Evaluates clinical prediction capabilities on unstructured notes and structured EHR data. It benchmarks zero-shot LLMs, finetuned BERTs, and conventional ML/DL models on mortality, readmission, and length-of-stay prediction tasks. The setup tests out-of-the-box prompting versus task-specific finetuning across diverse model families. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIMIC-IV, TJH, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUROC.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill clinicrealm-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Clinicrealm Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-clinicrealm-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: clinicrealm-eval
description: Evaluates clinical prediction capabilities on unstructured notes and structured EHR data. It benchmarks zero-shot LLMs, finetuned BERTs, and conventional ML/DL models on mortality, readmission, and length-of-stay prediction tasks. The setup tests out-of-the-box prompting versus task-specific finetuning across diverse model families. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIMIC-IV, TJH, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUROC.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2407.18525
bibtex_key: zhu2024clinicrealm
confidence: high
---
# clinicrealm-eval
> ClinicRealm: Re-evaluating Large Language Models with Conventional Machine Learning for Non-Generative Clinical Prediction Tasks — Yinghao Zhu et al. (2024) (arXiv:2407.18525, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates clinical prediction capabilities on unstructured notes and structured EHR data. It benchmarks zero-shot LLMs, finetuned BERTs, and conventional ML/DL models on mortality, readmission, and length-of-stay prediction tasks. The setup tests out-of-the-box prompting versus task-specific finetuning across diverse model families.
## Datasets
- **MIMIC-IV** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **TJH** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `AUROC` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, measuring the trade-off between true positive rate and false positive rate across classification thresholds.
- `AUPRC` — range: [0, 1]
- Area under the Precision-Recall Curve, summarizing precision-recall trade-offs, particularly useful for imbalanced datasets.
- `MAE` — range: other
- Mean Absolute Error, the average of absolute differences between predicted and actual values for regression tasks like Length of Stay.
- `MSE` — range: other
- Mean Squared Error, the average of squared differences between predicted and actual values.
- `RMSE` — range: other
- Root Mean Squared Error, the square root of MSE, providing error magnitude in the same units as the target variable.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Unstructured clinical notes (text) or structured Electronic Health Record (EHR) features (tabular/codified patient data).
**Output**: Binary classification probability or label (mortality/readmission) or continuous regression value (Length of Stay).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold):
auc = roc_auc_score(gold, predictions)
aupr = average_precision_score(gold, predictions)
mae = mean_absolute_error(gold, predictions)
mse = mean_squared_error(gold, predictions)
rmse = np.sqrt(mse)
return {'AUROC': auc, 'AUPRC': aupr, 'MAE': mae, 'MSE': mse, 'RMSE': rmse}
```
## Common pitfalls
- All metric values in the tables are multiplied by 100 for readability; divide by 100 to get standard [0,1] or raw scale values.
- Standard deviations are reported via bootstrapping over all test set samples 100 times, not standard cross-validation splits.
- Zero-shot prompting settings for LLMs are evaluated differently than finetuned settings; some smaller LLMs failed to parse prompts and were excluded.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We use a bootstrapping strategy on all test set samples 100 times to report the mean±std results. All metrics are multiplied by 100 for readability purposes. For mortality prediction, DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest AUROC (97.64%), closely followed by o3-mini-high (97.58%) and DeepSeek-V3 (97.13%).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{zhu2024clinicrealm,
title={ClinicRealm: Re-evaluating Large Language Models with Conventional Machine Learning for Non-Generative Clinical Prediction Tasks},
author={Yinghao Zhu et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2407.18525}
}
```
- arXiv: 2407.18525
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!