Socratic interrogation of plans against the project's domain model and documented decisions. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan, clarify terminology, or validate assumptions against existing domain language. Updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs inline as decisions crystallise.
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add martinffx/atelier --skill oracle-grillme --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Oracle Grillme?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/martinffx-oracle-grillme)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: oracle-grillme
description: >
Socratic interrogation of plans against the project's domain model and documented decisions.
Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan, clarify terminology, or validate assumptions
against existing domain language. Updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs inline as decisions crystallise.
user-invocable: true
---
# Grill Me
Relentless questioning of your plan against the project's domain model, sharpening terminology and updating documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise.
## When to Use
- **Stress-testing a plan** — "I want to add a refund flow to the Order service"
- **Clarifying fuzzy language** — "We're calling it 'account' but is that a Customer or a User?"
- **Onboarding to a domain** — "Walk me through how the Billing context relates to Ordering"
- **Before writing specs** — Ensuring the domain language is solid before `spec-research` begins
- **After code review** — "The PR introduces 'cancellation' but our glossary says..."
## When NOT to Use
- **Simple implementation questions** — Use `oracle-challenge` or `oracle-architect` instead
- **Debugging** — Use `code-debug`
- **Testing strategy** — Use `oracle-testing`
- **Already in spec workflow** — Use `spec-research` + `oracle-architect` for domain discovery during the spec process
---
## How It Works
<interview-loop>
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
</interview-loop>
---
## Domain Awareness
### Discovering Context
Most repos have a single context:
```
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
```
If a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
```
/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│ ├── ordering/
│ │ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
│ └── billing/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── docs/adr/
```
Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no `CONTEXT.md` exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no `docs/adr/` exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
### During the Session
#### Challenge Against the Glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in `CONTEXT.md`, call it out immediately.
> "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
#### Sharpen Fuzzy Language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term.
> "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
#### Discuss Concrete Scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
#### Cross-Reference With Code
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it:
> "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
#### Update CONTEXT.md Inline
When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [references/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](./references/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md).
`CONTEXT.md` should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat `CONTEXT.md` as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.
#### Offer ADRs Sparingly
Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
1. **Hard to reverse** — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [references/ADR-FORMAT.md](./references/ADR-FORMAT.md).
---
## Usage Examples
### Stress-Test a New Feature
```
/grillme "I want to add a refund flow to the Order service"
```
> "Before we go further — your glossary defines 'Order' as a completed purchase. A refund implies the Order is no longer complete. Is 'refund' a state on Order, or a new concept entirely?"
### Clarify Ambiguous Terms
```
/grillme "We need to handle 'account' deletions"
```
> "You said 'account' — your CONTEXT.md has both Customer and User. Which one are we deleting, and what happens to their Orders?"
### Validate Against Existing Decisions
```
/grillme "I'm switching the write model from Postgres to DynamoDB"
```
> "ADR-0002 says we chose Postgres for the write model because of ACID requirements. Have those requirements changed, or is this a new trade-off?"
### Onboard to a Domain
```
/grillme "Explain how Billing relates to Ordering"
```
> "Ordering emits OrderPlaced events. Billing consumes them to create Invoices. But your CONTEXT.md says Invoice is a request for payment — who decides when payment is actually processed?"
---
## Relationship to Other Skills
| Skill | Use When |
|-------|----------|
| **oracle-grillme** | Questioning domain assumptions, sharpening terminology, updating docs inline |
| **oracle-challenge** | Critically evaluating a technical approach or decision |
| **oracle-architect** | Designing components, data models, API contracts during spec-research |
| **spec-research** | Structured discovery + architecture → spec.md (use grillme before this to solidify language) |
**Key distinction:**
- `oracle-challenge` = "Is this approach valid?" (critical evaluation)
- `oracle-grillme` = "What do we mean by these words?" (domain interrogation)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!