Claude Skills by yogsoth-ai

BioTRIZ: biological 40 principles + bio contradiction matrix. Resolve technical contradictions using biological inventive principles.

Build multi-domain bridging concept network. Creates a network of collision points between multiple thinking matrices.

Complete blend with background knowledge

Compose new connections in blended space

Construct complete 4-space blends with emergent structure. Orchestrates input-space-construction → generic-space-extraction → blend-composition.

Run blend as mental simulation

Boundary Analysis Campaign — probe where methods fail, map validity envelopes, test robustness, catalog failure modes, detect scaling limits. 5 strategies, 3 tactics, 11 subagent SOPs.

SOP: 指定假设成立的边界条件

Apply CSH boundary critique — what is included/excluded, who benefits/is harmed, what expertise is privileged/marginalized. Identifies opportunities at the boundaries.

Systematic Boundary Value Analysis: identify parameter boundaries, test at and beyond limits, detect breakpoints.

Map parameter space, generate extreme values, test at boundaries, detect breakpoints, synthesize validity envelope.

Compile all boundary analysis products into a coherent report — validity envelopes, robustness results, failure catalogs, scaling maps, safe operating conditions.

Systematically expose hidden system boundaries — CSH 12-question is/ought comparison, identify excluded stakeholders, reveal blind spots. Combines csh-12-question, jtbd-mapping, and salience-classification SOPs.

Test a claim at extreme parameter values and detect the precise point where it breaks down.

Validate analogy depth and transfer viability. Ensures only deep structural analogies (not surface-level similarities) proceed to transfer.

Optimize experiment design under compute and time budget constraints

Calculate project, feeding, and resource buffers — shared with implementation-planning

Structured questioning SOP to determine which campaigns to include, emphasize, or skip. Used during spec generation.

Build capability taxonomy, map existing benchmark coverage

Cluster papers by theme, method, or timeline. Produces natural groupings from a paper collection. Used by scoping-survey and narrative-review.

Classify candidates into predefined categories using ELECTRE-Tri, FlowSort, AHPSort, or DRSA methods.

Apply Checkland's CATWOE analysis from a specific stakeholder perspective to reveal how the problem looks from that viewpoint.

Trace UDE to root cause via IF...THEN...BECAUSE logic chains

Extract all causal claims (X causes Y, X leads to Y, X enables Y) from an artifact, producing a structured list of cause-effect pairs.

Tactic: Extract causal claims, evaluate probability of necessity (PN) and sufficiency (PS) for each, classify into necessity-sufficiency quadrants.

Build logical causal trees from symptoms to root causes — list UDEs, connect causal chains, validate logic, locate root causes. Combines ishikawa-decomposition, current-reality-tree, and clr-validation SOPs.

Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices (de Bono Challenge)

Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices to reveal historical accidents vs. genuine constraints.

Checkpoint state before risky operations, detect anomalies, and recover gracefully

Forward and backward citation tracing tactic — expand paper coverage by tracing citation networks in both directions from seed/key papers. Alternates forward (who cited this) and backward (what this cited) passes until saturation.

Build and analyze patent citation networks — main path analysis, PageRank, cluster detection

Deep claim scope analysis — decompose independent/dependent claims and assess protection scope breadth. Budget: 30 patent families, 30 claim parses, 20 web searches.

Formally negate the core claim, producing the logical complement for reductio testing.

Patent claim syntax parsing — independent/dependent relationships and element extraction

Propose a refined claim that survives counterexamples while preserving maximum explanatory power (Lakatos lemma-incorporation).

Understand what resources the user has available for research — compute, timeline, collaboration, data access, experimental environment. Every item accepts 'TBD' as a valid answer.

IPC/CPC hierarchy drill-down and lateral expansion for patent discovery

Strategy: Lewis Possible Worlds — find the minimal change to reality that would flip the conclusion, measuring how close the nearest world where the conclusion fails.

Apply Goldratt's 8 Categories of Legitimate Reservation to validate causal claims. Tests clarity, existence, sufficiency, and logical integrity.

Identify natural opinion clusters from collected judgments and characterize each cluster.

Strategy for auditing preference consistency using Consistency Ratio, cycle enumeration, and mElo to detect and resolve intransitivities.

Full crystallization strategy for users who have no research direction at all. Covers actor profiling, landscape reconnaissance, direction narrowing, obstacle analysis, goal decomposition, and north-star synthesis. Use when the user's first message reveals zero specificity about what they want to research.

Strategy for multi-judge ranking aggregation using Condorcet, Schulze, Borda, Kemeny-Young, and Copeland methods to produce consensus rankings from diverse perspectives.

Evaluate new combinations for feasibility and novelty

Combinatorial Creativity Campaign — produce emergent concepts via concept blending, multi-level bisociation, and function combination (Fauconnier-Turner)

Synthesize all combinatorial creativity outputs

Compare feasibility across multiple candidates using multi-dimensional radar and weighted feasibility index.

Strategy: 构建对比性研究问题 — A vs B 的系统化比较

Design fair comparison experiments against baselines and competing methods

Execute a pairwise comparison between two candidates, producing a judgment with winner, confidence, and reasoning.