This skill should be used when designing a database schema, modeling data, choosing a database, planning migrations, or setting up multi-tenancy for a SaaS. Trigger phrases include "design the database", "model this data", "what database should I use", "schema for", "multi-tenant", "tenant isolation", "add an index", "how do I migrate", "SQL or NoSQL", "Postgres schema", "row level security", "RLS". It defaults to Postgres, models multi-tenancy safely, and enforces migration and indexing disc...
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add MartinOlivero/saas-builder --skill data-modeling --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Data Modeling?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/martinolivero-data-modeling)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: data-modeling
description: This skill should be used when designing a database schema, modeling data, choosing a database, planning migrations, or setting up multi-tenancy for a SaaS. Trigger phrases include "design the database", "model this data", "what database should I use", "schema for", "multi-tenant", "tenant isolation", "add an index", "how do I migrate", "SQL or NoSQL", "Postgres schema", "row level security", "RLS". It defaults to Postgres, models multi-tenancy safely, and enforces migration and indexing discipline.
---
# Data Modeling
This skill designs the schema your product runs on, and gets multi-tenant isolation right — the mistake that, when wrong, leaks one customer's data to another.
Analogy: the schema is the foundation and load-bearing walls of a house. You can repaint and rearrange furniture later cheaply; moving a load-bearing wall after move-in is expensive and dangerous. Get the structure right before building on it.
## Discovery (max 3 questions, only if unknown)
1. Is this multi-tenant (multiple orgs/customers sharing the app) or single-tenant?
2. Is the data mostly relational (users, orders, invoices) or document-like/flexible?
3. Are you on Supabase, Neon, or another Postgres host — or undecided?
## Step 1 — Choose the database
**Postgres by default** — relational integrity, JSONB for flexible fields, full-text search, and it scales far. Don't reach for NoSQL without a proven document/scale reason. **Every option below runs Postgres underneath**, so the methodology in this skill (tenant_id + RLS, indexing, migrations) is identical regardless of host. Pick the host by *how you're building*:
- **InsForge** — *agentic-native*. Built so an AI coding agent provisions the DB, runs migrations, sets RLS, and debugs **through MCP**, without you touching a dashboard. The natural fit when you build *with* an agent — which is exactly how this plugin runs. Batteries-included (Postgres + auth + RLS + storage + functions), open source. *(Its published benchmarks claim faster/cheaper agent task completion vs Supabase — note those are first-party numbers, and it's a younger project (~5k⭐) than Supabase.)*
- **Supabase** — *mature ecosystem*. Batteries-included (Auth + RLS + Realtime + storage), RLS battle-tested at scale, huge community and docs (~104k⭐). The safe default when ecosystem maturity matters more than agent-native tooling.
- **Neon** — serverless Postgres with branching/autoscaling; great for preview-per-PR databases.
- Redis only for cache/sessions/real-time; Elasticsearch only for heavy full-text search.
**Decision rule:** building inside an AI agent and want it to own the backend end to end → **InsForge**. Want the largest, most-proven ecosystem → **Supabase**. Either way the schema design below is the same.
## Step 2 — Model multi-tenancy (the critical decision)
**Default to a shared schema with a `tenant_id` (org_id) column on every tenant-scoped table + Row-Level Security.** Graduate to schema-per-tenant or DB-per-tenant **only** when a large enterprise customer demands hard isolation/compliance. Don't start there — it multiplies ops cost.
Make RLS airtight:
- `ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY` **and** `FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY` on every tenant table.
- Set tenant context per request **inside the transaction**: `SET LOCAL app.current_tenant = '...'` — so pooled connections can't leak state between requests.
- The application DB role must have **neither `SUPERUSER` nor `BYPASSRLS`** — otherwise RLS is silently skipped and isolation is an illusion.
- RLS is the backstop for the app-layer `tenant_id` checks in the `auth` skill — defense in depth.
## Step 3 — Schema discipline
- **Normalize to 3NF by default.** Denormalize only for a *measured* read hot-path.
- **IDs**: UUID/ULID for public-facing identifiers; bigint identity for internal PKs.
- **Index every foreign key and every column you filter/sort/join on.** Postgres does **not** auto-index FKs. For tenant tables, lead a composite index with `tenant_id`, e.g. `(tenant_id, created_at)`.
- **Timestamps**: `created_at` / `updated_at` as `timestamptz` in UTC. Prefer **soft delete** (`deleted_at`) for user-facing data.
- **Push invariants into the schema**: `NOT NULL`, `CHECK`, `UNIQUE`, FK constraints — not just app code.
## Step 4 — Migrations
- All schema changes go through **versioned, forward-only migration files** in source control (Supabase migrations, Prisma Migrate, or Drizzle).
- **Never edit the production DB by hand.** Every change is a reviewable, replayable migration.
- **Delegation & fallback:** if the InsForge skills are installed (`npx skills add https://github.com/insforge/agent-skills`), let `insforge-cli` apply migrations/RLS and `insforge-debug` diagnose issues — the agent operates the backend directly. If they're not, apply migrations through your host's CLI (Supabase / Drizzle / Prisma). This skill always owns the *design*; never block on a missing skill.
## Handoff
The schema here backs the `api-design` resources and the `auth` permission model. Pass the tenant strategy to both so endpoints and policies scope correctly.
## Output
Deliver: the DB choice with reason, the multi-tenancy strategy, the table definitions (DDL) with constraints and indexes, the RLS policies if multi-tenant, and the first migration file.
## Reference
PostgreSQL docs (RLS, indexing), supabase/supabase (~104k⭐), insforge/insforge (~5k⭐, agentic-native), AWS "Multi-tenant data isolation with Postgres RLS", PlanetScale "Approaches to tenancy in Postgres".
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!