Implement Lightning Zaps (NIP-57) and Nutzaps (NIP-61) for Nostr applications. Use when building zap request construction (kind:9734), zap receipt validation (kind:9735), LNURL-pay flows, zap splits, Cashu/Nutzap sending (kind:9321), nutzap receiving configuration (kind:10019), or any payment integration between Nostr and Lightning/Cashu.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NeverSight/skills_feed --skill nostr-zap-integration --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Nostr Zap Integration?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/neversight-nostr-zap-integration)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: nostr-zap-integration
description: Implement Lightning Zaps (NIP-57) and Nutzaps (NIP-61) for Nostr applications. Use when building zap request construction (kind:9734), zap receipt validation (kind:9735), LNURL-pay flows, zap splits, Cashu/Nutzap sending (kind:9321), nutzap receiving configuration (kind:10019), or any payment integration between Nostr and Lightning/Cashu.
---
# Nostr Zap Integration
## Overview
Build correct Lightning Zap and Nutzap flows for Nostr applications. This skill
covers the full NIP-57 lifecycle (LNURL discovery, zap request construction,
invoice handling, zap receipt validation) and the NIP-61 Cashu alternative
(nutzap configuration, P2PK token minting, nutzap publishing and redemption).
## When to Use
- Implementing "zap" functionality in a Nostr client
- Constructing kind:9734 zap request events
- Validating kind:9735 zap receipt events
- Integrating LNURL-pay endpoints with Nostr
- Building zap split support for events with multiple `zap` tags
- Implementing NIP-61 Nutzaps (Cashu-based zaps)
- Setting up kind:10019 nutzap receiving configuration
- Constructing kind:9321 nutzap events with P2PK-locked tokens
- Debugging zap flows (missing tags, validation failures, amount mismatches)
**Do NOT use when:**
- Building general Lightning/LNURL wallets unrelated to Nostr
- Implementing relay WebSocket protocol logic
- Working with NIP-19 bech32 encoding (separate concern)
- Building Cashu wallets without Nostr integration
## Workflow
### 1. Determine the Payment Path
Ask: "Is this a Lightning Zap (NIP-57) or a Nutzap (NIP-61)?"
| Path | When to Use | Key Kinds |
| -------------- | --------------------------------------- | ----------- |
| Lightning Zap | Recipient has lud16/lud06, LNURL server | 9734, 9735 |
| Nutzap (Cashu) | Recipient has kind:10019, trusted mints | 10019, 9321 |
If unsure, check the recipient's profile (kind:0) for `lud16`/`lud06` fields
(Lightning path) or query for their kind:10019 event (Nutzap path).
### 2. Lightning Zap Flow (NIP-57)
Follow the steps in [references/zap-flow.md](references/zap-flow.md) for the
complete implementation. Summary:
#### Step 2a: Discover the LNURL Endpoint
```typescript
// From lud16 (e.g., "bob@example.com")
const [name, domain] = lud16.split("@");
const url = `https://${domain}/.well-known/lnurlp/${name}`;
const res = await fetch(url);
const lnurlPayData = await res.json();
// Verify Nostr support
if (!lnurlPayData.allowsNostr || !lnurlPayData.nostrPubkey) {
throw new Error("Recipient does not support Nostr zaps");
}
```
**Critical checks on the LNURL response:**
- `allowsNostr` MUST be `true`
- `nostrPubkey` MUST be a valid 32-byte hex public key
- Save `callback`, `minSendable`, `maxSendable` for later use
#### Step 2b: Construct the Zap Request (kind:9734)
```json
{
"kind": 9734,
"content": "Optional zap comment",
"tags": [
["relays", "wss://relay1.example.com", "wss://relay2.example.com"],
["amount", "21000"],
["lnurl", "lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7..."],
["p", "<recipient-pubkey-hex>"],
["e", "<event-id-hex>"],
["k", "<event-kind-string>"]
]
}
```
**Required tags:** `relays` (list of relay URLs), `p` (recipient pubkey).
**Recommended tags:** `amount` (millisats as string), `lnurl` (bech32-encoded).
**Optional tags:** `e` (event being zapped), `a` (addressable event coordinate),
`k` (kind of zapped event as string).
**Critical:** The zap request is NOT published to relays. It is sent to the
LNURL callback URL.
#### Step 2c: Send to Callback and Get Invoice
```typescript
const zapRequestEncoded = encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(signedZapRequest));
const url =
`${callback}?amount=${amountMsats}&nostr=${zapRequestEncoded}&lnurl=${lnurlBech32}`;
const { pr: invoice } = await fetch(url).then((r) => r.json());
```
#### Step 2d: Pay the Invoice
Pass the bolt11 invoice to a Lightning wallet for payment. After payment, the
recipient's LNURL server creates and publishes the zap receipt (kind:9735).
#### Step 2e: Validate Zap Receipts
See [references/zap-flow.md](references/zap-flow.md) for full validation logic.
The three critical checks:
1. Receipt `pubkey` MUST match the recipient's LNURL `nostrPubkey`
2. Invoice amount in `bolt11` tag MUST match `amount` in the zap request
3. `SHA256(description)` SHOULD match the bolt11 description hash
### 3. Nutzap Flow (NIP-61)
Follow the steps in [references/nutzap-flow.md](references/nutzap-flow.md) for
the complete implementation. Summary:
#### Step 3a: Fetch Recipient's Nutzap Configuration (kind:10019)
```json
{
"kind": 10019,
"tags": [
["relay", "wss://relay1.example.com"],
["relay", "wss://relay2.example.com"],
["mint", "https://mint.example.com", "sat"],
["mint", "https://othermint.example.com", "usd", "sat"],
["pubkey", "<p2pk-pubkey-hex>"]
]
}
```
**Critical:** The `pubkey` tag value MUST NOT be the user's main Nostr pubkey.
It is a separate key used exclusively for P2PK locking.
#### Step 3b: Mint P2PK-Locked Tokens
1. Choose a mint from the recipient's `mint` tags
2. Mint or swap tokens P2PK-locked to the recipient's `pubkey` value
3. Prefix the pubkey with `"02"` for nostr-cashu compatibility
4. Include DLEQ proofs (NUT-12)
#### Step 3c: Publish the Nutzap (kind:9321)
```json
{
"kind": 9321,
"content": "Optional comment",
"tags": [
["proof", "<cashu-proof-json>"],
["unit", "sat"],
["u", "https://mint.example.com"],
["e", "<zapped-event-id>", "<relay-hint>"],
["k", "<zapped-event-kind>"],
["p", "<recipient-nostr-pubkey>"]
]
}
```
Publish to the relays listed in the recipient's kind:10019 `relay` tags.
#### Step 3d: Receiving Nutzaps
Recipients query for kind:9321 events p-tagging them, filtered by trusted mint
URLs (`#u`). Upon receiving, swap the tokens into their wallet and publish a
kind:7376 redemption event.
### 4. Zap Splits
When an event has `zap` tags, distribute the zap across recipients:
```json
["zap", "<pubkey>", "<relay>", "<weight>"]
```
Weights are relative. Calculate percentages:
```typescript
const totalWeight = zapTags.reduce((sum, t) => sum + Number(t[3] || 0), 0);
for (const tag of zapTags) {
const weight = Number(tag[3] || 0);
const pct = weight / totalWeight;
const recipientAmount = Math.floor(totalAmount * pct);
// Create separate zap request for each recipient
}
```
Recipients without a weight value get weight 0 (no zap). If no weights are
present on any tag, divide equally.
## Checklist
- [ ] Identified payment path (Lightning vs Nutzap)
- [ ] For Lightning: LNURL endpoint discovered and verified (`allowsNostr`,
`nostrPubkey`)
- [ ] For Lightning: Zap request (kind:9734) has required tags (`relays`, `p`)
- [ ] For Lightning: Zap request sent to callback URL, NOT published to relays
- [ ] For Lightning: Amount in millisats, within `minSendable`/`maxSendable`
- [ ] For Lightning: Zap receipt validation checks all three criteria
- [ ] For Nutzap: Recipient's kind:10019 fetched and parsed
- [ ] For Nutzap: Tokens minted at one of recipient's listed mints
- [ ] For Nutzap: P2PK pubkey prefixed with "02" and is NOT the main Nostr key
- [ ] For Nutzap: kind:9321 published to recipient's specified relays
- [ ] For splits: Weights calculated correctly, separate zap per recipient
## Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It Breaks | Fix |
| ---------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ |
| Publishing kind:9734 to relays | Zap requests are sent to LNURL callback, never published | Send via HTTP GET to callback URL |
| Amount in satoshis instead of millisats | NIP-57 uses millisats (1 sat = 1000 msats) | Multiply sats by 1000 for the `amount` tag |
| Using recipient's Nostr pubkey for P2PK | NIP-61 requires a SEPARATE key for P2PK locking | Use the `pubkey` from kind:10019, never the main key |
| Missing `relays` tag on zap request | LNURL server won't know where to publish the receipt | Always include at least one relay in `relays` tag |
| Not validating receipt pubkey | Fake zap receipts from wrong keys accepted | Receipt pubkey MUST match LNURL `nostrPubkey` |
| Sending nutzap to unlisted mint | Recipient may never see it; tokens could be lost | Only use mints from recipient's kind:10019 `mint` tags |
| Missing "02" prefix on P2PK pubkey | Cashu P2PK expects compressed pubkey format | Always prefix with "02" for nostr-cashu compat |
| Not checking `allowsNostr` on LNURL | Server may not support Nostr zaps at all | Verify `allowsNostr: true` before constructing zap |
| Treating zap receipt as proof of payment | Receipts can be forged by rogue LNURL servers | Trust the receipt author, not the receipt itself |
## Quick Reference
| Operation | Kind | Key Tags | Published? |
| ------------- | ----- | -------------------------------------- | --------------------- |
| Zap request | 9734 | `relays`, `p`, `amount`, `lnurl`, `e` | NO (HTTP only) |
| Zap receipt | 9735 | `p`, `P`, `bolt11`, `description`, `e` | YES (by LNURL server) |
| Nutzap config | 10019 | `relay`, `mint`, `pubkey` | YES (replaceable) |
| Nutzap send | 9321 | `proof`, `u`, `unit`, `p`, `e` | YES |
| Nutzap redeem | 7376 | `e` (9321 ref), `p` (sender) | YES (encrypted) |
## Key Principles
1. **Zap requests are HTTP-only** — Kind:9734 events are NEVER published to
relays. They are signed, JSON-encoded, URI-encoded, and sent as a query
parameter to the LNURL callback URL. This is the most common mistake.
2. **Validate the full chain** — A valid zap receipt requires matching the
receipt pubkey to the LNURL `nostrPubkey`, matching the invoice amount to the
request amount, and verifying the description hash. Skipping any check allows
forged zaps.
3. **Nutzap keys are separate** — The P2PK pubkey in kind:10019 MUST be a
different key from the user's main Nostr identity key. Using the same key
would allow anyone to spend received tokens. Always prefix with "02".
4. **Amounts are in millisatoshis** — NIP-57 uses millisats everywhere (1 sat =
1000 msats). The `amount` tag, `minSendable`, `maxSendable`, and invoice
amounts are all in millisats.
5. **Trust boundaries matter** — Zap receipts are NOT cryptographic proofs of
payment. They prove that a LNURL server claims payment was received. The
trust is in the LNURL server operator, not in the protocol itself.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!