**arXiv ID:** 2608.19888 **Authors:** Kentaro Oda **Published:** 2026-08-20T10:54:17Z **Abstract:** Streaming systems that maintain a pool of expert models must repeatedly decide whether to reuse an existing expert for arriving data, spawn a new one, or defer. We present a decision layer that makes all three outcomes statistically meaningful. Reuse and spawn are posed as one-sided sequential hypotheses on a conditional (mechanism-level) discrepancy, separated by an indifference zone; defer is...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill evidence-before-expansion-reuse-spawn-or-defer-in-lifelong-expert-pools --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evidence Before Expansion Reuse Spawn Or Defer In Lifelong Expert Pools?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-evidence-before-expansion-reuse-spawn-or-defer-in)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# Evidence Before Expansion: Reuse, Spawn, or Defer in Lifelong Expert Pools
**arXiv ID:** 2608.19888
**Authors:** Kentaro Oda
**Published:** 2026-08-20T10:54:17Z
**Abstract:**
Streaming systems that maintain a pool of expert models must repeatedly decide whether to reuse an existing expert for arriving data, spawn a new one, or defer. We present a decision layer that makes all three outcomes statistically meaningful. Reuse and spawn are posed as one-sided sequential hypotheses on a conditional (mechanism-level) discrepancy, separated by an indifference zone; defer is exactly the state in which neither betting e-process has accumulated sufficient evidence. We prove finite-time anytime validity for the observable surrogate discrepancy of a predictable discriminator sequence, and an unconditional one-sided transfer to the population quantity in which each side's slack is the excess risk of a single discriminator; an empirically observed downward-bias regularity makes the spawn side exactly conservative. Recency without sacrificing the guarantee is obtained by a restarted e-detector: a bank of unwindowed betting supermartingales at geometrically spaced restart times (O(log t) memory), with the error budget spent over restart instances, which preserves lifetime anytime validity; spending over expert-creation order likewise controls multiplicity for unboundedly many experts. On synthetic multi-concept streams, Electricity, Covertype, and the recurrence-heavy INSECTS benchmark, the instance-accounted restarted bank achieves zero false spawns and zero false reuses after switches and matches or exceeds the retired windowed heuristic (INSECTS-reoccurring accuracy 0.675), making the deployed algorithm and the guaranteed algorithm one and the same.
## Skill Description
This skill is generated from the arXiv paper: Evidence Before Expansion: Reuse, Spawn, or Defer in Lifelong Expert Pools (2608.19888).
## How to Use
[To be filled in by the user or by future automation]
## References
- [arXiv:2608.19888](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19888v1)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!