Skip to content
Back to skills

Privacy Check

ASecurity

Use to assess Privacy by Design compliance and GDPR/data protection alignment for a feature or system.

  • 46 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 28, 2026
developmentgoreactgitsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 7, 2026

npx -y skills add haabe/mycelium --skill privacy-check --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Privacy Check?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Privacy Check
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/haabe-privacy-check/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/haabe-privacy-check)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: privacy-check
description: "Use to assess Privacy by Design compliance and GDPR/data protection alignment for a feature or system."
metadata:
  instruction_budget: "37"
  framework_dependency: "mycelium"
  framework_dependency_note: "This skill is designed to run within the Mycelium framework (https://github.com/haabe/mycelium). Standalone use will skip the canvas state, theory gates, and harness behavior the skill assumes. Install: /plugin install mycelium@haabe-mycelium."
---

# Privacy Check Skill

Privacy by Design assessment.

## Workflow

### 7 Foundational Principles (Cavoukian)

1. **Proactive not Reactive**: Are privacy measures built in from the start?
   - [ ] Privacy considered in design phase, not bolted on
   - [ ] Risks identified before implementation

2. **Privacy as Default**: Is the most private option the default?
   - [ ] Data collection opt-in, not opt-out
   - [ ] Minimum data collected by default
   - [ ] Sharing disabled by default

3. **Privacy Embedded in Design**: Is privacy integral to the system?
   - [ ] Privacy controls are core features, not add-ons
   - [ ] Architecture supports data minimization

4. **Positive-Sum, not Zero-Sum** (originally "Full Functionality"): Privacy without trade-offs?
   - [ ] Privacy features don't degrade user experience
   - [ ] Not a false choice between privacy and functionality
   - [ ] Avoid false dichotomies: privacy vs. security, privacy vs. business value

5. **End-to-End Security**: Data protected throughout its lifecycle?
   - [ ] Stored and sent the way the data needs: encryption where personal data is stored or sent electronically; for paper or in-person handling, who holds it and where (v0.271.0)
   - [ ] Secure deletion when no longer needed
   - [ ] Access controls throughout the data lifecycle

6. **Visibility and Transparency**: Is data processing transparent?
   - [ ] Users know what data is collected and why
   - [ ] Processing purposes documented and communicated
   - [ ] Third-party sharing disclosed

7. **Respect for User Privacy**: Are user interests centered?
   - [ ] Users can access their data
   - [ ] Users can correct their data
   - [ ] Users can delete their data
   - [ ] Consent is informed, specific, and revocable

### Data Protection Assessment

**If the product holds no personal data, say so in the data inventory, with how you know** (a
page that stores nothing, a book): the principles above then need only a line each confirming
nothing is collected. Controls are proportional to what is held; none are defaults (v0.271.0).

- **What data is collected?** List all personal data fields.
- **Why?** Lawful basis for each data element.
- **How long?** Retention period for each data type.
- **Who accesses it?** List all parties with access.
- **Where is it stored?** Data residency and cross-border transfers.
- **How is it protected?** Encryption, access control, monitoring.
- **What if breached?** Incident response plan exists?

### Output

```
## Privacy Assessment: [Feature/System]

### PbD Principles
| Principle | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Proactive | Pass/Fail | ... |
| Default privacy | Pass/Fail | ... |
| Embedded | Pass/Fail | ... |
| Full functionality | Pass/Fail | ... |
| End-to-end security | Pass/Fail | ... |
| Transparency | Pass/Fail | ... |
| User respect | Pass/Fail | ... |

### Data Inventory
| Data | Purpose | Basis | Retention | Protection |
|------|---------|-------|-----------|-----------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Risks and Recommendations
1. [risk and recommended action]
```

## Canvas (MANDATORY — the source of truth, do this FIRST)

`.claude/canvas/privacy-assessment.yml` is the canonical record. The decision log is provenance; the
canvas is what the framework READS. Write the canvas before the decision log — if only one of the two
lands, it must be this one.

**WHY THIS SECTION EXISTS (v0.170.0).** On the dogfood project this file carried
`last_assessed: 2026-05-04` while **all seven** Privacy-by-Design principles read
`assessment: not-assessed` with empty `evidence`, and `data_inventory` was empty. **A date asserting
an assessment that never landed is worse than an empty file**: a reader checking freshness sees an
assessed record, and the `Privacy` theory gate — Required at L2-L4 — reads it. Never stamp
`last_assessed` in a run that does not also fill the principles.

**UPDATE each of the seven keys in `principles`** (`proactive_not_reactive`, `privacy_as_default`,
`privacy_embedded`, `full_functionality`, `end_to_end_security`, `visibility_transparency`,
`respect_for_users`):

```yaml
  <principle_key>:
    assessment: pass|partial|fail|not-assessed
    evidence: "<what was observed, and where>"
```

**Then:** `data_inventory` (what personal data the product actually touches — an empty list is a
CLAIM that it touches none, so make it deliberately), `processors` (every party outside the product
that receives or stores that data, with `role`, `data_types`, `location`, `retention_period` and
`agreement`: the answers to "Who accesses it?" and "Where is it stored?" above), `dpia_required` +
`dpia_rationale`, and `last_assessed`.

**A reassessment updates these same fields; it does not add a new block.** What changed, and why,
goes in the decision-log entry below. The schema rejects any root key it does not name, and from
v0.250.0 the write is checked as it lands.

**`last_assessed` IS A CLAIM ABOUT THE PRINCIPLES BELOW IT.** Set it only when they were filled in
the same run. If the assessment is partial, say which keys were judged in `dpia_rationale` rather
than dating the whole file.

## Postflight: Verify-After-Write (write-narration-verification discipline)

**Hard rule** (per the operating contract's Communication Rules, anti-pattern #7 Stage 2 graduation). Before any
user-facing summary claims the assessment was recorded, use the **Read tool** on the canvas file and
confirm the VALUE fields above actually changed — not just `_meta.last_validated`. A stamp moving
while the assessed fields stay at their defaults is the exact failure this skill shipped with: the
file reads fresh and holds nothing. Preflight protects what gets written; Postflight protects what
gets claimed about what was written.

## Decision Log (MANDATORY per G-P4)
**APPEND** a `### Privacy Assessment` entry to `.claude/harness/decision-log.md` with: principles assessed, data flows identified, risks found, GDPR compliance status.

## Theory Citations
- Cavoukian: Privacy by Design (7 principles)
- GDPR: Data protection regulation

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.