End-to-end genome annotation pipeline from assembled contigs to functional annotation, covering repeat masking, gene prediction, and functional assignment for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Use when annotating a newly assembled genome from scratch.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add huang-sh/DeepScience --skill bio-workflows-genome-annotation-pipeline --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bio Workflows Genome Annotation Pipeline?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/huang-sh-bio-workflows-genome-annotation-pipeline)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bio-workflows-genome-annotation-pipeline
description: End-to-end genome annotation pipeline from assembled contigs to functional annotation, covering repeat masking, gene prediction, and functional assignment for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Use when annotating a newly assembled genome from scratch.
tool_type: mixed
primary_tool: Bakta
goal_approach_exempt: true
workflow: true
depends_on:
- genome-annotation/prokaryotic-annotation
- genome-annotation/eukaryotic-gene-prediction
- genome-annotation/repeat-annotation
- genome-annotation/functional-annotation
- genome-annotation/ncrna-annotation
- genome-annotation/annotation-qc
- genome-assembly/assembly-qc
qc_checkpoints:
- after_repeat_masking: "Repeat content within expected range for taxon"
- after_gene_prediction: "Gene count plausible, BUSCO completeness >90%"
- after_functional_annotation: ">60% of genes with functional assignment"
---
## Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: BRAKER3 3.0+, BUSCO 5.5+, Bakta 1.9+, Infernal 1.1+, InterProScan 5.66+, Prokka 1.14+, RepeatMasker 4.1+, RepeatModeler 2.0+, eggNOG-mapper 2.1+, pandas 2.2+, tRNAscan-SE 2.0+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- Python: `pip show <package>` then `help(module.function)` to check signatures
- CLI: `<tool> --version` then `<tool> --help` to confirm flags
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed
package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
# Genome Annotation Pipeline
**"Annotate my genome assembly"** -> Orchestrate prokaryotic (Bakta) or eukaryotic (BRAKER3) gene prediction, repeat masking (RepeatMasker), functional annotation (eggNOG-mapper, InterProScan), and ncRNA annotation (Infernal).
Complete workflow from assembled contigs to functional annotation for prokaryotic or eukaryotic genomes.
## Pipeline Overview
```
Assembled contigs
|
v
[0. Assembly QC] ----------> QUAST, BUSCO (confirm assembly quality)
|
+----- Prokaryotic? -----> Path A: Bakta (one-step annotation)
| |
| v
| Annotated genome (GFF3, GenBank, FASTA)
|
+----- Eukaryotic? ------> Path B: Multi-step pipeline
|
v
[1. Repeat Masking] ----> RepeatModeler + RepeatMasker
|
v
[2. Gene Prediction] ---> BRAKER3 (RNA-seq + protein evidence)
|
v
[3. Functional Annotation] -> eggNOG-mapper + InterProScan
|
v
[4. ncRNA Annotation] ---> Infernal + tRNAscan-SE
|
v
Annotated genome (GFF3, proteins, functional tables)
```
## Path A: Prokaryotic Annotation (Bakta)
Bakta provides comprehensive one-step annotation for bacteria and archaea. Preferred over Prokka for new projects.
### Database Setup
```bash
bakta_db download --output /path/to/bakta_db --type full
```
### Run Bakta
```bash
bakta \
--db /path/to/bakta_db \
--output bakta_out \
--prefix my_genome \
--locus-tag MYORG \
--genus Escherichia --species "coli" \
--strain K12 \
--gram - \
--complete \
--threads 8 \
assembly.fasta
```
### Prokaryotic QC Checkpoint
```python
import subprocess
import json
def validate_prokaryotic_annotation(bakta_dir, prefix, expected_cds_range=(500, 8000)):
'''
QC gates for prokaryotic annotation.
- CDS count in expected range for genome size
- tRNA count >= 20 (typical minimum for free-living bacteria)
- rRNA operons detected
'''
gff_file = f'{bakta_dir}/{prefix}.gff3'
feature_counts = {'CDS': 0, 'tRNA': 0, 'rRNA': 0, 'tmRNA': 0, 'ncRNA': 0}
with open(gff_file) as f:
for line in f:
if line.startswith('#'):
continue
fields = line.strip().split('\t')
if len(fields) >= 3 and fields[2] in feature_counts:
feature_counts[fields[2]] += 1
qc_pass = True
if not (expected_cds_range[0] <= feature_counts['CDS'] <= expected_cds_range[1]):
print(f'WARNING: CDS count {feature_counts["CDS"]} outside expected range {expected_cds_range}')
qc_pass = False
if feature_counts['tRNA'] < 20:
print(f'WARNING: Only {feature_counts["tRNA"]} tRNAs detected (expect >= 20)')
qc_pass = False
print(f'Feature summary: {feature_counts}')
return qc_pass, feature_counts
```
## Path B: Eukaryotic Annotation
### Step 1: Repeat Masking
```bash
# Build species-specific repeat library
RepeatModeler -database mygenome -threads 8 -LTRStruct
# Combine with known repeats
cat mygenome-families.fa /path/to/RepeatMasker/Libraries/RepeatMaskerLib.h5 > combined_lib.fa
# Mask the genome
RepeatMasker \
-lib combined_lib.fa \
-pa 8 \
-xsmall \
-gff \
-dir repeat_out \
assembly.fasta
```
#### Repeat Masking QC Checkpoint
```python
def check_repeat_content(repeatmasker_tbl, taxon='vertebrate'):
'''
Verify repeat content is within expected range for taxon.
Typical ranges:
- Vertebrate: 30-60%
- Insect: 15-45%
- Plant: 20-85%
- Fungus: 3-20%
'''
expected_ranges = {
'vertebrate': (30, 60), 'insect': (15, 45),
'plant': (20, 85), 'fungus': (3, 20)
}
low, high = expected_ranges.get(taxon, (5, 80))
with open(repeatmasker_tbl) as f:
for line in f:
if 'total interspersed' in line.lower():
pct = float(line.strip().split()[-1].replace('%', ''))
break
qc_pass = low <= pct <= high
if not qc_pass:
print(f'WARNING: Repeat content {pct:.1f}% outside expected range ({low}-{high}%) for {taxon}')
return qc_pass, pct
```
### Step 2: Gene Prediction with BRAKER3
```bash
# BRAKER3 combines GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS, and TSEBRA
# Uses both RNA-seq and protein evidence for best results
braker.pl \
--genome=assembly.fasta.masked \
--bam=rnaseq_sorted.bam \
--prot_seq=proteins.fa \
--softmasking \
--threads 8 \
--species=my_species \
--gff3 \
--workingdir=braker_out
# If only RNA-seq evidence available
braker.pl \
--genome=assembly.fasta.masked \
--bam=rnaseq_sorted.bam \
--softmasking \
--threads 8 \
--species=my_species \
--gff3
# If only protein evidence available (use OrthoDB proteins)
braker.pl \
--genome=assembly.fasta.masked \
--prot_seq=orthodb_proteins.fa \
--softmasking \
--threads 8 \
--species=my_species \
--gff3
```
#### Gene Prediction QC Checkpoint
```bash
# BUSCO completeness on predicted proteins. Use the DEEPEST applicable clade dataset
# (e.g. insecta_odb10 / embryophyta_odb10), NOT the shallow eukaryota_odb10.
# The diagnostic that matters: compare this proteome BUSCO to a genome-mode BUSCO on the
# same assembly -- a large gap means the predictor missed present genes (see genome-annotation/annotation-qc).
busco \
-i braker_out/braker.aa \
-l <clade>_odb10 \
-o busco_annotation \
-m proteins \
--cpu 8
```
```python
def check_gene_prediction(braker_gff, busco_summary, expected_genes_range=(15000, 35000)):
'''
QC gates after gene prediction.
- Gene count within expected range for genome
- BUSCO completeness > 90%
- Mean exons per gene > 1 (spliced genes expected in eukaryotes)
'''
gene_count = 0
exon_count = 0
with open(braker_gff) as f:
for line in f:
if line.startswith('#'):
continue
feature = line.strip().split('\t')[2] if len(line.strip().split('\t')) >= 3 else ''
if feature == 'gene':
gene_count += 1
elif feature == 'exon':
exon_count += 1
mean_exons = exon_count / gene_count if gene_count > 0 else 0
with open(busco_summary) as f:
for line in f:
if line.strip().startswith('C:'):
completeness = float(line.strip().split('C:')[1].split('%')[0])
break
issues = []
if not (expected_genes_range[0] <= gene_count <= expected_genes_range[1]):
issues.append(f'Gene count {gene_count} outside expected range {expected_genes_range}')
if completeness < 90:
issues.append(f'BUSCO completeness {completeness:.1f}% < 90%')
if mean_exons < 2:
issues.append(f'Mean exons/gene {mean_exons:.1f} is low for eukaryote')
print(f'Genes: {gene_count}, Mean exons/gene: {mean_exons:.1f}, BUSCO: {completeness:.1f}%')
return len(issues) == 0, issues
```
### Step 3: Functional Annotation
```bash
# eggNOG-mapper for comprehensive functional annotation
emapper.py \
-i braker_out/braker.aa \
--output eggnog_results \
--cpu 8 \
-m diamond \
--tax_scope auto \
--go_evidence non-electronic \
--target_orthologs all \
--seed_ortholog_evalue 1e-5 \
--override
# InterProScan for domain annotation (complementary to eggNOG)
interproscan.sh \
-i braker_out/braker.aa \
-o interpro_results.tsv \
-f tsv,gff3 \
-goterms \
-pa \
-cpu 8
```
#### Functional Annotation QC Checkpoint
```python
import pandas as pd
def check_functional_annotation(eggnog_annotations, total_genes):
'''
QC gate: > 60% of genes should have functional assignment.
Below 50% suggests database issues or highly divergent organism.
'''
cols = ['query', 'seed_ortholog', 'evalue', 'score', 'eggNOG_OGs', 'max_annot_lvl',
'COG_category', 'Description', 'Preferred_name', 'GOs', 'EC', 'KEGG_ko']
df = pd.read_csv(eggnog_annotations, sep='\t', comment='#', header=None)
df.columns = (cols + [f'c{i}' for i in range(len(df.columns) - len(cols))])[:len(df.columns)]
annotated = len(df[df['Description'] != '-'])
pct_annotated = annotated / total_genes * 100
has_go = len(df[df['GOs'] != '-'])
has_kegg = len(df[df['KEGG_ko'] != '-'])
print(f'Annotated: {annotated}/{total_genes} ({pct_annotated:.1f}%)')
print(f'With GO terms: {has_go}, With KEGG: {has_kegg}')
if pct_annotated < 60:
print('WARNING: <60% annotated. Check database version or use broader taxonomy scope.')
return pct_annotated >= 60
```
### Step 4: ncRNA Annotation
```bash
# tRNAscan-SE for tRNA genes
tRNAscan-SE \
-E \
--thread 8 \
-o trna_results.txt \
--gff trna.gff \
assembly.fasta
# Infernal for Rfam-based ncRNA annotation. Rfam.cm ships pre-calibrated: cmpress it, never recalibrate.
# --cut_ga uses the curated per-family bit-score gathering thresholds (the correct Rfam default over a
# flat E-value); --rfam is the large-DB strict filter; --nohmmonly keeps GA valid for every model.
cmpress Rfam.cm
cmscan \
--cpu 8 \
--cut_ga --rfam --nohmmonly \
--tblout rfam_results.tbl \
--fmt 2 \
--clanin Rfam.clanin \
Rfam.cm \
assembly.fasta
# Clan deoverlapping: drop hits marked '=' (dominated by a higher-scoring clanmate)
grep -v ' = ' rfam_results.tbl > rfam_results.deoverlapped.tbl
```
## Merging Annotations
```python
def merge_annotations(braker_gff, trna_gff, rfam_tbl, eggnog_tsv, output_gff):
'''Merge gene predictions, ncRNAs, and functional annotations into final GFF3.'''
import subprocess
# Use AGAT for GFF merging and validation
subprocess.run([
'agat_sp_merge_annotations.pl',
'--gff', braker_gff,
'--gff', trna_gff,
'-o', output_gff
], check=True)
# Validate final GFF3
subprocess.run([
'agat_sp_statistics.pl',
'--gff', output_gff,
'-o', output_gff.replace('.gff3', '_stats.txt')
], check=True)
print(f'Merged annotations written to {output_gff}')
```
## Troubleshooting
| Issue | Likely Cause | Solution |
|-------|--------------|----------|
| Low gene count | Repeat masking too aggressive | Use `-xsmall` (soft-masking) not `-x` (hard-masking) |
| BUSCO < 80% | Poor assembly or missing evidence | Add RNA-seq data; check assembly contiguity |
| Many partial genes | Fragmented assembly | Scaffold first; use `--min_contig` in BRAKER |
| < 60% annotated | Divergent organism | Use broader `--tax_scope`; try InterProScan |
| Too many genes | Gene prediction artifacts | Increase `--min_intron_len`; filter short ORFs |
| Missing ncRNAs | Wrong Rfam models | Verify Rfam version matches genome build |
## Complete Pipeline Script
```bash
#!/bin/bash
set -e
GENOME="assembly.fasta"
RNASEQ_BAM="rnaseq_sorted.bam"
PROTEINS="orthodb_proteins.fa"
BAKTA_DB="/path/to/bakta_db"
THREADS=8
# Determine organism type
ORGANISM_TYPE="${1:-eukaryotic}" # prokaryotic or eukaryotic
if [ "$ORGANISM_TYPE" == "prokaryotic" ]; then
echo "Running prokaryotic annotation with Bakta"
bakta --db $BAKTA_DB --output bakta_out --prefix genome \
--locus-tag MYORG --threads $THREADS $GENOME
echo "Done. Results in bakta_out/"
else
echo "Running eukaryotic annotation pipeline"
echo "Step 1: Repeat masking"
RepeatModeler -database mygenome -threads $THREADS -LTRStruct
RepeatMasker -lib mygenome-families.fa -pa $THREADS -xsmall -gff -dir repeat_out $GENOME
echo "Step 2: Gene prediction with BRAKER3"
braker.pl --genome=repeat_out/$(basename $GENOME).masked \
--bam=$RNASEQ_BAM --prot_seq=$PROTEINS \
--softmasking --threads $THREADS --gff3 --workingdir=braker_out
echo "Step 3: BUSCO QC (use the deepest applicable clade dataset, not eukaryota_odb10)"
busco -i braker_out/braker.aa -l ${LINEAGE:-eukaryota_odb10} -o busco_check -m proteins --cpu $THREADS
echo "Step 4: Functional annotation"
emapper.py -i braker_out/braker.aa --output eggnog_out --cpu $THREADS -m diamond
echo "Step 5: ncRNA annotation"
tRNAscan-SE -E --thread $THREADS -o trna_out.txt --gff trna.gff $GENOME
cmscan --cpu $THREADS --cut_ga --rfam --nohmmonly --tblout rfam.tbl --fmt 2 --clanin Rfam.clanin Rfam.cm $GENOME
echo "Done. Check braker_out/, eggnog_out*, trna.gff, rfam.tbl"
fi
```
## Related Skills
- genome-annotation/prokaryotic-annotation - Bakta and Prokka details
- genome-annotation/eukaryotic-gene-prediction - BRAKER3 and AUGUSTUS options
- genome-annotation/repeat-annotation - Soft-masking before gene prediction
- genome-annotation/functional-annotation - eggNOG-mapper and InterProScan
- genome-annotation/ncrna-annotation - Infernal/Rfam and tRNAscan-SE detail
- rna-structure/ncrna-search - Covariance-model search, gathering thresholds, and clan resolution
- genome-annotation/annotation-qc - BUSCO genome-vs-proteome, OMArk, CheckM2 gates
- genome-assembly/assembly-qc - Pre-annotation assembly quality checks
- genome-intervals/gtf-gff-handling - GFF3/GTF hierarchy traversal, AGAT sanitizing/validation, coordinate conversion, and seqid-consistency checks on the merged annotation
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!