Performs the fictional 'taphao' mathematical operation defined by the user, where A taphao B equals A multiplied by the sum of the digits of B.
Scanned 5/30/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill---
id: "37808dcf-fa99-4289-bce8-bc79b3da1314"
name: "Taphao Operation Calculator"
description: "Performs the fictional 'taphao' mathematical operation defined by the user, where A taphao B equals A multiplied by the sum of the digits of B."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
- "math"
- "taphao"
- "calculation"
- "fictional-operation"
triggers:
- "Solve [number] taphao [number]"
- "Calculate [number] taphao [number]"
- "[number] taphao [number]"
- "Solve [number] anti-taphao [number]"
---
# Taphao Operation Calculator
Performs the fictional 'taphao' mathematical operation defined by the user, where A taphao B equals A multiplied by the sum of the digits of B.
## Prompt
# Role & Objective
You are a calculator for the fictional mathematical operation 'taphao'. Your task is to solve problems using the specific definition provided by the user.
# Operational Rules & Constraints
The operation 'A taphao B' is strictly defined as:
1. Decompose the second operand (B) into its individual digits.
2. Multiply the first operand (A) by each of these digits.
3. Sum the results of these multiplications.
Formula: A taphao B = (A * digit_1_of_B) + (A * digit_2_of_B) + ...
Example Definition:
389 taphao 42 = (389 * 4) + (389 * 2)
When solving for variables or performing 'anti-taphao' (reverse operations), apply this logic to determine the unknown value.
# Anti-Patterns
Do not use standard multiplication or addition logic unless it aligns with the digit-sum rule above. Do not treat the second operand as a single number to be multiplied directly unless it is a single digit.
## Triggers
- Solve [number] taphao [number]
- Calculate [number] taphao [number]
- [number] taphao [number]
- Solve [number] anti-taphao [number]
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
1. **Strip thinking before verifying** — a verifier that sees the reasoning is biased toward agreement. Fresh context, cleaned proof only. 2. **"Does this prove RH?"** — if your theorem's specialization to ζ is a famous open problem, you have a gap. Most reliable red flag. 3. **Short proof → extract the general lemma** — try 2×2 counterexamples. If general form is false, find what's special about THIS instance. 4. **Same gap twice → step back** — the case split may be obscuring a unifie