Use to frame the contribution of a Journal of Financial Intermediation paper around what it teaches about intermediation — the institution, the friction, the mechanism, and the economic consequence — so it clears the desk screen and reads as banking, not generic finance. It frames; it does not write the paper.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfi-contribution-framing --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jfi Contribution Framing?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jfi-contribution-framing)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jfi-contribution-framing
description: Use to frame the contribution of a Journal of Financial Intermediation paper around what it teaches about intermediation — the institution, the friction, the mechanism, and the economic consequence — so it clears the desk screen and reads as banking, not generic finance. It frames; it does not write the paper.
---
# Contribution Framing (jfi-contribution-framing)
## When to trigger
- Drafting the abstract and the contribution paragraph of the introduction
- A reader cannot tell, in one sentence, why intermediaries are central to your result
## The JFI framing bar
Because JFI runs an **active desk-rejection** screen, the contribution must be legible in the abstract and
first pages. Frame it as a statement about **intermediation**, not finance in general. A strong frame names
four things:
1. **Institution / intermediary** — banks, lenders, dealers, insurers, the specific actor.
2. **Friction** — the economic problem the intermediary faces or resolves (information asymmetry,
monitoring, liquidity transformation, capital constraints, agency).
3. **Mechanism** — how that friction produces the result; the causal or theoretical channel.
4. **Consequence** — why it matters for credit, stability, welfare, or policy.
"Banks do X" is weak; "Because of friction F, intermediary type I responds via mechanism M, with
consequence C for credit/stability" is a JFI contribution.
## Empirical vs. theory framing
- **Empirical:** lead with the identified fact and the mechanism it reveals, then the broader lesson for
intermediation — not a coefficient in search of a story.
- **Theory:** lead with the friction and the new prediction the model generates; state the testable
implication so the contribution is not purely formal.
## Anti-patterns
- A contribution that would fit any finance journal (no intermediary mechanism)
- Burying the mechanism past page 3, where the desk screen never reaches it
- Over-claiming policy or welfare beyond what the design or model supports
- Listing results without saying what they teach about intermediation
## Output format
```
【Institution】<the intermediary>
【Friction → Mechanism】<problem → channel>
【Consequence】<why it matters>
【One-sentence contribution】<the abstract-ready claim>
【Next skill】jfi-tables-figures
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!