Maintain the association and integrity of [organization-defined] to [organization-defined].
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill ac-16-3-maintenance-of-attribute --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ac 16 3 Maintenance Of Attribute?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-ac-16-3-maintenance-of-attribute)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "AC-16(3)_maintenance-of-attribute-associations-by-system"
description: "Maintain the association and integrity of [organization-defined] to [organization-defined]."
category: "authorization"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- ac-16-3
- ac
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- aws
- azure
- gcp
- linux
- windows
cwe_ids:
- CWE-284
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- AC-16
severity_boost: {}
---
# AC-16(3) Maintenance of Attribute Associations by System
> **Enhancement of:** AC-16
## High-Level Description
**Family:** Access Control (AC)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
Maintaining the association and integrity of security and privacy attributes to subjects and objects with sufficient assurance helps to ensure that the attribute associations can be used as the basis of automated policy actions. The integrity of specific items, such as security configuration files, may be maintained through the use of an integrity monitoring mechanism that detects anomalies and changes that deviate from "known good" baselines. Automated policy actions include retention date expirations, access control decisions, information flow control decisions, and information disclosure decisions.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify AC-16(3) Maintenance of Attribute Associations by System is documented in SSP
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for AC-16(3)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control AC-16
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for AC-16(3) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| --------------- | -------------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| cloud-audit-mcp | Check IAM policies and access controls | `cloud_audit_iam_policies` |
| hackbrowser | Test web application access controls | `hackbrowser` |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Maintain the association and integrity of [organization-defined] to [organization-defined].
### Implementation Guidance
Maintaining the association and integrity of security and privacy attributes to subjects and objects with sufficient assurance helps to ensure that the attribute associations can be used as the basis of automated policy actions. The integrity of specific items, such as security configuration files, may be maintained through the use of an integrity monitoring mechanism that detects anomalies and changes that deviate from "known good" baselines. Automated policy actions include retention date expirations, access control decisions, information flow control decisions, and information disclosure decisions.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------- | ------------------------- |
| AC-16(3) Maintenance of Attribute Associations by System not implemented | High | Access Control |
| AC-16(3) partially implemented | Medium | Incomplete Access Control |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------- | ----------------------- |
| CWE-284 | Improper Access Control |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - AC-16(3)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=ac-16.3)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (none) reviewed
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!