Phase 2 of the SRS workflow. Reads projects/{slug}/brainstorm.md and writes a comprehensive spec.md. No word limit.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add DangQuangSE/team-development-skills --skill sr-spec --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Sr Spec?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dangquangse-sr-spec-e4b58a16)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: sr-spec
description: >
Phase 2 of the SRS workflow. Reads projects/{slug}/brainstorm.md and writes
a comprehensive spec.md. No word limit.
---
# sr-spec
Goal: turn the brainstorm output into a structured, comprehensive spec.
No word limit — every section must be fully written.
---
## Step 0 — Identify Project
Ask user for the project slug (or detect from context):
Ask the user: "Which project to write spec for? (slug name or path to brainstorm.md)"
Read `projects/{slug}/brainstorm.md`. If it doesn't exist, tell the user to run
`$sr-brainstorm` first.
---
## Step 1 — Write spec.md
Write `projects/{slug}/spec.md`. No word limit. Every sub-section fully written.
### §1 — Project Overview
- System name (confirmed in brainstorm)
- Problem statement (what problem does this solve?)
- Solution summary (what does the system do, for whom, how)
- Primary success metrics (how will we know it's working?)
### §2 — Actors
One full entry per confirmed actor:
- Name and role
- Technical proficiency (non-technical | basic | intermediate | expert)
- Domain knowledge level
- Frequency and channel of use (web | mobile | API | all)
- Accessibility needs (if any)
- Data access scope (read | write | admin)
### §3 — Features (IN Scope)
For each confirmed feature:
- Feature name + cluster
- Description in user's own words (verbatim from brainstorm)
- AI-expanded detail (what sub-capabilities does this imply?)
- Actors who use it
- Priority tier: Essential | Conditional | Optional
### §4 — OUT of Scope
Table: Feature | Reason excluded | Planned for version
Every item from brainstorm OUT scope list.
### §5 — Technical Constraints
- Tech stack: languages, frameworks, runtime
- Hosting / deployment model
- Existing systems to integrate (name, protocol, direction)
- Security standards (auth model, encryption requirements)
- Compliance: applicable regulations + specific obligations
### §6 — Business Rules
Numbered list. Each rule: precise, testable statement.
Example: "BR-01: A user cannot place an order if their account balance is below the order total."
Cover every rule surfaced in brainstorm Round 5.
### §7 — NFR Baselines
Table format:
| ID | Characteristic | Target | Status |
|----|---------------|--------|--------|
| NFR-01 | Response Time | < 500ms at p95 | Confirmed |
| NFR-02 | Availability | 99.9% uptime | Confirmed |
| NFR-03 | Data Retention | 7 years | [TBD: legal to confirm \| owner: PM \| resolve-by: Sprint 1] |
### §8 — Assumptions
Numbered list. Each assumption: what is assumed + what happens if the assumption is wrong.
### §9 — Open Items
Every [TBD] from the brainstorm open-items section, with:
- What is unknown
- Who needs to answer it
- Impact if unresolved
---
## Step 2 — Confirm Before Finishing
After writing, do a self-check:
- Every confirmed actor appears in at least one feature entry?
- Every confirmed feature has a priority tier?
- Every [TBD] from brainstorm.md appears in §9?
- Every business rule is numbered and testable?
Fix any gaps before outputting the handoff message.
---
## Step 3 — Handoff
Output:
```
Spec written: projects/{slug}/spec.md
Actors: {count}
Features (IN): {count}
OUT scope: {count}
Business rules: {count}
NFR baselines: {count confirmed} confirmed, {count TBD} [TBD]
Open items: {count}
Next: $sr-plan → breaks this spec into per-section SRS plan files
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!