Research

Runs a thorough multi-source research process - decompose the question, gather independent sources, cross-check, synthesize - and delivers a structured, cited brief with confidence levels and gaps. Use when someone asks "research this topic in depth", "give me everything on X", "what does the evidence say about Y", or needs a broad question answered from secondary sources with citations. Do NOT use for designing a study that collects new data - use primary-research instead; for distilling an ...

Produces structured, faithful clinical summaries - either a patient-record summary with strict chronology, medication reconciliation, and expanded abbreviations, or a clinical-study summary with effect sizes, absolute risks, harms, and limitations. Use when someone asks "summarize this patient chart", "turn these notes into a discharge-style summary", "summarize this RCT for journal club", or "what did this trial actually show". This is clinical documentation support, not medical advice or di...

Decomposes a claim into checkable propositions, traces each through the citation chain to its primary source, appraises the evidence for method and independence, and issues a verdict from Supported to Contradicted with confidence. Use when someone asks "is this claim actually backed by the study it cites", "verify the claims in this whitepaper", "trace this statistic to its source", or needs an evidentiary audit of research, marketing, or policy claims. Do NOT use for a quick true/false corro...

Runs a PRISMA-compliant systematic review from PICO question and pre-registered protocol through search strings, two-stage screening, risk-of-bias appraisal, and GRADE-rated synthesis. Use when someone asks "run a systematic review", "build my search strategy and inclusion criteria", "screen these studies against a protocol", or "meta-analyze the evidence on X". Do NOT use for a thematic narrative review of a field without a registered protocol and exhaustive search - use literature-review in...

Writes a concise, evidence-based policy brief - problem, options compared on consistent criteria, and a recommendation - that a decision-maker can act on in minutes. Use when someone asks "write a policy brief", "summarize the evidence and options for this decision", "brief the minister/board/council on X", or needs a one-to-four-page document that turns research into a recommended action. Do NOT use for persuasive opinion pieces - use op-ed-writer instead; for long-form marketing documents, ...

Produces a thematic literature review that organizes a field into an argument - consensus, disputes, evidence quality, and the open gap the reader should care about. Use when someone asks "write my related-work section", "review the literature on X", "what does the research say about X", or "organize these papers into themes". Do NOT use for an exhaustive, protocol-registered review with formal inclusion criteria and risk-of-bias appraisal - use systematic-review instead. Do NOT use for synth...

Verifies discrete factual claims against multiple independent sources and returns a calibrated verdict - Verified, Likely true, Likely false, Unverifiable, or False - with confidence and citations. Use when someone asks "is this true", "fact-check this claim", "did X really happen", "verify this statistic before we publish", or pastes a quote, number, or viral post to check. Do NOT use for tracing a citation chain back to its primary origin and appraising study methodology - use claims-verifi...

Verifies that every citation is real, unretracted, and complete, rates source quality by evidence tier, and formats reference lists precisely in APA, MLA, Chicago, or IEEE. Use when someone asks "check my references", "format this bibliography in APA", "are these citations real", or "convert my reference list to IEEE". Do NOT use for checking whether the claims in the text are true - use fact-checker or claims-verifier instead. Do NOT use for writing the review itself - use literature-review ...

Structures and drafts argumentative academic essays - a contestable thesis, claim-evidence-analysis body paragraphs, a fairly-engaged counterargument, and a synthesizing conclusion - marking every spot that needs a real citation instead of inventing sources. Use when a student or writer asks "help me outline my essay", "is my thesis strong enough", "structure my argument for this paper", or needs a draft refined for logic and formal register. Do NOT use for opinion pieces aimed at a general a...

When the user needs to update Notion pages with project status, completion notifications, or resource links, this skill searches for specific Notion pages, adds content updates, and posts comments or notifications. It can locate pages by title, add formatted text, and include external resource links. Triggers include requests to 'write on Notion page', 'add comment to page', 'update Notion', or notifications about task completion.

When the execution trajectory is empty or missing, this skill provides a fallback analysis to identify potential missing data, suggest common skill patterns, and generate placeholder metadata for review.

Checks and fixes LaTeX paper drafts for citation and reference issues across multiple .tex files with a .bib bibliography file. Verifies that all \cite{}, \label{}, \ref{}, and \autoref{} commands work properly and cross-reference correctly across all files. Identifies broken, misnamed, or incorrect citations and references, then fixes them to use the correct names from the .bib file and LaTeX labels.

Use only SciAtlas search-papers to take a novice user from zero setup to a timeline-oriented research trend report. Trigger when the user asks for topic history, field evolution, recent trends, representative papers over time, or emerging directions.

Use only SciAtlas search-papers to take a novice user from zero setup to an evidence-grounded researcher profile from retrieved papers. Trigger when the user asks for a researcher's background, representative works, topic trajectory, or author-centered literature overview.

Use only SciAtlas search-papers to take a novice user from zero setup to a small evidence-backed paper search result. Trigger when the user wants a quick paper check, first-pass literature evidence, a retrieval smoke test, or help deciding which deeper SciAtlas agent skill to use next.

Use only SciAtlas search-papers to take a novice user from zero setup to an evidence-grounded literature review, related-work summary, survey outline, or reading list. Trigger when the user asks for a literature review, related work section, paper map, or topic overview.

Use only SciAtlas search-papers to take a novice user from zero setup to prior-art grounding for a research idea. Trigger when the user gives an idea and asks for similar work, differentiation evidence, related work, motivation support, or literature-grounded refinement.

Use only SciAtlas search-papers to take a novice user from zero setup to literature-grounded research idea seeds. Trigger when the user wants new research directions, hypotheses, cross-topic combinations, project ideas, or brainstorming grounded in retrieved papers.

Use only SciAtlas search-papers to take a novice user from zero setup to an evidence-grounded evaluation of a research idea's novelty, feasibility, soundness, and differentiation. Trigger when the user asks whether an idea is worth pursuing or needs literature-backed critique.

Automatically scan document reference lists and check against Retraction.

Compile LaTeX paper to PDF, fix errors, and verify output. Use when user says \\\"\u7f16\u8bd1\u8bba\u6587\\\", \\\"compile paper\\\", \\\"build PDF\\\", \\\"\u751f\u6210PDF\\\", or wants to compile LaTeX into a submission-ready PDF.

Verify, normalize, and enrich a single citation or paper identifier. Use when the user pastes a DOI, URL, arXiv ID, PubMed ID, citation string, or paper title and wants it checked.

Comprehensive patient analysis using the MIMIC-IV clinical database. Use this skill whenever asked to analyze, summarize, or investigate a patient's medical history, hospital admissions, diagnoses, medications, procedures, or clinical course from a MIMIC-IV SQLite database. Triggers on prompts like "Analyze patient [ID]", "summarize patient history", "what happened to patient X", or any request to explore patient-level EHR data from MIMIC-IV tables.

Comprehensive individual-user analysis on the GLOBEM dataset — a longitudinal passive-sensing + mental-health study of college students. Use this skill whenever a task involves analyzing a specific participant (e.g. "Analyze user INS-W_002") from the GLOBEM dataset, exploring behavioral patterns from smartphone sensors, correlating behavioral signals with mental health outcomes, or producing a comprehensive user profile from multimodal sensing data.