Resilience Audit

---
name: resilience-audit
description: >-
  Failure-mode audit (FMEA for software) — for each way the system can fail (network, storage, partial completion, crash, concurrency, bad input), check whether code DETECTS, HANDLES, RECOVERS, and COMMUNICATES it. Triggers on: "/resilience-audit", "resilience-audit", "FMEA audit". Use when touching network, storage, async, retry, or rollback paths. Flags data loss, silent-success-on-failure, missing rollback/retry/idempotency. Reports; does not fix unless asked.
---

# Resilience Audit

**Language:** Generate EVERYTHING at runtime in the user's language — questions, answer options, menu labels, recommendations, report narrative. Detect from their messages; never default to English just because this file is English. English is allowed only for technical terms: commands, paths, code identifiers, severity labels (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), and tier names (Light/Standard/Heavy).

For every operation: **"what happens when this FAILS?"** Report; do NOT fix unless asked.

## Failure categories
1. **External I/O** — network down/slow, API 4xx/5xx/timeout, rate-limit. Retry w/ backoff? Timeout set? Clear error vs hang?
2. **Storage** — disk full, permission denied, partial write. Atomic write (temp+rename)? Cleanup on failure? Existing good copy untouched?
3. **Partial completion** — half-done op (50/100 files). Reported as FAILURE, never success.
4. **Crash / OOM** — killed mid-op. Idempotent restart? No orphaned half-state?
5. **Concurrency** — two instances, race, deadlock. Locking / idempotency / safe re-entry?
6. **Input / data** — malformed, null, truncated, huge. Validate at boundary? Fail-fast?
7. **Dependency down** — fallback/cache/graceful degrade? Clear error vs silent hang?
8. **Resource exhaustion** — bounded? Backpressure? Cleanup on error path?

Per-stack timeout/atomicity/idempotency patterns to grep: read `references/checks.md` before scanning.

## For each failure point, check 4 things
- **Detected?** code notices it (doesn't swallow)?
- **Handled?** retry/fallback/fail-clean — not ignored, not silent-success?
- **Recoverable?** rollback/idempotent; no data loss or corruption?
- **Communicated?** clear error to user+log; not a hang, not a false "done"?

## Discipline
- Trace actual failure path (cite file:line). Don't assume handling exists; prove it.
- "partial = failure" — any path reporting success on partial completion = CRITICAL.
- "logged" ≠ "handled" — swallowed+logged error that corrupts state or returns success = CRITICAL.

## Fix mode (choice-gated)
After the report, present via `ask_question`:
- **Fix safe ones** — add missing timeout, null/input validation, clear error+log on unhandled path. Each: checkpoint → fix → build+tests → revert if newly red.
- **Let me pick** — user-selected fixes only.
- **Report only** — change nothing.

NEVER auto-fix: retry/rollback/recovery/atomicity logic (semantic changes can introduce new failure modes).

## Grants & denials (CLASSIFY-BLOCK)
| class | step it powers | grant | on denial |
|---|---|---|---|
| read | trace failure paths for the 8 categories above | `Read`·`Grep`·`Glob` | refuse that file, name it — never a clean bill |
| write | Fix mode's safe-guard apply, incl. checkpoint → build+tests → revert if newly red | `Edit`·`Bash` (checkpoint/build/revert need exec) | report the fix as NOT applied AND the checkpoint/revert as NOT available, never claim done |

A denial reaches the WORKER as a visible message and propagates no further — never to a
caller, never as a catchable condition. Every row above states a grant or an explicit death;
a step that dies says so in the output, never as a false "done"/"skipped"/"clean".

- **read** denied → refuse before scanning; never a false clean bill.
- **write** denied → report the change as NOT applied — never claim done.
- **network** denied/unfetchable → `⚠️ unverified: check [source]`.
- **spawn** denied → degrade per Escalation's own capability-lever fallback (never fake
  parallelism) and say the fan-out did not happen — already discharged there; a row above
  is only for a spawn this skill does OUTSIDE tier escalation.

## Output
`| operation | failure mode | effect | handling (file:line) | severity | recommended guard |`
Ordering/atomicity findings · Summary (counts + top fixes) · Not assessed

Severity: CRITICAL (data loss/corruption/silent-success) · HIGH (crash/hang/partial-no-recovery) · MEDIUM (poor degradation/missing retry) · LOW (cosmetic)

**Reporting:** call `ReportFindings` when callable — `file`/`line` MUST be the defect site, never the enclosing function; an unresolvable line reports your best guess, named imprecise in the wrap-up — **never dropped, never faked.** Severity prefixed in `summary` (e.g. `[HIGH] …`), ranked most-severe first, SUSPECTED as `verdict: PLAUSIBLE`; chat then carries only the wrap-up line (counts · coverage gaps · overflow past 32 · any imprecise-line findings) + the fix menu, never a restatement of findings. Not callable → the table above, unchanged. An Apply-fixes click = consent to the safe-fix class only — gated the same as this skill's own fix-mode (Hook Context needs an interactive session, per the Hook Context rule below) — composing with (never bypassing) the fix-mode discipline. **After any fix round, re-report the same findings with `outcome: fixed`/`skipped`/`no_change_needed` — skipping this leaves the round UNFINISHED.**

## Escalation — Scope & Model Quality

Tiers are **capability targets**, not platform commands — resolve each to your host's nearest lever. No lever for one? **Degrade gracefully — never fake parallelism you can't do**; escalate via model tier + reasoning depth instead.

| Level | Intent | Capability target | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Light** | Spot failure-mode check, key paths only | Cheapest model · single agent, no sub-agents. | Low |
| **Standard** | Balanced FMEA, multi-category coverage | Balanced model · raised reasoning · sub-agents per category **only if your platform runs concurrent workers** (else single-agent). | Balanced |
| **Heavy** | Full 8-category FMEA + adversarial verify | Most capable model + largest context · deepest reasoning · max sub-agent fan-out **if supported** · adversarial cross-check where available. | High |

Per-platform Heavy levers + Heavy-run durability: read `references/escalation.md` before a Heavy run. No concurrent fan-out on your host → escalate by model + reasoning only.

**Agent Context (interactive):** score the tier rubric, then call `ask_question` once with the 3 tiers — the pick marked `✓`, score shown, labels localized — and wait for the choice before starting. `ask_question` = your platform's question tool: Claude Code `AskUserQuestion` · Cline `ask_question` · Copilot `askQuestions` · Gemini CLI `ask_user` (business-tier product; individual tiers ended 2026-06-18 → Antigravity CLI) · Codex `request_user_input` · Cursor/Devin Desktop (ex-Windsurf)/Antigravity built-in prompts; none → numbered text menu.

**Tier rubric (deterministic):** +1 each — ① >20 files or whole-repo/cross-module reach ② >2 of this skill's categories relevant ③ release/security/pre-ship context ④ findings will drive code changes. **0–1 Light · 2–3 Standard · 4 Heavy.** **Freshness cap:** scope already audited ≥Standard this session → cap at Light (re-auditing fresh ground wastes tokens; scope to what changed). **Default tier:** honor `.coalmine.json` `defaultTier` unless the user requests a tier for that run — an explicit request overrides everything.

**Hook Context (auto-triggered):** auto-Light, no tier question, no sub-agents — report first. Interactive session (a user is present) → follow this skill's own Fix mode section, if it defines one, for what to offer after the report; non-interactive → report-only. Where a Fix mode section exists, never fix without a chosen option.

**Entanglement:** after the report, if confirmed findings fall in another canary's domain, offer it once via `ask_question` (one line, max one offer): perf/N+1 → scale-canary · contract/serialization/config → drift-canary · failure-path/retry → resilience-audit · logging/metrics → telemetry-canary · coupling/DI → testability-canary · dependency/CVE → supply-chain-audit · unverified version-sensitive claim → source-grounding · missing/stale rule → gold-standard.

**Self error-report:** if this skill misbehaves (contradictory instruction, broken procedure, wrong finding class), OFFER to file it at https://github.com/HetCreep/CoalMine/issues/new/choose with a user-reviewed summary — never auto-submit, never include unapproved code or paths.