Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E50 Telecommand Receipt Confirmation

ASecurity

Monitor a window of outstanding telecommands against the receipt confirmation obligation of ECSS-E-ST-50C clause 5.6.14.8, which asks that receipt be confirmed to the sender. Derive the shortest deadline the round trip, onboard processing and margin can actually meet, then grade each command as confirmed, confirmed after its deadline had already expired, pending or timed out, and attach the retransmit-or-escalate action each state earns. Separate a confirmation that is repeated or names a com...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythongo

Works with

claude code

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e50-telecommand-receipt-confirmation --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E50 Telecommand Receipt Confirmation?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E50 Telecommand Receipt Confirmation
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e50-telecommand-receipt-confirmation/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e50-telecommand-receipt-confirmation)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e50-telecommand-receipt-confirmation
description: "Monitor a window of outstanding telecommands against the receipt confirmation obligation of ECSS-E-ST-50C clause 5.6.14.8, which asks that receipt be confirmed to the sender. Derive the shortest deadline the round trip, onboard processing and margin can actually meet, then grade each command as confirmed, confirmed after its deadline had already expired, pending or timed out, and attach the retransmit-or-escalate action each state earns. Separate a confirmation that is repeated or names a command nobody sent. Use when setting a confirmation timeout or triaging unacknowledged uplinks. Trigger: ecss, e-st-50-communications, telecommand-receipt-confirmation, telecommand-confirmation-timeout, telecommand-retransmission-limit, late-telecommand-confirmation, unsolicited-telecommand-confirmation."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
clauses:
  - standard: ECSS-E-ST-50C Rev.2
    clause: 5.6.14.8
    items: [a]
    relation: verifies
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-50-communications, e50-telecommand-receipt-confirmation, telecommand-confirmation-timeout, telecommand-retransmission-limit, late-telecommand-confirmation, unsolicited-telecommand-confirmation, telecommand-confirmation-deadline]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS Communications — Telecommand Receipt Confirmation (space-systems/ecss/e50-telecommand-receipt-confirmation)

Use when the task is the single obligation of ECSS-E-ST-50C clause 5.6.14.8 —
that receipt of a telecommand is confirmed to the sender — and the question is
what the ground should conclude when a confirmation has not arrived yet.

## Domain quick reference

- A confirmation only means something against a deadline, and the
  deadline is not a free parameter. It is bounded below by the round
  trip, the onboard processing and whatever margin the operator wants,
  and anything shorter declares timeouts nobody can avoid.
- A deadline set too short does not merely produce noise. The ground
  retransmits commands that were received perfectly well, which is a
  cheap outcome for a status request and an expensive one for anything
  that moves.
- A late confirmation is a third state, not a success. By the time it
  lands the retransmission has already gone, so the spacecraft may act
  on the command twice unless the command is idempotent — and knowing
  which it is belongs in the assessment.
- Timed out and lost are different claims. A timed-out command is one
  the ground has stopped waiting for; whether it was received is exactly
  the thing the missing confirmation does not say.
- The retransmission limit is where the fault changes owner. Past it the
  command is not the problem, the link is, and the report should go to
  whoever can act on that rather than back around the same loop.
- Confirmations arriving are evidence too. One naming a command nobody
  sent, or a command already confirmed, points at a duplicated uplink or
  a counter that has slipped, and discarding it silently loses that.

## Workflow

1. Compute the minimum deadline from the geometry — round-trip light
   time plus onboard processing plus margin — before looking at any
   configured value.
2. Compare the configured deadline against that minimum, and stop there
   if it is shorter: every other finding in the window is an artefact of
   the configuration rather than a fact about the link.
3. Validate the window: unique command identifiers, no confirmation
   dated before its dispatch, at least one attempt recorded per command.
4. Grade each command against the deadline into confirmed, confirmed
   late, pending, or timed out, comparing at the bound with a relative
   tolerance so a confirmation landing exactly on time is on time.
   Confirmed here means the uplink was taken in at the spacecraft's
   gateway onto the space network, which is what this function is asked
   to report and the whole of it.
5. Attach the action each state earns: nothing for confirmed and
   pending, retransmit for a timeout inside the attempt budget, escalate
   for one past it.
6. Grade arriving confirmations against what was sent and what is
   already confirmed, and report duplicates and unsolicited ones rather
   than dropping them.
7. Report the worst observed latency alongside the deadline — it is the
   number that says whether the deadline has any margin left in practice.

## Obligations

| Item | Step |
|---|---|
| ECSS-E-ST-50C Rev.2 5.6.14.8a | 4 |

## Pitfalls

- Setting the confirmation timeout from the one-way light time. It is a
  round trip plus processing, and halving it turns every distant pass
  into a retransmission storm.
- Treating a late confirmation as a plain success. The retransmission
  has already been sent, and for a non-idempotent command that is a
  second execution nobody has accounted for.
- Reading a timeout as proof the command was not received. It is proof
  that no confirmation arrived, which is also what a lost downlink looks
  like.
- Retransmitting without a limit. The same command cycles for the rest
  of the pass while the actual fault — the link — goes unreported.
- Discarding a confirmation that matches nothing. It is the clearest
  evidence available of a duplicated uplink or a slipped counter, and it
  only exists once.
- Comparing latency against the deadline with a bare inequality. A
  confirmation landing exactly on the deadline then counts as late on
  some hosts and on time on others.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

Window validation with unique identifiers and causally ordered confirmations,
the geometry-derived minimum deadline and the achievability test at its exact
bound, the four command states including the exact-deadline cases, the
retransmit-and-escalate action ladder, duplicate and unsolicited confirmation
grading, the verdict ordering that puts an unachievable deadline above every
command state, and the worst-latency report are exercised by the gate 3
contract test:
scripts/test_e50_telecommand_receipt_confirmation.py against
scripts/e50_telecommand_receipt_confirmation_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline).
Run:
python3 scripts/test_e50_telecommand_receipt_confirmation.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →