Orchestrates the complete planning pipeline: product direction (ceo-review) -> architecture (eng-review) -> implementation plan (start) -> validation (validate) -> execution (execute). Run stages individually or let the orchestrator coordinate the full flow.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror --skill plan-pipeline --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Plan Pipeline?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gabrielmoreira-plan-pipeline)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: plan-pipeline
description: "Orchestrates the complete planning pipeline: product direction (ceo-review) -> architecture (eng-review) -> implementation plan (start) -> validation (validate) -> execution (execute). Run stages individually or let the orchestrator coordinate the full flow."
allowed-tools: Read Write Bash Task
effort: high
---
# Plan Pipeline Orchestrator
Orchestrates the complete plan-to-execution pipeline. Can run the full pipeline or a single isolated stage.
## Stages
| Stage | Skill | Purpose |
|-------|-------|---------|
| 1 | `/plan-pipeline:ceo-review` | Challenge the brief, lock product direction |
| 2 | `/plan-pipeline:eng-review` | Lock architecture, diagrams, and test matrix |
| 3 | `/plan-pipeline:start` | 5-phase planning: PRD, research, ADRs, task list |
| 4 | `/plan-pipeline:validate` | 2-layer validation before any code is written |
| 5 | `/plan-pipeline:execute` | Worktree isolation, parallel agents, quality gate, PR |
## Usage
```
/plan-pipeline # full pipeline, asks for context
/plan-pipeline --from=start # skip gates, start from planning phase
/plan-pipeline --from=validate # validate an existing plan
/plan-pipeline --from=execute # execute a validated plan
```
## When to Use Each Stage
**ceo-review**: use before any significant feature when the direction is not locked. Especially valuable when the request is specific (specificity signals collapsed solution space).
**eng-review**: use after direction is locked. Required for features with async components, external dependencies, or multi-step flows.
**start**: use for any non-trivial feature touching more than 2 files or involving architecture decisions.
**validate**: always before execute. The cost of validation is negligible against the cost of discovering issues mid-execution.
**execute**: after validate confirms all issues are resolved.
## Workflow
1. **Collect context**: what are we building, and what stage do we start from?
2. **ceo-review**: product direction gate (can be skipped with `--from=eng-review` or later)
3. **eng-review**: architecture gate (can be skipped with `--from=start` or later)
4. **CHECKPOINT**: ask user to confirm direction and architecture before planning
5. **start**: run 5-phase planning, produce `docs/plans/plan-{name}.md`
6. **CHECKPOINT**: present plan for review before validation
7. **validate**: 2-layer validation (structural + specialist agents)
8. **execute**: worktree isolation -> parallel agents -> quality gate -> PR
## Dependency Graph
```
ceo-review
|
eng-review
|
start
|
validate
|
execute
```
## Notes
Each stage writes its output to disk before the next stage begins. If the pipeline is interrupted, resume with `--from=<stage>` using the correct stage name. All decisions are recorded in `docs/plans/plan-{name}.md` and the corresponding ADRs in `docs/adr/`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!