Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.
Scanned 2/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill alphafold --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Alphafold?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-alphafold)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: alphafold
description: >
Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when:
(1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly,
(2) Predicting binder-target complex structures,
(3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM),
(4) Self-consistency validation of designs,
(5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer.
For faster single-chain prediction, use esm.
For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.
license: MIT
category: design-tools
tags: [structure-prediction, validation, reference]
biomodals_script: modal_alphafold.py
---
# AlphaFold2 Structure Validation
## Prerequisites
| Requirement | Minimum | Recommended |
|-------------|---------|-------------|
| Python | 3.8+ | 3.10 |
| CUDA | 11.0+ | 12.0+ |
| GPU VRAM | 32GB | 40GB (A100) |
| RAM | 32GB | 64GB |
| Disk | 100GB | 500GB (for databases) |
## How to run
> **First time?** See [Installation Guide](../../docs/installation.md) to set up Modal and biomodals.
### Option 1: ColabFold (recommended for multimer)
```bash
cd biomodals
modal run modal_colabfold.py \
--input-faa sequences.fasta \
--out-dir output/
```
**GPU**: A100 (40GB) | **Timeout**: 3600s default
### Option 2: Local installation
```bash
git clone https://github.com/deepmind/alphafold.git
cd alphafold
python run_alphafold.py \
--fasta_paths=query.fasta \
--output_dir=output/ \
--model_preset=monomer \
--max_template_date=2026-01-01
```
### Option 3: ESMFold (fast single-chain)
```bash
modal run modal_esmfold.py \
--sequence "MKTAYIAKQRQISFVK..."
```
## Key parameters
| Parameter | Default | Options | Description |
|-----------|---------|---------|-------------|
| `--model_preset` | monomer | monomer/multimer | Model type |
| `--num_recycle` | 3 | 1-20 | Recycling iterations |
| `--max_template_date` | - | YYYY-MM-DD | Template cutoff |
| `--use_templates` | True | True/False | Use template search |
## Output format
```
output/
├── ranked_0.pdb # Best model
├── ranked_1.pdb # Second best
├── ranking_debug.json # Confidence scores
├── result_model_1.pkl # Full results
├── msas/ # MSA files
└── features.pkl # Input features
```
### Extracting metrics
```python
import pickle
with open('result_model_1.pkl', 'rb') as f:
result = pickle.load(f)
plddt = result['plddt']
ptm = result['ptm']
iptm = result.get('iptm', None) # Multimer only
pae = result['predicted_aligned_error']
```
## Sample output
### Successful run
```
$ python run_alphafold.py --fasta_paths complex.fasta --model_preset multimer
[INFO] Running MSA search...
[INFO] Running model 1/5...
[INFO] Running model 5/5...
[INFO] Relaxing structures...
Results:
ranked_0.pdb:
pLDDT: 87.3 (mean)
pTM: 0.78
ipTM: 0.62
PAE (interface): 8.5
Saved to output/
```
**What good output looks like:**
- pLDDT: > 85 (mean, on 0-100 scale) or > 0.85 (normalized)
- pTM: > 0.70
- ipTM: > 0.50 for complexes
- PAE_interface: < 10
## Decision tree
```
Should I use AlphaFold?
│
├─ What are you predicting?
│ ├─ Single protein → ESMFold (faster)
│ ├─ Protein-protein complex → AlphaFold/ColabFold ✓
│ ├─ Protein + ligand → Chai or Boltz
│ └─ Batch of sequences → ColabFold ✓
│
├─ What do you need?
│ ├─ Highest accuracy → AlphaFold/ColabFold ✓
│ ├─ Fast screening → ESMFold
│ └─ MSA-free prediction → Chai or ESMFold
│
└─ Which AF2 option?
├─ Local installation → Full control, slow setup
├─ ColabFold → Easier, MSA server
└─ Modal → Recommended for batch
```
## Typical performance
| Campaign Size | Time (A100) | Cost (Modal) | Notes |
|---------------|-------------|--------------|-------|
| 100 complexes | 1-2h | ~$8 | With MSA server |
| 500 complexes | 5-10h | ~$40 | Standard campaign |
| 1000 complexes | 10-20h | ~$80 | Large campaign |
**Per-complex**: ~30-60s with MSA server.
---
## Verify
```bash
find output -name "ranked_0.pdb" | wc -l # Should match input count
```
---
## Troubleshooting
**Low pLDDT regions**: May indicate disorder or poor design
**Low ipTM**: Interface not confident, check hotspots
**High PAE off-diagonal**: Chains may not interact
**OOM errors**: Use ColabFold with MSA server instead
### Error interpretation
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|-------|-------|-----|
| `RuntimeError: CUDA out of memory` | Sequence too long | Use A100 or split prediction |
| `KeyError: 'iptm'` | Running monomer on complex | Use multimer preset |
| `FileNotFoundError: database` | Missing MSA databases | Use ColabFold MSA server |
| `TimeoutError` | MSA search slow | Reduce num_recycles |
---
**Next**: `protein-qc` for filtering and ranking.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!