FedDOSE framework for federated learning that explicitly decomposes site effects for modeling brain dynamic functional connectivity. Introduces Modularity-Guided Tucker Decomposition to encode high-dimensional dFC tensors and capture modular-level spatio-temporal patterns. Uses class-specific prototypes with Optimal Transport barycenter formulation and Procrustes analysis for global alignment across sites.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill feddose-federated-learning-dynamic-functional-connectivity --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Feddose Federated Learning Dynamic Functional Connectivity?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-feddose-federated-learning-dynamic-functional-conn)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: feddose-federated-learning-dynamic-functional-connectivity
description: "FedDOSE framework for federated learning that explicitly decomposes site effects for modeling brain dynamic functional connectivity. Introduces Modularity-Guided Tucker Decomposition to encode high-dimensional dFC tensors and capture modular-level spatio-temporal patterns. Uses class-specific prototypes with Optimal Transport barycenter formulation and Procrustes analysis for global alignment across sites."
metadata:
arxiv_id: "2608.07393"
published: "2026-08-11"
authors: "Deepank Girish, Yi Hao Chan, Yubin Zheng, Sukrit Gupta, Jagath C. Rajapakse"
tags: [federated-learning, dynamic-functional-connectivity, multi-site-fmri, autism-spectrum-disorder, adhd, optimal-transport, tucker-decomposition, modularity-guided, procrustes-analysis]
license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
---
# FedDOSE: Federated Learning Framework Decomposing Site Effects for Modeling Brain Dynamic Functional Connectivity
## Overview
FedDOSE is a novel federated learning framework that explicitly decomposes site effects for analysis of dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) in multi-site fMRI datasets. While standard federated learning approaches struggle with statistical heterogeneity and site differences in multi-site data settings, FedDOSE addresses these challenges by introducing a Modularity-Guided Tucker Decomposition block to encode high-dimensional dFC tensors and capture modular-level spatio-temporal patterns efficiently.
The framework generates class-specific prototypes across all sites and aligns them at the global level using a combination of Optimal Transport (OT) barycenter formulation and Procrustes analysis. Extensive experiments for diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) on three multi-site resting-state fMRI datasets (ABIDE-I, ABIDE-II, and ADHD-200) demonstrate that FedDOSE outperforms state-of-the-art methods in ASD and ADHD detection.
## When to Use
Use FedDOSE when:
- Working with multi-site fMRI datasets requiring privacy-preserving collaborative training
- Analyzing dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) instead of static FC
- Needing to handle statistical heterogeneity and site differences in federated learning
- Diagnosing neurodevelopmental disorders like ASD and ADHD
- Requiring modular-level spatio-temporal pattern analysis
- Working with high-dimensional dFC tensors that need efficient encoding
## Core Methodology
### 1. Modularity-Guided Tucker Decomposition
- Encodes high-dimensional dFC tensors efficiently
- Captures modular-level spatio-temporal patterns
- Reduces dimensionality while preserving relevant information
- Incorporates brain network modularity as prior knowledge
### 2. Class-Specific Prototype Generation
- Generates prototypes for each diagnostic class (healthy, ASD, ADHD)
- Prototypes are created across all participating sites
- Enables consistent representation learning despite site differences
- Provides interpretable class representations
### 3. Global Alignment Strategy
- **Optimal Transport (OT) Barycenter Formulation**: Aligns prototypes across sites using optimal transport theory
- **Procrustes Analysis**: Further refines alignment through geometric transformation
- Combines both methods for robust cross-site consistency
- Preserves local site-specific characteristics while ensuring global coherence
### 4. Federated Learning Architecture
- Privacy-preserving paradigm for collaborative training
- Explicit decomposition of site effects
- Handles statistical heterogeneity across sites
- Maintains data locality while enabling model sharing
## Implementation Guidelines
### Data Preparation
1. **dFC Tensor Construction**: Compute dynamic functional connectivity matrices over sliding time windows
2. **Site Metadata**: Collect site-specific metadata for heterogeneity analysis
3. **Quality Control**: Apply consistent preprocessing across all sites
4. **Dataset Partitioning**: Ensure appropriate train/validation/test splits per site
### Model Architecture
1. **Tucker Decomposition Block**: Implement modularity-guided Tucker decomposition with appropriate ranks
2. **Prototype Layer**: Design prototype generation layer with appropriate number of prototypes per class
3. **Alignment Module**: Implement OT barycenter and Procrustes analysis components
4. **Federated Communication**: Set up secure communication protocol between sites
### Training Protocol
1. **Local Training**: Train models locally at each site with site-specific data
2. **Prototype Exchange**: Share only prototype representations, not raw data
3. **Global Alignment**: Perform OT and Procrustes alignment at central server
4. **Model Aggregation**: Aggregate aligned models using federated averaging or similar techniques
## Expected Results
- Superior performance in ASD and ADHD detection compared to state-of-the-art methods
- Robust learning from multi-site datasets with statistical heterogeneity
- Effective handling of site differences through explicit decomposition
- Preservation of privacy through federated learning paradigm
- Efficient encoding of high-dimensional dFC tensors through Tucker decomposition
## Pitfalls and Considerations
- **Computational Complexity**: Tucker decomposition and OT alignment can be computationally intensive
- **Site Heterogeneity**: Extreme site differences may still pose challenges despite decomposition
- **Prototype Quality**: Performance depends on quality and representativeness of prototypes
- **Communication Overhead**: Federated learning requires multiple communication rounds
- **Hyperparameter Tuning**: Multiple hyperparameters for decomposition ranks, OT parameters, etc.
- **Data Imbalance**: Site-specific data imbalances may affect prototype quality
## Activation Keywords
- FedDOSE federated learning
- Dynamic functional connectivity dFC
- Multi-site fMRI privacy
- Modularity-Guided Tucker Decomposition
- Optimal Transport barycenter fMRI
- Procrustes analysis federated
- ASD ADHD diagnosis multi-site
- Site effects decomposition
- Class-specific prototypes fMRI
- Brain network modularity federated
## References
- Original Paper: arXiv:2608.07393 [cs.LG]
- Related Skills:
- `federated-brain-trajectory-gnn`
- `dynamic-path-brain-connectivity`
- `time-varying-brain-connectivity`
- `functional-connectivity-graph-neural-networks`
- `specificity-aware-federated-graph-learning`Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!