Select frameworks for LLM multi-agent systems.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill llm-multi-agent-systems-software-engineering --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Llm Multi Agent Systems Software Engineering?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-llm-multi-agent-systems-software-engineering-ai-collection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: llm-multi-agent-systems-software-engineering
description: "Select frameworks for LLM multi-agent systems."
metadata:
arxiv_id: "2608.11965"
published: "2026-08-12"
authors: "Mariama Celi Serafim De Oliveira, Motunrayo Osatohanmen Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso, Claudio Di Sipio, Davide Di Ruscio, Phuong T. Nguyen"
conference: "Empirical Software Engineering journal"
tags: [systems-engineering, multi-agent-systems, llm, software-engineering, framework-selection]
license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
---
# LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering
This skill implements the methodology from arXiv:2608.11965 for selecting, evaluating, and implementing LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) in software engineering contexts.
## Core Methodology
The paper provides a comprehensive mixed-method approach combining quantitative analysis of MAS frameworks with qualitative empirical evaluation through a common use case (requirements file summarization). The methodology helps developers navigate the complex landscape of available MAS tools and frameworks.
## Framework Evaluation Criteria
### Quantitative Analysis Dimensions
1. **Documentation Quality**: Completeness, clarity, and examples
2. **Feature Coverage**: Support for fundamental MAS components (agent roles, communication protocols, coordination mechanisms)
3. **Developer Experience**: Ease of setup, configuration, and integration
4. **Advanced Capabilities**: Telemetry, monitoring, debugging support
### Qualitative Evaluation Approach
1. **Common Use Case Implementation**: Implement the same task across multiple frameworks
2. **Performance Metrics**: ROUGE scores for text generation tasks, response time, resource usage
3. **Maintainability Assessment**: Code complexity, extensibility, error handling
4. **Scalability Testing**: Performance under varying agent counts and task complexity
## Key Findings
### Framework Capabilities
- Most frameworks provide good coverage of fundamental MAS components
- Advanced features like agent telemetry are still missing in many frameworks
- No significant performance differences in basic tasks (e.g., ROUGE scores for summarization)
### Implementation Challenges
1. **Technology Selection**: Choosing appropriate LLM providers and agent frameworks
2. **Coordination Rules**: Designing effective communication and collaboration protocols
3. **Role Design**: Defining specific, non-overlapping agent responsibilities
4. **Error Handling**: Managing failures and inconsistencies in multi-agent workflows
## Practical Guidelines
### Framework Selection Process
1. **Define Requirements**: Identify specific needs (coordination complexity, scalability, monitoring)
2. **Shortlist Candidates**: Based on documentation quality and feature coverage
3. **Prototype Implementation**: Test with a representative use case
4. **Evaluate Trade-offs**: Balance between features, performance, and maintainability
### Implementation Best Practices
1. **Modular Architecture**: Separate agent logic from coordination logic
2. **Standardized Communication**: Use consistent message formats and protocols
3. **Comprehensive Logging**: Track agent interactions and decision processes
4. **Graceful Degradation**: Handle agent failures without system collapse
### Common Pitfalls and Mitigations
#### Over-Engineering
**Problem**: Creating overly complex agent architectures for simple tasks
**Mitigation**: Start with minimal viable agent systems and incrementally add complexity
#### Poor Coordination
**Problem**: Agents working at cross-purposes or duplicating effort
**Mitigation**: Implement clear role definitions and coordination protocols
#### Inadequate Monitoring
**Problem**: Difficulty debugging and understanding agent behavior
**Mitigation**: Implement comprehensive logging and visualization tools
#### Vendor Lock-in
**Problem**: Tight coupling to specific LLM providers or frameworks
**Mitigation**: Use abstraction layers and standardized interfaces
## Activation Keywords
- LLM multi-agent systems
- MAS framework selection
- software engineering agents
- multi-agent coordination
- LLM-based software development
- agent orchestration patterns
## References
- Original paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11965
- Empirical Software Engineering journal
- Requirements file summarization use caseIs this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!