Draft Charitable Remainder Trust Agreement

---
name: draft-charitable-remainder-trust-agreement
task_id: trusts-estates-private-client/draft-charitable-remainder-trust-agreement
description: Drafting a charitable remainder unitrust agreement with mixed-asset funding and joint-life income beneficiaries requires the lesser-of/makeup-account mechanics under the applicable charitable remainder trust rules, precise flip-trigger language under the governing regulations, private-foundation excise-tax analysis as extended to charitable remainder trusts, and a qualified appraisal assessment for non-cash contributions.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---

# Skill: Draft Charitable Remainder Unitrust Agreement with Mixed Asset Funding and Joint-Life Income Beneficiaries

## 1. Subject-matter triage
- Treat the primary task as instrument drafting, not a memo exercise: the trust agreement is the controlling deliverable and must be completed first.
- Treat the issues memo as secondary and confirm the agreement is internally usable before writing the memo.
- Because the structure uses mixed assets, successive life beneficiaries, and a flip feature, first identify every funding asset class, every beneficiary sequence, and every trigger event before drafting operative language.
- If the source set contains conflicting drafts, advisor notes, or intake assumptions, isolate the conflict before drafting and decide whether the agreement should resolve it, preserve it, or flag it.

## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting
- Drafting a standard unitrust payout when the intended structure is a net-income unitrust with a lesser-of payment rule.
- Omitting the makeup account, or leaving it operative after a valid flip when the governing rules require it to cease.
- Using vague flip language that does not tie conversion to an objectively measurable permitted event.
- Failing to carry private-foundation excise-tax restrictions into the trust terms where the governing tax regime requires them.
- Ignoring self-dealing and related party restrictions when non-cash or real property assets are involved.
- Omitting the qualified appraisal issue for non-publicly traded or otherwise non-cash contributed property.
- Misstating how the income payout operates across successive life beneficiaries or omitting trustee succession mechanics.
- Letting sample precedent language override the required charitable remainder trust compliance architecture.

## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply
- A charitable remainder unitrust pays a stated percentage of annually valued trust assets, but a net-income unitrust pays only the lesser of the stated unitrust amount or trust accounting income under the governing instrument and tax rules.
- A makeup account tracks unpaid income in deficit years and may be paid only if and when the trust later has sufficient excess income before any valid flip; the flip terminates the makeup feature.
- A flip provision must be drafted to match a permitted regulatory trigger under the charitable remainder trust regulations and must be irrevocable once triggered.
- The charitable remainder value must satisfy the applicable present-value threshold at funding, using the relevant actuarial assumptions and the actual beneficiary ages and payout structure.
- The trust should incorporate the private-foundation excise-tax regime applicable to charitable remainder trusts during the trust term, including the prohibitions customarily carried forward in CRT drafting.
- Self-dealing rules restrict direct or indirect transactions with disqualified persons; real property, leases, occupancy, and use rights require special scrutiny when contributed assets include hard-to-administer property.
- Non-cash contributed property may require a qualified appraisal by a qualified appraiser within the applicable tax timing window.
- Successive life beneficiaries require explicit drafting on who receives income first, who follows second, what happens on death or incapacity, and whether the same payout percentage continues unchanged across both lives.
- The instrument should include a savings clause that preserves charitable remainder trust qualification if a provision is interpreted inconsistently with governing law.

## 4. Analytical scaffolds
1. Inventory the source documents into three bins: operative instructions, factual inputs, and conflicts/gaps; do not draft around an unresolved factual conflict without flagging it.
2. Identify the intended CRT subtype from the instructions and draft the payout provision to match that subtype exactly, including the lesser-of formulation and the makeup-account concept if required.
3. For each funding asset, determine whether it is cash, marketable securities, or another asset class, then assess whether the transfer creates appraisal, valuation, self-dealing, administration, or occupancy issues.
4. For each income beneficiary, confirm the sequence, survival contingency, incapacity handling, and whether any age-based or actuarial assumption affects the remainder qualification analysis.
5. Draft the flip trigger only after identifying the intended permitted event; make the trigger objective, external, and self-executing, and state that the makeup account ends on conversion.
6. Test the remainder and payout architecture against the applicable CRT qualification rules before finalizing the agreement; if the structure appears tight, flag the sensitivity rather than silently smoothing it.
7. Check the sample precedent for language that is too broad, too elective, or inconsistent with CRT operation, and narrow it to conform to the governing tax rules.
8. Prepare the issues memo issue by issue, pairing each problem with the source conflict, the governing rule, and the recommended fix.
9. If the intake contains an instruction that could affect drafting order, trustee powers, or asset administration, surface it in the agreement body rather than leaving it only in the memo.

## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships
- Distinguish between pre-funding formation language, funding-recital language, administration during the income term, conversion on a flip event, and termination/distribution at the remainder stage.
- Track which provisions operate only before conversion and which survive after conversion; the makeup account, if any, belongs in the pre-flip period only.
- For successive life beneficiaries, specify the temporal sequence of income rights so there is no ambiguity at the first beneficiary’s death, incapacity, or disclaimer.
- If the funding mix includes illiquid property, account for asset administration, sale authority, and any restrictions on use or possession before the trustee can convert to cash.
- Ensure the trustee succession provisions align with administration during the income term and do not leave a gap between one beneficiary’s status ending and the next beneficiary’s interest beginning.

## 6. Output structure conventions
- Draft the trust agreement as a complete operative instrument with conventional CRT article structure: creation, definitions, funding, income rights, valuation, administration, flip mechanics, trustee powers, charitable remainder provisions, tax compliance, and miscellaneous provisions.
- Include the lesser-of payout language, makeup account mechanics, flip trigger and irrevocability language, charitable beneficiary provisions, self-dealing prohibitions, taxable-expenditure restrictions, excise-tax reference language, and a saving clause.
- Address mixed-asset funding with asset-specific administration language where needed, especially for valuation, sale authority, retention, and use restrictions.
- Address successive income beneficiaries with explicit first-life and second-life provisions, including trustee succession or substitution mechanics if the intake calls for them.
- In the issues memo, identify each drafting problem, explain the source-document conflict or gap, cite the controlling authority by name and section or regulation, and state the recommended resolution.
- Use a clear problem-resolution format for the memo and end with a concise Recommended Actions section assigning the next step to the responsible role and tying it to the drafting closeout.
- Before finishing, verify that the trust agreement file is the primary, non-empty deliverable and that the memo is completed only after the agreement exists and contains operative provisions.