Get a quick answer to a legal question, like 'do I need an NDA with investors?' or 'does GDPR apply to me?'. You get a short memo with the answer, the reasoning, the sources, and what to do next. Sensitive or unusual questions get flagged for a real lawyer.
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add gethouston/houston --skill answer-a-legal-question --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Answer A Legal Question?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gethouston-answer-a-legal-question)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: answer-a-legal-question
description: "Get a quick answer to a legal question, like 'do I need an NDA with investors?' or 'does GDPR apply to me?'. You get a short memo with the answer, the reasoning, the sources, and what to do next. Sensitive or unusual questions get flagged for a real lawyer."
version: 1
category: Advisory
featured: yes
image: scroll
integrations: [stripe]
x_houston:
created_by: houston
skill_schema: 1
---
# Answer a Legal Question
## When to use
- "do I need an NDA with investors?" - typically no, pitch-stage investors refuse.
- "do I need a DPA with {vendor}?" - depends on data + region.
- "does GDPR apply to me?" - depends on EU visitors/customers + data.
- "can I use this customer logo on my landing page?" - depends on MSA marketing rights clause.
- "do I need to file an 83(b)?" - probably yes, within 30 days of stock issuance. Hard deadline.
- Any "do I need X?" or "does X apply?" fits short memo.
## Steps
<!-- houston-workflow:v1 -->
1. **Read shared context.** Load `legal-context.md` for entity, data geography of current users, standing agreements, founder risk posture, escalation rules. Also read relevant prior `advice-memos/` entries - don't re-answer decided stuff.
2. **Clarify question (at most one follow-up).** If question hinges on fact not in context, ask ONE targeted question with best-modality hint. Examples:
- "Does GDPR apply?" → "Do you have analytics on your landing page, and any EU visitors? If your analytics tool is connected, I can check in 30 seconds."
- "Do I need DPA with {vendor}?" → "What data {vendor} touch - customer PII, payment data, employee data, or own company docs?"
Don't ask more than one. Broad question → scope it ("narrow to {subquestion}").
3. **Research if needed.** For questions citing regulations, checklists, market standards, use `composio search web-search` (or similar - discover at runtime) to pull authoritative sources: primary statute/regulation text, EDPB / IRS / SEC / USPTO guidance, reputable founder-legal checklists (Capbase, Andrew Bosin, Promise Legal, YC, Common Paper). Cite every source inline. No "probably" hedges - state or mark UNKNOWN.
4. **Draft memo (~200-400 words, direct, verb-led).** Structure:
1. **Question** - founder's question in one sentence, verbatim if possible.
2. **Short answer** - one paragraph. First sentence = bottom line ("Yes", "No", "It depends - here's rule"). No hedging. If depends, state two or three forks + what decides between.
3. **Context** - one paragraph: why applies to this founder. Reference entity (Delaware C-corp), stage (week 0, pre-revenue / one customer), stack (Stripe, Google Workspace), any relevant standing agreement or data geography.
4. **Sources cited** - bulleted. Each with one-line why-it-matters. Primary statute > regulator guidance > reputable checklist. 2-5 sources, no Wikipedia.
5. **Next move** - one concrete action in plain language. Examples: "Draft a DPA with this vendor.", "Add this vendor to your privacy vendor list.", "File 83(b) within {N} days - I can track the deadline."
6. **Judgment-call disclaimer** - "This is a judgment call, not final legal advice. Escalate to outside counsel if {specific condition - e.g. data is health-related, customer is a regulated entity, deal over $100K}."
5. **Flag `attorneyReviewRequired: true`** if question touches:
- HIPAA, PCI-DSS, COPPA, biometrics, export controls.
- International data transfers with non-standard mechanism.
- Tax treatment decisions (QSBS eligibility, 83(b) filing mechanics beyond deadline itself, R&D credit).
- Securities offerings beyond standard SAFE / priced round.
- Employment law beyond at-will / offer-letter / CIIAA trio.
- Anything criminal, regulatory enforcement, or litigation-adjacent.
6. **Write atomically** to `advice-memos/{slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md` - `{path}.tmp` then rename. Slug = short kebab-case of question (e.g. `gdpr-applies-to-landing-page`, `do-i-need-nda-with-investors`, `dpa-with-stripe`).
7. **Append to `outputs.json`.** Read-merge-write atomically:
```json
{
"id": "<uuid v4>",
"type": "advice-memo",
"title": "Advice - <question short form>",
"summary": "<2-3 sentences - the bottom line + the next move>",
"path": "advice-memos/<slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md",
"status": "ready",
"attorneyReviewRequired": <true | false>,
"createdAt": "<ISO-8601>",
"updatedAt": "<ISO-8601>"
}
```
(Advice memos ship as `ready` - factual + cited; founder decides whether to act, not whether to approve draft.)
8. **Summarize to user.** One short paragraph in plain language: bottom line, next move, and whether a real lawyer should look at it. Never mention file names, paths, or the underlying memo location - just deliver the answer.
## Outputs
- `advice-memos/{slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md`
- Appends to `outputs.json` with `type: "advice-memo"`.Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!