'Reverses .NET/managed malware: decompiling MSIL back to C#, defeating common
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add meltedinhex/analyst-ai-pack --skill analyzing-dotnet-malware-internals --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Analyzing Dotnet Malware Internals?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/meltedinhex-analyzing-dotnet-malware-internals)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: analyzing-dotnet-malware-internals
description: 'Reverses .NET/managed malware: decompiling MSIL back to C#, defeating common
.NET protectors and string encryptors, and tracing reflection-based loaders to recover the
real payload. Activates for requests to analyze a .NET sample, decompile MSIL, or unpack a
managed loader.'
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: reverse-engineering
tags:
- reverse-engineering
- dotnet
- msil
- decompilation
- deobfuscation
- managed-code
version: 1.0.0
author: analyst-ai-pack
license: Apache-2.0
mitre_attack:
- T1027
- T1620
- T1055
d3fend:
- D3-FCR
- D3-DA
references:
- 'ECMA-335 Common Language Infrastructure (CIL/MSIL) — https://ecma-international.org/publications-and-standards/standards/ecma-335/'
- 'ILSpy decompiler — https://github.com/icsharpcode/ILSpy'
---
# Analyzing .NET Malware Internals
## When to Use
- A sample is a managed (.NET) assembly — confirmed by a CLR header / `mscoree` import or
`BSJB` metadata signature.
- You need readable C# from MSIL and want to defeat .NET-specific obfuscation.
- A loader uses reflection (`Assembly.Load`) to run an in-memory payload you must recover.
**Do not use** native disassembly workflows (Ghidra for x86) as the primary tool — managed
code decompiles far more cleanly with a .NET decompiler.
## Prerequisites
- ILSpy / dnSpyEx for decompilation and (with dnSpyEx) managed debugging.
- de4dot or equivalent for known protectors; familiarity with common .NET obfuscators.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Confirm it is managed
Check for the CLR runtime header and the `BSJB` metadata magic:
```bash
python scripts/analyst.py identify sample.exe
```
### Step 2: Decompile
Open in ILSpy/dnSpyEx and review the entry point, `Main`, and module initializer
(`<Module>.cctor`), which protectors often abuse.
### Step 3: Handle obfuscation
Recognize and undo common schemes:
- **String encryption** — a decryptor method called everywhere; run/trace it to recover
plaintext (de4dot can often static-decrypt).
- **Control-flow flattening** — follow the dispatcher state machine.
- **Proxy methods / renaming** — rely on decompiler analysis rather than names.
### Step 4: Trace reflection loaders
Find `Assembly.Load(byte[])` / `Activator.CreateInstance`; dump the byte array argument at
runtime (managed debugger breakpoint) to recover the real second-stage assembly, then recurse.
### Step 5: Analyze the payload
Decompile the recovered stage; extract C2, configuration, and capabilities for the report.
## Validation
- Decompiled C# is coherent (named or recovered) and the entry path is traced.
- Encrypted strings are recovered to plaintext.
- The reflection-loaded stage is dumped and itself decompiles.
## Pitfalls
- Treating the loader as the payload — managed malware is frequently multi-stage.
- Ignoring the module initializer where protectors install hooks.
- Static-decrypting strings when the scheme is runtime-keyed; debug and dump instead.
## References
- See [`references/api-reference.md`](references/api-reference.md) for the CLR identifier.
- ECMA-335 and ILSpy (linked in frontmatter).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!