Canonical specification format reference. Use when understanding the canonical spec schema, field requirements, provider-agnostic specification structure, or validating specifications against the schema.
Scanned 2/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill canonical-spec-format --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Canonical Spec Format?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/melodic-software-canonical-spec-format)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: canonical-spec-format
description: Canonical specification format reference. Use when understanding the canonical spec schema, field requirements, provider-agnostic specification structure, or validating specifications against the schema.
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
---
# Canonical Specification Format
Reference guide for the canonical specification format - the provider-agnostic intermediate representation defined in ADR-115.
## When to Use This Skill
**Keywords:** canonical specification, canonical spec, spec schema, specification format, provider-agnostic, spec fields, spec validation, spec structure, YAML specification, JSON schema
**Use this skill when:**
- Understanding canonical specification structure
- Validating specifications against schema
- Creating specifications manually
- Mapping between providers and canonical format
- Debugging specification transformation issues
## Quick Reference
### Minimal Valid Specification
```yaml
id: "SPEC-001"
title: "Feature Title"
type: feature
context:
problem: "Problem description (min 20 chars)"
motivation: "Business value"
requirements:
- id: "REQ-001"
text: "The system SHALL do something"
priority: must
ears_type: ubiquitous
acceptance_criteria:
- id: "AC-001"
given: "precondition"
when: "action"
then: "outcome"
metadata:
status: draft
created: "2025-12-24"
provider: canonical
```
### Required Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `id` | string | Format: SPEC-{number} |
| `title` | string | Human-readable title |
| `type` | enum | feature, bug, chore, spike, tech-debt |
| `context.problem` | string | Min 20 characters |
| `context.motivation` | string | Business value |
| `requirements` | array | At least one requirement |
| `metadata.status` | enum | draft, review, approved, implemented, deprecated |
| `metadata.created` | string | ISO 8601 date |
| `metadata.provider` | string | Provider that created this spec |
## Field Reference
### Root Level
```yaml
id: "SPEC-001" # Required: Unique identifier
title: "Feature Title" # Required: Human-readable name
type: feature # Required: Specification type
```
**Type Values:**
| Type | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `feature` | New functionality or capability |
| `bug` | Defect fix |
| `chore` | Maintenance task |
| `spike` | Research or investigation |
| `tech-debt` | Technical debt reduction |
### Context Section
```yaml
context:
problem: | # Required: min 20 chars
Clear description of the problem.
What pain point does this address?
motivation: | # Required
Business value or user benefit.
Why should we invest in this?
background: | # Optional
Additional context, history, constraints
```
### Requirements Section
```yaml
requirements:
- id: "REQ-001" # Required: Unique within spec
text: "EARS requirement" # Required: EARS-formatted
priority: must # Required: must/should/could/wont
ears_type: event-driven # Required: EARS pattern type
acceptance_criteria: # Required: at least one
- id: "AC-001"
given: "precondition"
when: "action"
then: "outcome"
and: # Optional: additional conditions
- "additional condition"
notes: "Optional notes" # Optional
```
**Priority Values (MoSCoW):**
| Priority | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `must` | Non-negotiable, system fails without it |
| `should` | Important but not critical |
| `could` | Desirable if resources permit |
| `wont` | Explicitly excluded from scope |
**EARS Type Values:**
| Type | Pattern | Example |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `ubiquitous` | The system SHALL... | "The system SHALL encrypt data" |
| `state-driven` | WHILE..., the system SHALL... | "WHILE active, the system SHALL..." |
| `event-driven` | WHEN..., the system SHALL... | "WHEN clicked, the system SHALL..." |
| `unwanted` | IF..., THEN the system SHALL... | "IF error, THEN the system SHALL..." |
| `complex` | Combinations | "WHILE active, WHEN clicked..." |
| `optional` | WHERE..., the system SHALL... | "WHERE enabled, the system SHALL..." |
### Design Section (Optional)
```yaml
design:
approach: | # Optional: implementation approach
High-level description of how to implement
components: # Optional: affected components
- "Component 1"
- "Component 2"
dependencies: # Optional: prerequisites
- "External dependency"
alternatives: # Optional: considered alternatives
- name: "Alternative approach"
reason_rejected: "Why not chosen"
```
### Traceability Section (Optional)
```yaml
traceability:
adr_refs: # Optional: related ADRs
- "ADR-115"
requirement_refs: # Optional: related requirements
- "FR-001"
- "NFR-001"
epic_ref: "EPIC-1118" # Optional: parent EPIC
user_story_refs: # Optional: related user stories
- "US-001"
```
### Metadata Section
```yaml
metadata:
status: draft # Required
created: "2025-12-24" # Required: ISO 8601
provider: canonical # Required
version: "1.0.0" # Optional: semantic version
bounded_context: "WorkManagement" # Optional: from ADR-024
```
**Status Values:**
| Status | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `draft` | Initial creation, not reviewed |
| `review` | Under review/refinement |
| `approved` | Approved for implementation |
| `implemented` | Implementation complete |
| `deprecated` | No longer valid |
**Bounded Context Values (ADR-024):**
- WorkManagement
- Orchestration
- Workflows
- Expertise
- ExecutionControl
- TriggerManagement
- Integrations
## Validation Rules
### ID Formats
| Field | Format | Example |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Specification ID | SPEC-{number} | SPEC-042 |
| Requirement ID | REQ-{number} | REQ-001 |
| Acceptance Criterion ID | AC-{number} | AC-001 |
| ADR Reference | ADR-{number} | ADR-115 |
| EPIC Reference | EPIC-{number} | EPIC-1118 |
| User Story Reference | US-{number} | US-001 |
### Content Constraints
| Field | Constraint |
| --- | --- |
| `context.problem` | Minimum 20 characters |
| `requirements` | At least one requirement |
| `acceptance_criteria` | At least one criterion per requirement |
| `metadata.created` | Valid ISO 8601 date |
### EARS Pattern Validation
Each requirement's `text` field must match its declared `ears_type`:
| ears_type | Required Pattern |
| --- | --- |
| `ubiquitous` | Starts with "The" + entity + "SHALL" |
| `state-driven` | Starts with "WHILE" |
| `event-driven` | Starts with "WHEN" |
| `unwanted` | Contains "IF" and "THEN" |
| `optional` | Starts with "WHERE" |
| `complex` | Multiple pattern keywords |
## JSON Schema Location
```text
schemas/canonical-spec.schema.json
```
## Provider Transformation
The canonical format serves as the hub for all provider transformations:
```text
┌─────────────┐
│ Canonical │
│ Spec │
└──────┬──────┘
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
│ │ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐
│EARS │ │Ghrkn│ │Kiro │ │SpKit│ │ ADR │
└─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘
```
All providers implement `ISpecificationProvider`:
```csharp
interface ISpecificationProvider
{
string ProviderName { get; }
Task<Result<CanonicalSpec>> ParseAsync(string input);
Task<Result<string>> GenerateAsync(CanonicalSpec spec);
Task<ValidationResult> ValidateAsync(CanonicalSpec spec);
bool CanParse(string input);
}
```
## References
**Detailed Documentation:**
- [Schema Reference](references/schema-reference.md)
- [Validation Rules](references/validation-rules.md)
**Repository Resources:**
- `schemas/canonical-spec.schema.json` - JSON Schema
- `docs/adr/ADR-115-specification-provider-abstraction.md` - Architecture decision
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-26
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!