Designs FILO structures with tranche-level pricing, distribution waterfalls, and intercreditor provisions within unitranche financing. Use when structuring FILO tranches, analyzing split economics, or designing blended pricing.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill structuring-first-lien-last-out-facilities --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Structuring First Lien Last Out Facilities?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-structuring-first-lien-last-out-facilities)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: structuring-first-lien-last-out-facilities
language: en
description: Designs FILO structures with tranche-level pricing, distribution waterfalls, and intercreditor provisions within unitranche financing. Use when structuring FILO tranches, analyzing split economics, or designing blended pricing.
tags:
- credit-and-institutional-lending
- credit
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Credit Markets
- Leveraged Lending
- Direct Lending
document_types:
- Report
skill_modes:
- Analysis
---
# Structuring First Lien Last Out Facilities
Designs FILO structures with tranche-level pricing, distribution waterfalls, and intercreditor provisions within unitranche financing.
## When To Use
- Structuring a unitranche facility that splits into first-out (FO) and last-out (LO) tranches with differentiated economics
- Analyzing blended yield versus tranche-level pricing to determine FILO feasibility against a traditional first lien / second lien stack
- Designing or reviewing the Agreement Among Lenders (AAL) governing FO/LO intercreditor rights
- Evaluating FILO economics for a direct lender syndicating the FO piece to a bank or other lower-cost capital provider
- Modeling distribution waterfalls, default interest allocation, and recovery scenarios across tranches
## Inputs To Gather
- **Deal parameters**: Total facility size, FO/LO split (dollar amounts and percentages), maturity, amortization schedule
- **Pricing terms**: FO coupon (spread + floor), LO coupon (spread + floor), OID on each tranche, any PIK toggle or PIK component on the LO
- **Blended yield target**: Weighted-average cost the borrower sees as a single unitranche rate
- **Credit metrics**: Borrower EBITDA, total leverage, FO leverage, LO leverage, fixed charge coverage ratio
- **Intercreditor provisions**: Voting thresholds for amendments/waivers, standstill periods, purchase option triggers, buyout pricing mechanics
- **Waterfall mechanics**: Order of payments (interest, principal, fees), default interest allocation, excess cash flow sweep split
- **Recovery assumptions**: Collateral value estimates, expected recovery rates by tranche under stress scenarios
- **Market context**: Comparable FILO transactions, current spread benchmarks for FO (bank market) and LO (direct lending market)
## Workflow
1. **Define the tranche architecture**
- Set FO and LO commitment amounts as a percentage of total facility size
- Determine whether the LO tranche carries a PIK component, cash-pay coupon, or blended structure
- Confirm maturity alignment — typically co-terminus, but flag any maturity mismatch risk
2. **Build blended pricing analysis**
- Calculate the blended all-in yield the borrower pays across FO and LO tranches
- Compare blended cost against alternatives: traditional first lien/second lien, standalone unitranche, or syndicated TLB
- Model OID amortization and upfront fee impact on effective yield for each tranche holder
3. **Structure the distribution waterfall**
- Define payment priority: FO interest → LO interest → FO scheduled amortization → LO scheduled amortization → excess cash flow sweep allocation
- Specify default interest treatment — whether it flows pro rata or is allocated entirely to FO
- Address make-whole and prepayment premium allocation between tranches
- Model the waterfall under base case, downside, and default scenarios
4. **Draft intercreditor provisions (AAL terms)**
- **Voting rights**: Identify which amendments require unanimous consent versus FO-only or LO-only consent [VERIFY — AAL terms are deal-specific and heavily negotiated]
- **Standstill period**: Specify duration during which LO lenders cannot exercise remedies after an event of default (typically 90–180 days)
- **Purchase option**: Define the LO lender's right to purchase FO claims at par (or par plus accrued) upon a default trigger
- **Buyout mechanics**: Set pricing for the buyout option — par, par plus accrued, or a premium
- **Release and DIP provisions**: Address how FO and LO rights interact in a bankruptcy filing, including DIP financing consent and collateral release
5. **Run recovery and stress analysis**
- Model collateral recovery at multiple enterprise value haircuts (e.g., 20%, 40%, 60% decline)
- Calculate recovery rates for FO and LO tranches separately under each scenario
- Determine the enterprise value breakpoint at which LO recovery drops below a target threshold
- Assess whether FO sizing provides adequate cushion under stress
6. **Benchmark against market**
- Compare FO spread to bank-market first lien spreads for similar credit profiles
- Compare LO spread to direct lending second lien or stretched senior pricing
- Validate that the blended yield falls within market norms for the borrower's leverage and sector
## Output
- **FILO Structure Summary**: Tranche sizes, pricing (coupon, OID, PIK if applicable), blended all-in yield, and key dates
- **Waterfall Exhibit**: Step-by-step payment cascade under performing, stressed, and default scenarios with dollar allocations to each tranche
- **Intercreditor Term Sheet**: AAL provisions covering voting, standstill, purchase option, buyout pricing, and bankruptcy-related rights
- **Recovery Analysis Table**: FO and LO recovery percentages at multiple enterprise value haircut levels
- **Blended Pricing Comparison**: Side-by-side analysis of FILO blended cost versus alternative capital structures
- **Key Risk Flags**: Identified issues such as thin LO cushion, aggressive standstill periods, or blended yield above market
## Quality Checks
- Blended yield calculation reconciles exactly to the weighted average of FO and LO all-in costs
- Waterfall allocations sum to total available cash in each scenario — no leakage or rounding gaps
- Intercreditor provisions are internally consistent (e.g., standstill period length aligns with purchase option trigger timeline)
- Recovery analysis uses collateral values consistent with the deal's appraisal or enterprise valuation basis
- FO leverage and LO leverage correctly map to the borrower's capital structure and priority of claims
- All jurisdiction-dependent provisions (UCC perfection, intercreditor enforceability) are marked [VERIFY]
- PIK accrual mechanics, if applicable, are modeled through maturity with compounding correctly applied
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!