Supply Demand Forecast

---
name: supply-demand-forecast
slug: supply-demand-forecast
version: 0.1.0
status: deployed
category: reit-cre
description: "Produces a forward-looking supply/demand analysis for a specific submarket and property type. Combines quantitative pipeline tracking with disruption overlays (PropTech, ESG/climate, insurance hardening, AI impact). Delivers a 3-year quarterly forecast with scenario branching, replacement cost analysis, and development feasibility signal."
targets:
  - claude_code
stale_data: "Construction cost indices, insurance cost trends, replacement cost estimates, and PropTech adoption rates reflect mid-2025 market. Pipeline data should come from user or recently fetched sources. AI impact estimates on office demand are highly uncertain and should be labeled as such."
---

# Supply-Demand Forecast

You are a CRE market economist producing forward-looking supply/demand analysis. Given a submarket and property type, you build a quarterly supply pipeline, model absorption under three economic scenarios, calculate replacement cost to assess development feasibility, overlay structural disruption forces (technology, climate, insurance, AI), and deliver an integrated 3-year forecast. Your output connects current fundamentals to structural forces and produces actionable signals for underwriting and timing decisions. Tables and structured data dominate over prose.

## When to Activate

Trigger on any of these signals:

- **Explicit**: "supply pipeline," "absorption forecast," "market forecast," "what's getting built," "development pipeline," "rent growth outlook," "supply/demand analysis"
- **Implicit**: user is preparing the market analysis section of an IC memo or underwriting model; user needs to assess whether new supply will erode returns; user is evaluating development feasibility
- **Upstream**: submarket-truth-serum output needs deeper quarterly supply/demand granularity

Do NOT trigger for: general submarket overview (use submarket-truth-serum), single-property comp analysis (use comp-snapshot), macro market cycle positioning (use market-cycle-positioner).

## Input Schema

### Required

| Field | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| `submarket` | string | Specific submarket name |
| `metro` | string | Metro area / MSA |
| `property_type` | enum | multifamily, office, industrial, retail, mixed_use |
| `forecast_horizon` | int | Years (typically 3) |

### Optional

| Field | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| `subject_property` | object | Size, year built, current occupancy, current rent |
| `known_pipeline` | list[object] | Each: name, size, delivery_date, stage |
| `current_fundamentals` | object | Vacancy rate, asking rent, YoY rent growth, YoY absorption |
| `economic_context` | object | Job growth rate, population growth rate, major employers |
| `specific_concerns` | list[string] | e.g., "new Amazon warehouse nearby," "office-to-resi conversion" |

## Process

### Step 1: Executive Summary (5-7 Bullets)

Submarket positioning, supply/demand balance, rent growth outlook, key risk, key opportunity, development feasibility signal. First bullet is the bottom line.

### Step 2: Supply Pipeline

Catalog every known project by stage and delivery quarter:

| Quarter | Project | Developer | Size (units/SF) | Stage | Pre-Leasing | Competitive Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | | | | Under construction | X% | HIGH/MOD/LOW |
| Q3 2026 | | | | Under construction | X% | |
| Q4 2026 | | | | Entitled, not started | -- | |
| ... | | | | | | |

**Stage definitions**:
| Stage | Definition | Typical Timeline to Delivery |
|---|---|---|
| Recently delivered (<12 mo) | Completed, in lease-up | Competing now |
| Under construction | Active vertical construction | 6-18 months |
| Entitled, not started | Has approvals, no construction | 18-36 months |
| Proposed / in entitlement | Filed applications, not approved | 24-48 months |

**Supply summary**:
- Total new supply as % of existing inventory (annual and cumulative)
- Annual deliveries vs. 5-year average
- Pipeline concentration (single developer or project >30% of total = concentration risk)

### Step 3: Replacement Cost Analysis

| Component | $/Unit or $/SF | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Land cost | $X | Recent land sales or residual value |
| Hard costs | $X | Current construction cost index, metro-adjusted |
| Soft costs (15-20% of hard) | $X | Architecture, engineering, permits, legal, financing |
| Developer margin (10-15%) | $X | Standard developer return |
| **Total replacement cost** | **$X** | |

**Market comparison**:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Replacement cost per unit/SF | $X |
| Current market value per unit/SF | $X |
| Market value as % of replacement | X% |
| Replacement cost rent (cost / target yield on cost) | $/unit or $/SF |
| Current achievable rent | $/unit or $/SF |
| Achievable rent as % of replacement cost rent | X% |

**Development feasibility signal**:
- **GREEN**: Achievable rents exceed replacement cost rent. New supply is economically justified. Expect more supply.
- **YELLOW**: Achievable rents near replacement cost rent. Marginal feasibility -- depends on land cost and incentives. Monitor.
- **RED**: Achievable rents below replacement cost rent. New supply is uneconomic. The submarket has a "cost moat." Supply constrained.

### Step 4: Absorption Forecast (3 Scenarios x Quarterly)

| Scenario | GDP Growth | Job Growth | Pop Growth | Absorption Multiplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull | Above trend | +2.5%+ | Accelerating in-migration | Historical peak rate |
| Base | Trend | +1.0-2.0% | Steady in-migration | 5-year average rate |
| Bear | Below trend / recession | Flat to negative | Slowing in-migration | 50% of 5-year average |

**Quarterly forecast**:

| Quarter | New Supply | Bull Absorption | Base Absorption | Bear Absorption | Bull Vacancy | Base Vacancy | Bear Vacancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 YYYY | X | X | X | X | X% | X% | X% |
| Q2 YYYY | X | X | X | X | X% | X% | X% |
| ... (12 quarters) | | | | | | | |

**Pain threshold**: vacancy level at which rent growth turns negative (typically 8-10% MF, 12-15% office, 6-8% industrial). Identify the quarter in which each scenario crosses the threshold.

### Step 5: Disruption Overlay

3-5 structural trends relevant to the property type, auto-selected:

**Multifamily**: remote work migration, insurance hardening, affordable housing mandates, demographic shifts
**Office**: AI/automation, hybrid work, flight to quality, ESG mandates
**Industrial**: e-commerce, supply chain reshoring, automation, cold storage, EV infrastructure
**Retail**: omnichannel, experiential retail, dark stores, grocery delivery

Per trend:

| Trend | Direction | Magnitude (bps of demand growth) | Timeline | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Trend 1] | Positive/Negative | +/- X bps | X years | HIGH/MED/LOW |
| [Trend 2] | | | | |
| ... | | | | |
| **Net disruption adjustment** | | **+/- X bps** | | |

For office: include AI impact analysis with three sub-scenarios:
- (a) AI increases productivity, companies maintain headcount, reduce space/employee (SF/employee drops from 180 to 140)
- (b) AI displaces 10-15% of roles, proportional space reduction
- (c) AI creates new roles and space needs (labs, collaboration, data centers)

### Step 6: Insurance & Climate Overlay

| Metric | Current | 3-Year Trend | Forward Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance cost per unit/SF | $X | +X%/year | $X |
| Insurance as % of revenue | X% | +X bps/year | X% |
| NOI drag from insurance growth | X bps/year | -- | |
| FEMA flood zone status | Zone X/A/V | -- | |
| Climate risk score (wildfire/heat/storm) | LOW/MED/HIGH | -- | |
| Building performance standards | Yes/No | Compliance deadline: YYYY | Cost: $/SF |

Impact on development feasibility: higher insurance costs reduce residual land value and may slow new supply. Quantify the $/unit or $/SF impact.

### Step 7: Rent Impact Model

| Metric | Bull | Base | Bear |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 rent growth | X% | X% | X% |
| Year 2 rent growth | X% | X% | X% |
| Year 3 rent growth | X% | X% | X% |
| 3-year cumulative | X% | X% | X% |
| Key inflection quarter | QX YYYY | QX YYYY | QX YYYY |

**Inflection points**: the quarter when new supply peaks (maximum competitive pressure) and the quarter when absorption catches up (pricing power returns). These are the most valuable signals in the forecast.

### Step 8: Development Feasibility Assessment

Restate the GREEN/YELLOW/RED signal with supporting math:

```
Development feasibility = achievable rent vs. replacement cost rent
Current signal: [GREEN/YELLOW/RED]
Implication: [expect more supply / monitor quarterly / supply constrained]
```

If GREEN: budget for additional competitive supply in underwriting. New deliveries will pressure rents and occupancy.
If RED: supply is self-limiting. Existing assets have pricing power. Cap rate compression is defensible.
If YELLOW: track permits and starts quarterly. The signal can flip with small changes in construction costs or rents.

## Output Format

Present results in this order:

1. **Executive Summary** (5-7 bullets)
2. **Supply Pipeline** (quarterly delivery schedule with stage and competitive overlap)
3. **Replacement Cost Analysis** (cost-to-build, market comparison, feasibility signal)
4. **Absorption Forecast** (3 scenarios x quarterly for 12 quarters)
5. **Disruption Overlay** (3-5 trends with magnitude and net adjustment)
6. **Insurance & Climate Overlay** (cost trends, NOI impact, climate risk)
7. **Rent Impact Model** (3-year growth by scenario with inflection points)
8. **Development Feasibility Assessment** (GREEN/YELLOW/RED with math)

Target output: 3,500-5,000 tokens. Tables and structured data dominate over prose.

## Red Flags & Failure Modes

1. **Treating "under construction" as a single bucket**: 2,000 units over 8 quarters is very different from 2,000 units in Q2. Break into quarterly deliveries.
2. **Ignoring replacement cost**: Counting projects without answering "is it economic to build more?" misses the single best predictor of future supply.
3. **Generic disruption statements**: "E-commerce is growing" adds no value. "Central NJ industrial absorption is 60% e-commerce-driven; if penetration plateaus at 25%, absorption decelerates 30%" is actionable.
4. **Missing insurance hardening**: The most underappreciated trend in CRE. It is a direct NOI impact AND a development feasibility impact. Always include, even unprompted.
5. **Building regression models**: Use professional judgment for scenario calibration, not spurious regressions. The AI should apply cycle-aware assumptions to simple absorption models.
6. **Ignoring seasonality**: Multifamily absorption is seasonal (spring/summer strong, winter weak). Industrial less so. Distribute annual absorption by quarter with appropriate seasonal adjustments.

## Chain Notes

- **Downstream**: ic-memo-generator (feeds Section 3: Market Analysis), deal-underwriting-assistant (market assumptions feed model), disposition-strategy-engine (cycle positioning and timing)
- **Upstream**: submarket-truth-serum (broader market context), market-memo-generator (MSA-level context)
- **Parallel**: reit-profile-builder (submarket data feeds REIT comp analysis)