsamples, and alternative normalizations.
- Show the headline result and key counterfactual survive the changes a referee will request.
## Replication package (plan now, deposit on acceptance)
Per the Marketing Science Replication and Disclosure Policy, accepted papers submit **data and estimation code** sufficient for a peer to reproduce the essential content. For licensed data (NielsenIQ, Compustat, CRSP, Census), provide access instructions and the linking/build code rather than raw data. Keep a master script regenerating every table, figure, and counterfactual.
## Checklist
- [ ] Estimator run; appropriate SEs and convergence diagnostics reported
- [ ] Identification shown empirically (sensitivity/Monte Carlo/first stage)
- [ ] In-sample fit and (where possible) holdout/out-of-sample validation
- [ ] Estimates economically plausible (elasticities, margins, discount factor)
- [ ] Counterfactual re-solves equilibrium; magnitudes with uncertainty + mechanism
- [ ] Robustness to specification/instruments/normalization
- [ ] Replication package (code + data access/build) prepared
## Anti-patterns
- Reporting point estimates with no identification or fit evidence.
- A counterfactual that holds firm behavior fixed when firms would re-optimize.
- Elasticities/margins that are economically implausible, unaddressed.
- "Code available on request" instead of a replication-ready package.
## Output format
```
【Estimator】GMM / MLE-SMLE / SMM / Bayes; SEs + convergence
【Identification evidence】sensitivity / Monte Carlo / first stage
【Fit】in-sample + holdout; economic plausibility of estimates
【Counterfactual】policy re-solved; magnitude ± uncertainty; mechanism
【Robustness】specs/instruments/normalizations
【Replication】data+code package status (licensed-data handling)
【Next step】mksc-contribution-framing
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!