Hardening for Dockerfiles, OCI images, Kubernetes manifests, and Helm charts. Use when generating a Dockerfile or image build, writing Kubernetes, Helm, or Kustomize manifests, or reviewing container changes in a pull request.
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill container-security --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Container Security?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/shieldnet-360-container-security)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: container-security
description: "Hardening for Dockerfiles, OCI images, Kubernetes manifests, and Helm charts. Use when generating a Dockerfile or image build, writing Kubernetes, Helm, or Kustomize manifests, or reviewing container changes in a pull request."
---
<!-- Native skill bundle for agent-skills (cross-tool convention). Generated by `secure-vibe dev regenerate`. -->
<!-- Do not edit by hand; the source of truth is skills/container-security/SKILL.md. -->
# Container Security
Hardening for Dockerfiles, OCI images, Kubernetes manifests, and Helm charts. Use when generating a Dockerfile or image build, writing Kubernetes, Helm, or Kustomize manifests, or reviewing container changes in a pull request.
## ALWAYS
- Use **multi-stage builds**: separate builder/test stages from the final runtime image so build toolchains and source aren't shipped. The last stage should be a minimal base — `gcr.io/distroless/<variant>`, `scratch`, or a versioned `-slim` / `-alpine` variant — pinned by SHA256 digest, not just tag. Two bases have nothing to pin: `scratch`, and a reference to an earlier stage in the same file (`FROM base`), which is pinned on that stage's own `FROM` line.
- Run as a non-root user: set `USER` explicitly on the **final stage**, as a **number** not a name. Omitting it leaves the container running as root. K8s `runAsNonRoot` rejects UID 0 and cannot resolve a username, so `USER appuser` fails at startup with "image has non-numeric user"; any non-zero UID passes, and 10000+ by convention also avoids colliding with host accounts.
- Use **`npm ci`** (and equivalents `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`, `yarn install --frozen-lockfile`) in container builds, not `npm install`. `npm install` mutates the lockfile and resolves versions per-build, producing non-deterministic images that drift from the lockfile.
- Add a `.dockerignore` excluding `.git`, `node_modules`, `.env`, `*.pem`, `*.key`, `target/`, `.terraform/`, `dist/`, `coverage/`.
- Build with **BuildKit** (default since Docker Engine 23; `DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1` on older engines) so `RUN --mount=type=secret,id=<name>` is available for build-time credentials. `# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1` selects the frontend and does **not** enable BuildKit by itself.
- Emit an **SBOM** (`docker buildx --sbom=true` / `syft`) and attach it to the image so downstream scanners can audit the dependency set.
- Pin **apt** packages and clean lists in the same layer: `apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends pkg=1.2.3 && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*`. The `update` must be in that same `RUN` — without it there are no package lists; in an earlier layer it goes stale behind the build cache.
- Set explicit `HEALTHCHECK` for long-running services, and separately set `livenessProbe` / `readinessProbe` / `startupProbe` in K8s. Kubernetes never runs the image's `HEALTHCHECK` — probes are the only mechanism there, so neither one covers the other.
- Set resource `requests` and `limits` on every container (CPU and memory). Without a memory limit, one container can exhaust the node and take down every pod scheduled beside it — the limit is what bounds a runaway's blast radius to its own container.
- Harden at the **container-level** `securityContext` (`spec.containers[].securityContext`): `capabilities.drop: [ALL]` then add back only what's needed, `readOnlyRootFilesystem: true`, `allowPrivilegeEscalation: false`. These three exist **only** at container level — under the pod's `spec.securityContext` they are silently ignored while the manifest still applies, so the control vanishes with nothing to show for it. Use `emptyDir` for paths that must stay writable.
- Apply a seccomp profile (`seccompProfile.type: RuntimeDefault` at minimum) and AppArmor / SELinux where available. This one — like `runAsNonRoot` and `runAsUser` — may be set on the pod and inherited by its containers.
- Scan every image in CI (Trivy, Grype, Snyk, or your registry's scanner) and triage findings on severity, reachability and fix availability together. Fail the build on fixable CRITICAL / HIGH findings; a **material vulnerability with no published fix needs mitigation or a recorded risk acceptance, not an automatic pass** — "unfixable" is remediation information, not a reason it stopped mattering.
- Set `automountServiceAccountToken: false` on every workload that does not call the Kubernetes API. The default mounts a real ServiceAccount token into the container, so an RCE in an app that never needed cluster access still hands the attacker one.
- For **multi-tenant** workloads (per-user/per-customer sessions on shared infra), isolate tenants at the **kernel boundary**: a separate VM — or gVisor / Kata — per tenant, never just separate containers on one shared daemon. Drop `privileged`, enable user namespaces, and give each tenant its own network. A privileged container on a shared host escapes to the host trivially, so on shared infra that is full compromise of *every* co-tenant.
- Expose container orchestration to clients only through a **scoped, authenticated broker API** that performs the few operations a client may request (start/stop *my* session). The client must never hold direct daemon or cluster access.
- Consult `iam-best-practices` for cluster RBAC and the identity a workload runs as, and `supply-chain-security` for base-image provenance. This skill owns the container's own configuration, not what it inherits.
## NEVER
- Run containers as root or with `privileged: true` / `allowPrivilegeEscalation: true` outside of explicit, audited system pods (e.g., CNI plugins).
- Use a base image that is **past its vendor's end-of-life date**, or any non-LTS release of a runtime that ships an LTS line. EOL images stop receiving security patches, so a maintained image with open CVEs is still safer than an EOL one with none. Resolve the date against `endoflife.date/<runtime>` rather than from memory — a version that was supported when this rule was written may not be today. A dated snapshot of the common runtimes is in `references/eol-base-images.md`.
- Mount the host docker socket (`/var/run/docker.sock`) inside an application container. It's effectively root on the host.
- Expose the container **daemon API over the network** (`tcp://…:2375`, or `:2376` even with TLS) to clients or apps. The daemon API is root-on-host: whoever reaches it runs arbitrary privileged containers and mounts the host filesystem. (A desktop/CLI app talking straight to a remote daemon is the same anti-pattern as a mounted `docker.sock`, just over TCP.)
- Ship a **single shared client credential** (one mTLS cert/key, token, or kubeconfig bundled into every copy of a distributed app) to reach that daemon or cluster. Every install holds the same key — trivially extracted from the app bundle — so it grants every user identical access and cannot be revoked per-user. Issue per-user / per-session, short-lived, scoped credentials.
- Run a tenant's container `privileged` on a host shared with other tenants, or attach tenant containers to a **shared external bridge network** — the first gives container-escape → co-tenant takeover, the second gives cross-tenant L3 reachability.
- Embed secrets in image layers via `ENV`, `ARG`, `COPY`, or by `echo`-ing them to a file. Even if `--squash`'d, BuildKit cache and registry layers leak.
- Run `curl … | sh` or `wget -O- … | sh` in a `RUN` — piping an unverified remote script to a shell is arbitrary remote code at build time. Download, verify a pinned SHA-256, then execute.
- Use an **unversioned** tag as the final image base — `latest`, `stable`, or a bare variant like `python:slim` / `node:alpine`. Builds become non-reproducible and quietly pick up CVEs. The *versioned* variants (`python:3.12-slim`, `node:20-alpine`) are the recommended minimal bases: it is the missing version that makes a tag mutable, not the variant name.
- Use `ADD <url>` to fetch a remote resource **unverified**. Either `ADD --checksum=sha256:<hash> <url>` (Dockerfile frontend 1.6+), or `RUN curl --fail` plus an explicit checksum step, or vendor the artifact.
- Use `hostNetwork: true`, `hostPID: true`, or `hostIPC: true` for application pods.
- Run pods in the `kube-system` namespace, or any namespace without a `NetworkPolicy` and PodSecurity admission policy.
## KNOWN FALSE POSITIVES
- A **builder stage** legitimately runs as root, installs a toolchain, and skips apt version pins — it is discarded and never shipped. These rules target the *final* stage.
- `FROM scratch` and `FROM <earlier-stage>` are not unpinned bases: neither can carry a tag, and the stage reference is pinned on its own `FROM` line.
- A base-image CVE with no published upstream fix should not hold the build red indefinitely — but route it to mitigation or a recorded exception rather than dropping it, and re-check when the base image next moves.
- `latest` in a `docker-compose.dev.yml` or a throwaway local build is not a production reproducibility problem.
- Operators that legitimately need cluster-admin access (kubelet, CSI drivers, CNI plugins) require elevated privileges; they belong in `kube-system` or a dedicated namespace with auditing, not in application namespaces.
- Bare-metal Kubernetes nodes sometimes legitimately disable `seccomp` for drivers that aren't compatible; document the exception.
- One-shot debugging pods (kubectl debug, ephemeral containers) intentionally bypass many of these controls; they should not be persisted as YAML in the repo.
- A remote Docker / K8s endpoint over mTLS (`:2376`) is acceptable for an **operator's own** CI / build farm where each operator holds a personal, revocable cert — the anti-pattern is shipping **one shared** cert inside a distributed end-user app.
- `privileged` or a shared bridge network within a **single trust domain** (one team's own microservices, or a sim stack on the developer's own machine) is lower-risk than the multi-tenant case; these rules target the shared-host, cross-tenant blast radius specifically.
## Reference files
Read these only when the task calls for them.
- `references/eol-base-images.md`
- `references/verifying-findings.md`
Scanned 9/6/2026
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!