Claude Skills by yogsoth-ai

Chain analogies to deeper levels (3-5 layers). Each layer reveals new aspects and insights not visible at the surface.

Extract transferable structural principles from source domains. Orchestrates source identification → abstraction → structural mapping → transfer validation.

Assess analogy depth (surface/structural/systemic). Determines whether an analogy warrants transfer investment.

KAOS-style recursive goal decomposition. AND decomposition for sub-goals that must ALL be satisfied. OR decomposition for alternative paths where any one suffices. Produces a GoalTree (DAG structure).

SOP: 描述和分类无法被现有理论解释的异常现象

Tactic: 归纳/溯因路径——描述异常现象，生成候选解释，按可信度排序

SOP: 设计子问题的最优回答顺序

Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions. Deconstruct benchmarks to reveal unexamined constraints.

Search for positive deviants and extract transferable principles using Appreciative Inquiry.

Find positive deviants and reframe the problem from deficit-based to asset-based using Appreciative Inquiry.

Establish acceptability standards through RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method or Consensus Conference protocols.

Distill the strongest arguments from each perspective through Argument Delphi or Dialectical Delphi methods.

Extract and steel-man the core arguments supporting a given opinion cluster.

Detect annotation artifacts and shortcuts in benchmarks

Understand hard boundaries on the user's research — target venues, methodology preferences, areas to avoid, advisor/team requirements. Not limited to ML/AI — works for any research domain.

Present the GoalTree to the user for confirmation. Ask about reasonableness, missing elements, and priority ordering among sub-goals.

Deep WHY probing inspired by i* Intentionality modeling. Understand the user's motivation, success definition, risk tolerance, innovation preference, independence preference, time urgency, and learning willingness. The most important SOP in actor-profiling — understanding WHY drives everything downstream.

Present obstacles with their severity assessments and proposed mitigations to the user. Ask whether they can accept these obstacles. If unacceptable after 2 rounds, return to present-candidates.

Rate each identified obstacle's difficulty — overcomability, time cost, workaround existence. May optionally use search tools to validate assessments.

Standardize assignee names and identify corporate group affiliations across patent offices

Surface all assumptions, classify by vulnerability (load-bearing × likely-false), validate causal logic. Focus on dangerous assumptions — high load-bearing + non-explicit.

Build assumption dependency graphs and trace cascade failures when root assumptions are invalidated.

Tactic: Surface assumptions, sort by dependency, attack root assumptions first, then trace cascade failures through the dependency graph.

Challenge each assumption's validity — shared cross-repo SOP

Which assumptions are most fragile? — Vulnerability ranking + impact assessment of experiment assumptions

Measure how much conclusions change when each assumption is negated. Ranks assumptions by their impact on the final result.

Assumption Destruction Campaign — open new solution spaces by negating, reversing, and challenging fundamental assumptions.

Systematic extraction, challenge, and sensitivity analysis of assumptions underlying a decision to identify load-bearing beliefs.

Classic reductio ad absurdum: negate the core claim, derive logical consequences, seek contradiction or absurdity.

Systematic stress testing of assumptions — surface, classify by vulnerability, attack, assess fragility. Combines assumption-surfacing (shared), abp-vulnerability-classification, and clr-validation SOPs.

Compute overall resilience score (0.0-1.0) based on attack results, coverage, and vulnerability severity distribution.

Generate specific attack strategies for a given threat surface, producing concrete probes that can be executed.

Identify and suspend fundamental assumptions via de Bono PO. Systematically negate axioms to reveal hidden solution spaces.

Gather independent ranking ballots from multiple judges or perspectives for a given candidate set.

SOTA Performance Baseline Campaign — 5 strategies for systematically collecting, standardizing, and analyzing performance data across methods. Produces standardized comparison tables, progress curves, and headroom analysis.

Select appropriate baselines for experimental comparison

Produce final structured baseline report integrating all analysis results

Evaluation Methodology Archaeology Campaign — 5 strategies for systematic analysis of AI/ML benchmarks, metrics, and leaderboards. Reveals construct validity issues, saturation, data contamination, and evaluation protocol inconsistencies.

Systematic quality assessment using BetterBench 46-criterion framework — 5 benchmarks, 30 papers, 40 web searches

Identify and negate benchmark assumptions. Deconstruct best practices to reveal hidden constraints and open new spaces.

Systematically scan all known solutions, identify gaps in coverage and unexplored regions of the solution space.

Produce final structured audit report

Select the single best candidate from a set using WSM, TOPSIS, AHP, MAUT, or VIKOR methods.

Assess systematic biases in the evidence body — publication bias, reporting bias, and selective outcome reporting. Budget: 40 studies, 40 effect sizes, 40 web searches.

Map technical functions to biological systems. Orchestrates problem-biologization → organism-discovery → functional-model-biology.

Extract strategy principles from organisms. Identify mechanism-level details of how biological systems achieve their function.

Biomimicry Design Spiral: Define→Biologize→Discover→Abstract→Emulate. Translate technical challenges into biological questions and find nature's solutions.

Synthesize all biomimicry outputs into a structured idea report. Integrate biological strategies, design principles, and technical solutions.

Biomimicry Campaign — discover transferable solutions from biological systems via Design Spiral, BioTRIZ, functional analogy, ecosystem patterns, and evolution strategies.

Select applicable BioTRIZ principles for a given contradiction. Map to biological cases.