End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels. Covers feature selection with Boruta/LASSO, classifier training with nested CV, and SHAP interpretation. Use when building and validating diagnostic or prognostic biomarker signatures from omics data.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror --skill biomarker-pipeline --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Biomarker Pipeline?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gabrielmoreira-biomarker-pipeline)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline
description: End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels. Covers feature selection with Boruta/LASSO, classifier training with nested CV, and SHAP interpretation. Use when building and validating diagnostic or prognostic biomarker signatures from omics data.
tool_type: python
primary_tool: sklearn
workflow: true
depends_on:
- machine-learning/biomarker-discovery
- machine-learning/model-validation
- machine-learning/omics-classifiers
- machine-learning/prediction-explanation
qc_checkpoints:
- after_selection: "Selected features >5 and <200, stability >0.6"
- after_cv: "Nested CV AUC >0.7, fold variance <0.1"
- after_interpretation: "Top 20 SHAP features: >50% overlap with selected features"
---
## Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scanpy 1.10+, scikit-learn 1.4+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- Python: `pip show <package>` then `help(module.function)` to check signatures
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed
package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
# Biomarker Discovery Pipeline
**"Build a validated biomarker panel from my omics data"** → Orchestrate feature selection (Boruta/LASSO), nested cross-validation classifier training, and SHAP interpretation to produce a robust, validated biomarker signature.
Complete pipeline from expression data to validated biomarker panels with classifier.
## Workflow Overview
```
Expression matrix + Metadata
|
v
[1. Data Preparation] -----> StandardScaler, train/test split
|
v
[2. Feature Selection] ----> Boruta or LASSO stability selection
|
v
[3. Model Training] -------> RandomForest/XGBoost with nested CV
|
v
[4. Model Interpretation] -> SHAP values, feature importance
|
v
[5. Validation] -----------> Hold-out test, bootstrap CI
|
v
Validated biomarker panel + classifier
```
## Step 1: Data Preparation
```python
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
expr = pd.read_csv('expression.csv', index_col=0)
meta = pd.read_csv('metadata.csv', index_col=0)
X = expr.T # samples x genes
y = meta.loc[X.index, 'condition'].values
# test_size=0.2: Standard 80/20 split; use 0.3 for <100 samples
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
X, y, test_size=0.2, stratify=y, random_state=42
)
# Fit scaler on training only to prevent data leakage
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)
```
**QC Checkpoint 1:** Check class balance, sample counts per group
- Minimum 10 samples per class recommended
- Classes should be reasonably balanced (ratio <3:1)
## Step 2: Feature Selection
### Option A: Boruta (All-Relevant Selection)
```python
from boruta import BorutaPy
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest, f_classif
# Pre-filter if >10k features
if X_train_scaled.shape[1] > 10000:
selector = SelectKBest(f_classif, k=5000)
selector.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
X_train_filt = X_train_scaled[:, selector.get_support()]
feature_mask = selector.get_support()
else:
X_train_filt = X_train_scaled
feature_mask = None
# max_depth=5: Shallow trees for stable importances
rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, max_depth=5, n_jobs=-1, random_state=42)
# max_iter=100: Usually sufficient; 200 if many tentative
boruta = BorutaPy(rf, n_estimators='auto', max_iter=100, random_state=42, verbose=0)
boruta.fit(X_train_filt, y_train)
selected_idx = boruta.support_
print(f'Selected {selected_idx.sum()} features')
```
### Option B: LASSO Stability Selection
```python
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegressionCV
import numpy as np
# n_bootstrap=100: Quick; use 500 for publication
n_bootstrap = 100
stability_scores = np.zeros(X_train_scaled.shape[1])
for i in range(n_bootstrap):
idx = np.random.choice(len(y_train), size=len(y_train), replace=True)
# Cs=10: 10 regularization values to search
model = LogisticRegressionCV(penalty='l1', solver='saga', Cs=10, cv=3, random_state=i, max_iter=1000)
model.fit(X_train_scaled[idx], y_train[idx])
stability_scores += (model.coef_[0] != 0).astype(int)
stability_scores /= n_bootstrap
# stability_threshold=0.6: Standard; 0.8 for strict
selected_idx = stability_scores > 0.6
print(f'Selected {selected_idx.sum()} features (stability >0.6)')
```
**QC Checkpoint 2:**
- Selected features: 5-200 range
- Too few (<5): lower threshold, increase iterations
- Too many (>200): increase threshold, add pre-filtering
## Step 3: Model Training with Nested CV
```python
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold, cross_val_score
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
X_train_sel = X_train_scaled[:, selected_idx]
X_test_sel = X_test_scaled[:, selected_idx]
# outer_cv=5: Standard for performance estimation
outer_cv = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
# n_estimators=100: Sufficient for most omics
clf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42, n_jobs=-1)
cv_scores = cross_val_score(clf, X_train_sel, y_train, cv=outer_cv, scoring='roc_auc')
print(f'Nested CV AUC: {cv_scores.mean():.3f} +/- {cv_scores.std():.3f}')
```
**QC Checkpoint 3:**
- AUC >0.7 acceptable, >0.8 good
- Fold variance <0.1 (stable performance)
- Check for overfitting: train AUC should not be >>test AUC
## Step 4: Model Interpretation
```python
import shap
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
clf.fit(X_train_sel, y_train)
# SHAP v0.47+: call explainer directly
explainer = shap.TreeExplainer(clf)
shap_values = explainer(X_train_sel)
# Beeswarm: shows importance AND direction
shap.plots.beeswarm(shap_values, max_display=20, show=False)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('shap_beeswarm.png', dpi=150, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.close()
# Extract top features
import numpy as np
mean_shap = np.abs(shap_values.values).mean(axis=0)
top_shap_idx = np.argsort(mean_shap)[-20:]
```
**QC Checkpoint 4:**
- Top 20 SHAP features should have >50% overlap with selected features
- SHAP directions should be biologically plausible
## Step 5: Final Validation
```python
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score, classification_report
import numpy as np
y_prob = clf.predict_proba(X_test_sel)[:, 1]
test_auc = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob)
print(f'Hold-out test AUC: {test_auc:.3f}')
# Bootstrap CI for AUC
# n_bootstrap=1000: Standard for publication-quality CI
n_bootstrap = 1000
boot_aucs = []
for i in range(n_bootstrap):
idx = np.random.choice(len(y_test), size=len(y_test), replace=True)
boot_aucs.append(roc_auc_score(y_test[idx], y_prob[idx]))
ci_lower, ci_upper = np.percentile(boot_aucs, [2.5, 97.5])
print(f'95% CI: [{ci_lower:.3f}, {ci_upper:.3f}]')
print(classification_report(y_test, clf.predict(X_test_sel)))
```
## Parameter Recommendations
| Step | Parameter | Recommendation |
|------|-----------|----------------|
| Split | test_size | 0.2 (standard), 0.3 for small datasets |
| Boruta | max_iter | 100 (sufficient), 200 if tentative features |
| LASSO | n_bootstrap | 100 (quick), 500 for publication |
| LASSO | stability_threshold | 0.6 (standard), 0.8 for strict |
| Nested CV | outer_folds | 5 (standard), 10 for small datasets |
| Nested CV | inner_folds | 3 (sufficient for tuning) |
| RF | n_estimators | 100-500 |
| XGBoost | learning_rate | 0.1 (conservative) |
## Troubleshooting
| Issue | Likely Cause | Solution |
|-------|--------------|----------|
| No features selected | Too strict threshold | Lower stability threshold, increase iterations |
| Too many features (>200) | Noisy data | Add pre-filtering, increase regularization |
| Low CV AUC (<0.6) | No signal, low power | Check data quality, add samples |
| High variance across folds | Small sample size | Use more folds, LOOCV |
| SHAP features differ from selected | Model using different signal | Review feature correlations |
## Export Results
```python
import pandas as pd
import joblib
# Save biomarker panel
feature_names = X_train.columns[selected_idx].tolist()
pd.DataFrame({'feature': feature_names}).to_csv('biomarker_panel.csv', index=False)
# Save model and scaler for deployment
joblib.dump(clf, 'biomarker_classifier.joblib')
joblib.dump(scaler, 'feature_scaler.joblib')
```
## Related Skills
- database-access/geo-data - Public expression cohorts for validation sets
- database-access/sra-data - Pull raw FASTQ for re-quantified validation cohorts
- database-access/uniprot-access - Protein-level features (sequence, GO terms, PTMs) for protein biomarkers
- machine-learning/biomarker-discovery - Detailed feature selection methods
- machine-learning/model-validation - Nested CV implementation details
- machine-learning/omics-classifiers - Classifier options and tuning
- machine-learning/prediction-explanation - SHAP and LIME interpretation
- differential-expression/de-results - Pre-filter with DE genes
- pathway-analysis/go-enrichment - Functional enrichment of biomarkers
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!