Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

E4008 Interface Link

ASecurity

Validate the interface links of an SMP Level-2 assembly artefact against ECSS-E-ST-40-08C clause 5.2.7.2: confirm the consumer endpoint names a reference its type declares, the provider endpoint names an interface its type publishes, the published interface is the required type or derives from it, the bindings into each reference stay inside the upper multiplicity, every mandatory reference reaches its lower multiplicity, no provider interface is bound into one reference twice, and no referen...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
ai-agentspythontesting

Works with

claude codecli

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ashfordeOU/aero-agent-skills --skill e4008-interface-link --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E4008 Interface Link?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E4008 Interface Link
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ashfordeou-e4008-interface-link/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ashfordeou-e4008-interface-link)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: e4008-interface-link
description: "Validate the interface links of an SMP Level-2 assembly artefact against ECSS-E-ST-40-08C clause 5.2.7.2: confirm the consumer endpoint names a reference its type declares, the provider endpoint names an interface its type publishes, the published interface is the required type or derives from it, the bindings into each reference stay inside the upper multiplicity, every mandatory reference reaches its lower multiplicity, no provider interface is bound into one reference twice, and no reference is satisfied by its own instance. Use when an assembly leaves a required interface unresolved or a binding is refused at build time. Trigger: ecss, e-st-40-08c, smp-level-2, assembly-interface-link, component-reference-binding, interface-multiplicity-check, interface-derivation-match, unresolved-mandatory-reference."
license: Apache-2.0
compliance: STANDARDS-REF
standards:
  - id: ecss
    reference-only: true
gated: false
domain: space-systems
pack: space-systems
compatibility: "agentskills.io SKILL.md; any SKILL.md host (Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw)"
metadata:
  domain: space-systems
  subdomain: ecss
  tags: [ecss, e-st-40-08c-smp-level-2, e4008-interface-link, smp-assembly-artefact, component-reference-binding, interface-link-multiplicity, interface-derivation-compatibility, mandatory-reference-resolution]
  version: 0.1.0
  author: Aero Agent Skills
---

# ECSS SMP L2 — Interface Link (space-systems/ecss/e4008-interface-link)

Use when the task is an interface link of an SMP Level-2 assembly artefact per
ECSS-E-ST-40-08C clause 5.2.7.2 — binding a reference that one component
requires to an interface another component publishes, and deciding whether the
binding is admissible before the simulator is built.

## Domain quick reference

- An interface link has two asymmetric ends. The consumer end names a
  *reference*: an interface the component needs in order to work. The provider
  end names an *interface* the other component publishes. Swapping the roles
  produces a link that reads plausibly and resolves to nothing.
- Type agreement is a derivation question, not an equality one. A reference
  requiring a general power-rail interface is satisfied by a regulated or
  switched rail that derives from it, transitively; the reverse never holds,
  because the base does not carry what the derived interface added.
- A reference carries a multiplicity, and both ends of it matter. The upper
  bound caps how many providers may be bound — written as -1 when unbounded —
  and the lower bound makes the reference mandatory, so a reference with a
  lower bound of one and no link at all is a defect of the assembly even though
  no link is wrong.
- The mandatory-reference check is the one that cannot be made by looking at
  the links. It is found by walking every instance's declared references and
  asking which of them no link reached, which is why an assembly can have a
  fully valid link list and still fail to build.
- Binding the same published interface into the same reference twice consumes
  an upper-bound slot for no added connection, and is the usual residue of a
  copied link whose provider was updated but whose reference was not.

## Workflow

1. Resolve each link's consumer instance and the reference it names, reading
   the required interface type and validating its multiplicity pair.
2. Resolve the provider instance and the interface it publishes under the named
   element, reading the published interface type.
3. Walk the interface hierarchy from the published type upwards and accept the
   binding only if the required type is reached; guard the walk against a
   cyclic hierarchy rather than looping.
4. Refuse a binding whose reference and published interface sit on the same
   instance unless the assembly explicitly permits self-binding.
5. Accumulate the providers bound into each reference, rejecting a provider
   already present on that reference.
6. Compare each reference's binding count with its upper bound, then walk every
   declared reference of every instance and report the mandatory ones nothing
   bound.
7. Report the accepted bindings, a per-reference multiplicity verdict, and
   every finding.

## Pitfalls

- Testing interface types for equality. A derived interface is the normal way a
  provider satisfies a general reference, so equality rejects correct assemblies
  and pushes engineers into widening the reference instead.
- Accepting the base interface where a derived one is required. Derivation is
  directional; a check that walks the hierarchy in either direction accepts a
  provider that does not carry the operations the consumer will call.
- Grading only the links that exist. A mandatory reference with no link is
  invisible to any per-link loop, and it is the most common reason a valid-
  looking assembly fails during the building state.
- Reading an unbounded upper multiplicity as zero. The -1 marker is a sentinel,
  not a count, and arithmetic that treats it as a number turns every binding on
  an unbounded reference into an over-binding.
- Counting a repeated binding as a second provider. The duplicate fills an
  upper-bound slot without adding a connection, so an over-bound finding and a
  duplicate finding describe different repairs and must stay separate.

## Behavior contract (gate 3)

The reference and published-interface resolution, hierarchy walk with cycle
guard, self-binding rule, duplicate-provider detection, upper-bound comparison
and mandatory-reference sweep are exercised by the gate 3 contract test:
scripts/test_e4008_interface_link.py against
scripts/e4008_interface_link_logic.py (stdlib unittest, offline). Run:
python3 scripts/test_e4008_interface_link.py

## Compliance

- ECSS standards are freely downloadable (ESA); cite the source and
  paraphrase per standards-map.yaml.
- compliance: STANDARDS-REF, gated: false.

Attribution

ashfordeOUashfordeOU
View sourceMore from ashfordeOU →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

694821 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →