Use when checking synthesis and characterization rigor for a Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) manuscript — purity, NMR/HRMS/IR/UV-vis, elemental analysis or HPLC, single-crystal X-ray/CCDC, and catalysis controls/mechanism/kinetics. Audits experimental rigor — it does not write narrative or polish prose.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jacs-methods --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jacs Methods?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jacs-methods)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jacs-methods
description: Use when checking synthesis and characterization rigor for a Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) manuscript — purity, NMR/HRMS/IR/UV-vis, elemental analysis or HPLC, single-crystal X-ray/CCDC, and catalysis controls/mechanism/kinetics. Audits experimental rigor — it does not write narrative or polish prose.
---
# Synthesis and Characterization Rigor (jacs-methods)
## When to trigger
- New compounds are reported and you must confirm full characterization
- A reviewer could ask "is this compound pure?" or "where is the X-ray?"
- A mechanism is claimed but only proposed, not tested
- Catalysis scope/selectivity is reported and controls are unclear
## Characterization rigor by claim type
JACS requires that **claims are fully supported by characterization data and
appropriate controls**. Match the data package to what you assert.
### Every new, isolable compound
- [ ] **¹H NMR** — solvent, field; δ (ppm), multiplicity, J (Hz), integration
- [ ] **¹³C{¹H} NMR** — all resolvable carbons (note coincident peaks)
- [ ] Heteronuclear NMR as relevant: **¹⁹F**, **³¹P**, **¹¹B**, etc.; 2D for assignment
- [ ] **HRMS** — ionization mode, calcd vs found m/z for the assigned formula
- [ ] **IR** — diagnostic bands (C=O, N–H, C≡N, M–CO, etc.) when structurally informative
- [ ] **Purity evidence** — at least one of: CHN(S) elemental analysis (calcd vs found, typically within accepted tolerance), or HPLC/GC purity, plus clean NMR
- [ ] Melting point / optical rotation / UV-vis as appropriate to compound class
### Stereochemistry / chirality
- [ ] **ee** by chiral HPLC/GC/SFC (column, eluent, flow, detector; report racemate trace)
- [ ] **dr** by NMR or HPLC; specify how measured
- [ ] Absolute configuration assigned (X-ray, VCD, comparison to known, or derivatization) — state the method
### Solid-state structure
- [ ] **Single-crystal X-ray** for structurally pivotal claims; deposit CIF with **CCDC** and cite the number
- [ ] Crystal/refinement table (formula, space group, R1/wR2, GooF, completeness)
- [ ] **checkCIF/PLATON** run; A/B-level alerts resolved or justified
- [ ] PXRD for bulk-phase identity of solids/materials
### Catalysis
- [ ] **Scope table** — representative, honest substrate range (not only easy cases); note failures
- [ ] **Control experiments** — no-catalyst, no-ligand, no-additive, radical traps/clocks as relevant
- [ ] **Mechanism** — evidence-based: kinetics (orders, rate law), KIE, labeling, intermediates (isolation/spectroscopy), Hammett, ee–ee(cat) correlation
- [ ] Catalyst loading, TON/TOF, and reproducibility (replicate runs) reported
- [ ] Metal/ligand source, purity, and any trace-metal control where relevant
### Materials / physical
- [ ] Composition and phase: PXRD, EDX/XPS, ICP, TGA, BET as appropriate
- [ ] Morphology with **scale bars** and representative-vs-statistical imaging (SEM/TEM/AFM)
- [ ] Property measurement with method, conditions, and error/replication
- [ ] Spectroscopy (UV-vis/PL/Raman/EPR/electrochemistry) tied to the claimed property
### Computation (if used to support mechanism/structure)
- [ ] Functional, basis set/pseudopotentials, solvation model, software + version
- [ ] Stationary points characterized (frequencies; TS has one imaginary mode)
- [ ] Optimized coordinates (xyz) deposited in SI; energies referenced consistently
## Reproducibility test
Could an independent chemist reproduce each yield, ee, and spectrum from the
written procedure alone? If not, the procedure is incomplete — fix before figures.
## Anti-patterns
- New compound reported with no purity criterion (no EA, no HPLC, no clean ¹³C)
- "Pure by NMR" as the only purity statement for a key compound
- Mechanism drawn as a cycle with no kinetic/labeling/control support
- Crystal structure shown but CIF not deposited / no CCDC number
- Scope table that hides failed substrates; idealized yields not reproducible
- HRMS reported without ionization mode or calcd/found pair
## Output format
```
【Compounds】N new; full characterization complete for [ ] / missing for [...]
【Purity basis】EA / HPLC / clean NMR — per compound
【Stereochem】ee/dr method + absolute config method (if chiral)
【X-ray】CCDC # [...]; checkCIF clean? Y/N
【Mechanism】claimed = [...]; evidence = [kinetics/KIE/labeling/controls]
【Reproducible from text?】Y/N — gaps: [...]
【Next】jacs-figures → jacs-supplementary
```
## Related resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — instruments, CCDC/PDB deposition, crystallography and computational software
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!