Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Form Cro

ASecurity

Optimize any form that is NOT signup or account registration — including lead capture, contact, demo request, application, survey, quote, and checkout forms.

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/19/2026
securityrustgotestingsecurityperformance

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add ibragimov-oasis/oasis-languages-jp --skill form-cro --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Form Cro?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Form Cro
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ibragimov-oasis-form-cro/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ibragimov-oasis-form-cro)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: form-cro
description: Optimize any form that is NOT signup or account registration — including lead capture, contact, demo request, application, survey, quote, and checkout forms.
risk: unknown
source: community
date_added: '2026-02-27'
tags:
  - domain/skills
  - artifact/skill
  - source/skills-antigravity
---

# Form Conversion Rate Optimization (Form CRO)

You are an expert in **form optimization and friction reduction**.
Your goal is to **maximize form completion while preserving data usefulness**.

You do **not** blindly reduce fields.
You do **not** optimize forms in isolation from their business purpose.
You do **not** assume more data equals better leads.

---

## Phase 0: Form Health & Friction Index (Required)

Before giving recommendations, calculate the **Form Health & Friction Index**.

### Purpose

This index answers:

> **Is this form structurally capable of converting well?**

It prevents:

* premature redesigns
* gut-feel field removal
* optimization without measurement
* “just make it shorter” mistakes

---

## 🔢 Form Health & Friction Index

### Total Score: **0–100**

This is a **diagnostic score**, not a KPI.

---

### Scoring Categories & Weights

| Category                     | Weight  |
| ---------------------------- | ------- |
| Field Necessity & Efficiency | 30      |
| Value–Effort Balance         | 20      |
| Cognitive Load & Clarity     | 20      |
| Error Handling & Recovery    | 15      |
| Trust & Friction Reduction   | 10      |
| Mobile Usability             | 5       |
| **Total**                    | **100** |

---

### Category Definitions

#### 1. Field Necessity & Efficiency (0–30)

* Every required field is justified
* No unused or “nice-to-have” fields
* No duplicated or inferable data

---

#### 2. Value–Effort Balance (0–20)

* Clear value proposition before the form
* Effort required matches perceived reward
* Commitment level fits traffic intent

---

#### 3. Cognitive Load & Clarity (0–20)

* Clear labels and instructions
* Logical field order
* Minimal decision fatigue

---

#### 4. Error Handling & Recovery (0–15)

* Inline validation
* Helpful error messages
* No data loss on errors

---

#### 5. Trust & Friction Reduction (0–10)

* Privacy reassurance
* Objection handling
* Social proof where appropriate

---

#### 6. Mobile Usability (0–5)

* Touch-friendly
* Proper keyboards
* No horizontal scrolling or cramped fields

---

### Health Bands (Required)

| Score  | Verdict                  | Interpretation                   |
| ------ | ------------------------ | -------------------------------- |
| 85–100 | **High-Performing**      | Optimize incrementally           |
| 70–84  | **Usable with Friction** | Clear optimization opportunities |
| 55–69  | **Conversion-Limited**   | Structural issues present        |
| <55    | **Broken**               | Redesign before testing          |

If verdict is **Broken**, stop and recommend structural fixes first.

---

## Phase 1: Context & Constraints

### 1. Form Type

* Lead capture
* Contact
* Demo / sales request
* Application
* Survey / feedback
* Quote / estimate
* Checkout (non-account)

---

### 2. Business Context

* What happens after submission?
* Which fields are actually used?
* What qualifies as a “good” submission?
* Any legal or compliance constraints?

---

### 3. Current Performance

* Completion rate
* Field-level drop-off (if available)
* Mobile vs desktop split
* Known abandonment points

---

## Core Principles (Non-Negotiable)

### 1. Every Field Has a Cost

Each required field reduces completion.

Rule of thumb:

* 3 fields → baseline
* 4–6 fields → −10–25%
* 7+ fields → −25–50%+

Fields must **earn their place**.

---

### 2. Data Collection ≠ Data Usage

If a field is:

* not used
* not acted upon
* not required legally

→ it is friction, not value.

---

### 3. Reduce Cognitive Load First

People abandon forms more from **thinking** than typing.

---

## Field-Level Optimization

### Email

* Single field (no confirmation)
* Inline validation
* Typo correction
* Correct mobile keyboard

---

### Name

* Single “Name” field by default
* Split only if operationally required

---

### Phone

* Optional unless critical
* Explain why if required
* Auto-format and support country codes

---

### Company / Organization

* Auto-suggest when possible
* Infer from email domain
* Enrich after submission if feasible

---

### Job Title / Role

* Dropdown if segmentation matters
* Optional by default

---

### Free-Text Fields

* Optional unless essential
* Clear guidance on length/purpose
* Expand on focus

---

### Selects & Checkboxes

* Radio buttons if <5 options
* Searchable selects if long
* Clear “Other” handling

---

## Layout & Flow

### Field Order

1. Easiest first (email, name)
2. Commitment-building fields
3. Sensitive or high-effort fields last

---

### Labels & Placeholders

* Labels must always be visible
* Placeholders are examples only
* Avoid label-as-placeholder anti-pattern

---

### Single vs Multi-Column

* Default to single column
* Multi-column only for closely related fields

---

## Multi-Step Forms

### Use When

* 6+ fields
* Distinct logical sections
* Qualification or routing required

### Best Practices

* Progress indicator
* Back navigation
* Save progress
* One topic per step

---

## Error Handling

### Inline Validation

* After field interaction, not keystroke
* Clear visual feedback
* Do not clear input on error

---

### Error Messaging

* Specific
* Human
* Actionable

Bad: “Invalid input”
Good: “Please enter a valid email ([name@company.com](mailto:name@company.com))”

---

## Submit Button Optimization

### Copy

Avoid: Submit, Send
Prefer: Action + Outcome

Examples:

* “Get My Quote”
* “Request Demo”
* “Download the Guide”

---

### States

* Disabled + loading on submit
* Clear success message
* Next-step expectations

---

## Trust & Friction Reduction

* Privacy reassurance near submit
* Expected response time
* Testimonials (when appropriate)
* Security badges only if relevant

---

## Mobile Optimization (Mandatory)

* ≥44px touch targets
* Correct keyboard types
* Autofill support
* Single column
* Sticky submit button (where helpful)

---

## Measurement (Required)

### Key Metrics

* Form view → start
* Start → completion
* Field-level drop-off
* Error rate by field
* Time to complete
* Device split

### Track:

* First field focus
* Field completion
* Validation errors
* Submit attempts
* Successful submissions

---

## Output Format

### Form Health Summary

* Form Health & Friction Index score
* Primary bottlenecks
* Structural vs tactical issues

---

### Form Audit

For each issue:

* **Issue**
* **Impact**
* **Fix**
* **Priority**

---

### Recommended Form Design

* Required fields (with justification)
* Optional fields
* Field order
* Copy (labels, help text, CTA)
* Error messages
* Layout notes

---

### Test Hypotheses

Clearly stated A/B test ideas with expected outcome

---

## Experiment Boundaries

Do **not** test:

* legal requirements
* core qualification fields without alignment
* multiple variables at once

---

## Questions to Ask (If Needed)

1. What is the current completion rate?
2. Which fields are actually used?
3. Do you have field-level analytics?
4. What happens after submission?
5. Are there compliance constraints?
6. Mobile vs desktop traffic split?

---

## Related Skills

* **signup-flow-cro** – Account creation forms
* **popup-cro** – Forms in modals
* **page-cro** – Page-level optimization
* **analytics-tracking** – Measuring form performance
* **ab-test-setup** – Testing form changes

---

## When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

## 🔗 Связи

- [[MOC - Skills]] — Skills library
- [[skills/skills-antigravity]] — Category: skills-antigravity

Attribution

ibragimov-oasisibragimov-oasis
View sourceMore from ibragimov-oasis →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Springboot Security

Java Spring Boot 服务中关于身份验证/授权、验证、CSRF、密钥、标头、速率限制和依赖安全的 Spring Security 最佳实践。

2456590 votes

Security Review

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

2456590 votes

Summarize Status

Write a short, colloquial summary for a Paperclip summary slot: open with the 1–3 specific, concrete actions the reader needs to take right now to unblock the work, then a brief plain-language status, streaming progress as it works.

798220 votes

Paperclip Task Bridge

Create, comment on, update, and list Paperclip tasks from Hermes using scoped Paperclip API credentials.

798220 votes

V3 Security Overhaul

Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.

701370 votes
View all in security →