Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
Scanned 2/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill agent-evaluation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Agent Evaluation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sickn33-agent-evaluation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: agent-evaluation
description: "Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent."
source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)
---
# Agent Evaluation
You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in
production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from
testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct"
often has no single answer.
You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression
tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't
100% test pass rate—it
## Capabilities
- agent-testing
- benchmark-design
- capability-assessment
- reliability-metrics
- regression-testing
## Requirements
- testing-fundamentals
- llm-fundamentals
## Patterns
### Statistical Test Evaluation
Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions
### Behavioral Contract Testing
Define and test agent behavioral invariants
### Adversarial Testing
Actively try to break agent behavior
## Anti-Patterns
### ❌ Single-Run Testing
### ❌ Only Happy Path Tests
### ❌ Output String Matching
## ⚠️ Sharp Edges
| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation |
| Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation |
| Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming |
| Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation |
## Related Skills
Works well with: `multi-agent-orchestration`, `agent-communication`, `autonomous-agents`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!