Tcp Tuning

---
name: tcp-tuning
description: >
  The network stack under a JVM service: listen backlog and accept queues, Nagle and delayed
  ACK, socket buffer sizing against bandwidth-delay product, congestion control choice,
  keepalive and timeout alignment along the path, and diagnosing retransmissions and queue
  drops. Use when a small request/response protocol shows a stable ~40 ms latency floor,
  when a client throws BindException or EADDRNOTAVAIL under burst, when SYNs are dropped at
  peak, when one core saturates while the others idle on a multi-core server, when
  throughput plateaus far below a high bandwidth-delay link, when somaxconn was raised and
  nothing changed, when TIME_WAIT sockets accumulate, or when someone proposes switching to
  BBR or DCTCP. Does not cover host memory, CPU and signals (linux-for-jvm), the
  data-movement path itself (io-uring-and-zero-copy), or JDBC pool sizing and lifetimes
  (connection-pool-sizing).
---

# TCP Tuning

## Purpose

Decide which layer a network symptom actually lives in — the socket options the application
sets, the kernel parameters of the host, or the path between the two endpoints — and change
only the demonstrated bottleneck. Socket, kernel and path constraints interact; they are
not generally reducible to the minimum of two configured numbers.

The specific failures this prevents: raising `net.core.somaxconn` while the Java `listen()`
still asks for the JDK default; "fixing" TIME_WAIT by lowering `tcp_fin_timeout`, which
governs a different state entirely; and computing port exhaustion or throughput headroom from
numbers that describe the remedy rather than the default.

## Workflow

Record the deployed Linux/vendor kernel, network namespace, iproute2, JDK and framework
versions first. Java examples use standard APIs available on Java 17+, but socket support
and defaults remain platform-specific. Diagnosis alone does not authorize host changes.
Select the steps and evidence needed for the actual question, reusing adequate captures and
measurements. A source/API explanation or sound existing setup need not trigger a host audit,
setting change or new load campaign. Missing evidence limits the claims that depend on it;
return a supported no-change conclusion or the next discriminating check where appropriate.

1. **Generate competing hypotheses before touching anything.** Small-write latency can involve
   Nagle/delayed ACK; local connect failures can involve ports, source addresses or routing;
   dropped SYNs can involve several path queues; one busy core can involve accept, RSS/RPS,
   event-loop affinity or application work. Each needs its own evidence.
2. **Measure the relevant current state.** Select connection/tuple counts, TIME_WAIT depth,
   write/ACK timing, per-connection `cwnd` or retransmissions for the hypothesis. Recipes are in
   `references/diagnosis-recipes.md`.
3. **Correlate before concluding.** TIME_WAIT depth against the connection rate over the same
   interval; the ~40 ms gap in the capture against small writes on sockets without
   `TCP_NODELAY`; a full SYN queue against the concurrency peak.
4. **Remedy at the cause.** Connection reuse usually reduces churn first. Changes to
   `tcp_tw_reuse`, port ranges, bind addresses, backlog or buffers affect different mechanisms
   and security/operational boundaries; choose only after proving which bound was hit.
5. **Confirm the setting actually took.** Read the option back from the socket, or observe the
   `setsockopt` call. A configured value is not an applied value.
6. **Validate a proposed change before persistence.** Within existing authorization, test one scoped change
   with an old value, rollback and comparable load. Persist only the validated setting through
   the deployment's configuration owner; re-measure throughput, latency, errors and memory.
   Return evidence, remaining hypotheses and the next discriminating check if data is missing.

## Rules

- Mainline Linux uses a 60-second `TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN` implementation constant rather than a
  TIME_WAIT sysctl. Verify the running kernel/vendor tree; reuse can make a tuple available
  sooner without changing what `tcp_fin_timeout` means.
- `net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout` governs FIN_WAIT_2, an orphaned-socket protection. Any plan that
  lowers it to shorten TIME_WAIT is wrong on its face.
- Mainline's common default ephemeral range is `32768 60999`, but distributions and operators
  change it. Read `ip_local_port_range`, reserved ports, bind addresses and current sockets.
  Capacity is per usable source-address/port and destination tuple behavior, not one global
  28,232-connection ceiling.
- `BindException` / `EADDRNOTAVAIL` before a SYN is consistent with local ephemeral-port or
  source-address exhaustion, but routing, an unavailable explicit bind address and namespace
  configuration can produce related errors. Use relevant tuple/state, bind/route and packet
  evidence to distinguish them; the exception name alone does not establish the cause.
- The completed-connection accept queue is capped by the requested `listen()` backlog and
  kernel policy such as `somaxconn` (with implementation rounding/accounting). Pass it
  explicitly when needed: `new ServerSocket(port, 1024)` or `bind(addr, 1024)`.
  Raising the kernel ceiling above the application's request adds no backlog capacity.
- `net.core.somaxconn` defaults to 128 below kernel 5.4 and 4096 from 5.4 on. Read it with
  `sysctl`; do not quote 128 as universal.
- Receive-buffer autotuning is commonly enabled. `tcp_rmem[2]` governs TCP autotuning's
  receive maximum, while `net.core.rmem_max`/`wmem_max` govern application-requested socket
  buffers; do not collapse them into one ceiling. Effective throughput also depends on
  congestion window, window scaling, loss and sender behavior, not BDP alone.
- Never compute throughput from an initial `tcp_rmem` value (older examples use ~87 KB).
  With autotuning active, buffers can grow; neither the initial size nor the memory ceiling
  directly states the effective advertised window or application throughput.
- `TCP_NODELAY` is a per-socket option with no global sysctl equivalent. Decide from actual
  write sizes/cadence and protocol framing; bulk paths usually batch in user space or use
  zero-copy, so leaving Nagle on is not an automatic win.
- Nagle/delayed-ACK interaction can create a repeatable delay (often tens of milliseconds on
  specific stacks). Correlate packet/ACK timing and effective options with application writes
  and flushes; a gap alone does not distinguish it from RTT, scheduling, batching or proxy timers.
- Treat BBR as a versioned congestion-control implementation, not a universal speedup.
  BBRv1/v2/later revisions, pacing support, RTT fairness, policers and workload mix differ.
  Reproduce against the deployed kernel and path with throughput, RTT distribution, loss and
  fairness; published results are evidence for their experiment, not yours.
- DCTCP needs compatible ECN negotiation and appropriately configured path marking/AQM.
  Host settings alone do not establish its intended feedback loop; fallback and behavior
  depend on the implementation and peer. Validate both endpoints and the fabric.
- `SO_REUSEADDR` and `SO_REUSEPORT` have different bind/ownership contracts. Relistening and
  distributing accepts are common uses, not their entire scope. Neither creates additional
  identical TCP four-tuples; explicit client bind/reuse behavior needs its own platform and
  destination-tuple analysis, not a blanket port-exhaustion remedy.
- Every externally dependent blocking operation needs a deadline budget. For a client socket,
  that includes connect and read timeouts, but `SO_TIMEOUT` bounds an individual blocking read,
  not writes, DNS or the whole request. Align an overall budget and cancellation mechanism
  with retries, proxies and load balancers; see `timeouts-and-deadlines` for that contract.
- Report metrics suited to the claim and retain timeout/error counts. Tail claims need a
  distribution with enough samples for the percentile; p99.9 from a few hundred requests is
  not a reliable tail estimate. A mean can answer a mean-only question but does not establish tails.

## References

- [Sysctls and socket options](references/sysctl-and-socket-options.md) — the parameter table
  with defaults and what each one actually governs, a scoped experiment procedure, the
  BDP worked example, and the Java calls for backlog, `SO_REUSEPORT`, keepalive and timeouts.
  Read before changing any kernel parameter or writing socket setup code.
- [Diagnosis recipes](references/diagnosis-recipes.md) — the symptom-to-tool map and the exact
  commands for connection state, TIME_WAIT depth, Nagle capture analysis, RTT, retransmissions
  and congestion window. Read during an incident, or when confirming a change took effect.