Builds cap table models with round-by-round dilution, ESOP expansion, convertible note conversion, and exit waterfall analysis. Use when modeling cap tables, projecting ownership dilution, or calculating exit proceeds distribution.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill modeling-venture-cap-tables --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Modeling Venture Cap Tables?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-modeling-venture-cap-tables)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: modeling-venture-cap-tables
language: en
description: Builds cap table models with round-by-round dilution, ESOP expansion, convertible note conversion, and exit waterfall analysis. Use when modeling cap tables, projecting ownership dilution, or calculating exit proceeds distribution.
tags:
- modeling
- venture-capital
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Venture Capital
- Seed/Series Investing
- Startup Ecosystems
document_types:
- Financial Model
skill_modes:
- Modeling
- Forecasting
---
# Modeling Venture Cap Tables
## When To Use
- Modeling a new priced round (Seed, Series A–D+) to project post-money ownership
- Converting SAFEs or convertible notes into equity at a triggering event
- Expanding or creating an ESOP pool and quantifying dilutive impact on existing holders
- Running exit waterfall scenarios (M&A, IPO, liquidation) to calculate per-share proceeds
- Preparing investor-facing ownership summaries for fundraising or board reporting
## Inputs To Gather
- **Current cap table**: Authorized shares, outstanding common shares by holder, preferred share classes with certificate of incorporation terms (liquidation preference multiple, participation rights, anti-dilution type)
- **ESOP details**: Pool size (authorized vs. issued vs. unallocated), vesting schedules, exercise prices, early-exercise provisions
- **Convertible instruments**: SAFE or note principal, accrued interest, valuation cap, discount rate, conversion trigger, MFN provisions, pro-rata side letters
- **Proposed round terms**: Pre-money valuation, new money invested, investor allocation, price per share, new ESOP pool target (pre- or post-money)
- **Exit assumptions** (if running waterfall): Total exit value range, transaction expenses, escrow/holdback, acceleration triggers for unvested options
Flag any missing instrument with [VERIFY] — an overlooked note or warrant can materially change dilution.
## Workflow
1. **Reconstruct the pre-round cap table**
- List each holder class: founders (common), employees (options/RSAs), prior investors (preferred series), outstanding warrants, convertible instruments
- Calculate fully-diluted share count using the treasury-stock method for in-the-money options
- Confirm authorized-share headroom; flag if a charter amendment is needed [VERIFY]
2. **Model ESOP expansion (if applicable)**
- Determine whether the new pool is carved from pre-money (founder-dilutive) or post-money (all-shareholder-dilutive)
- Calculate shares needed: target pool % × post-money fully-diluted shares − existing unallocated pool
- Show incremental dilution to each holder class
3. **Convert SAFEs and convertible notes**
- For each instrument, compute the conversion price: lower of (valuation cap / pre-money fully-diluted shares) and (price per share × (1 − discount))
- Add accrued interest to note principal before dividing by conversion price
- Apply MFN adjustments if a later SAFE has more favorable terms [VERIFY specific SAFE form version]
- Sum all conversion shares and add to fully-diluted count before pricing the new round (if pre-money conversion) or after (if post-money SAFE)
4. **Price the new round**
- Pre-money valuation ÷ fully-diluted shares (including new ESOP and converted instruments) = price per share
- New shares issued = new investment ÷ price per share
- Post-money valuation = pre-money + new investment
- Populate per-holder ownership on a fully-diluted and as-converted basis
5. **Build exit waterfall**
- Layer 1: Return of liquidation preferences (non-participating preferred gets 1× or stated multiple; participating preferred gets preference + pro-rata)
- Layer 2: If remaining proceeds exist, allocate pro-rata to common and participating preferred (subject to any cap on participation)
- Layer 3: Compare conversion value vs. preference value for each preferred series — holders elect the higher payout
- Model at multiple exit values (e.g., 0.5×, 1×, 2×, 5×, 10× of post-money) to show breakpoints where preferred converts
6. **Sensitivity and scenario analysis**
- Vary pre-money valuation ±20% and show impact on founder dilution
- Toggle participation vs. non-participation for latest preferred series
- Show ESOP pool impact at 10%, 15%, 20% targets
- If multiple convertible instruments exist, model conversion order impact
## Output
- **Summary ownership table**: Holder name, share class, shares held, % on as-converted fully-diluted basis — both pre-round and post-round columns
- **Conversion schedule**: Each SAFE/note with principal, cap, discount, conversion price, and shares issued
- **ESOP allocation table**: Authorized, issued, unallocated, and new shares created
- **Exit waterfall matrix**: Rows = holder classes, columns = exit value scenarios, cells = gross proceeds per class and per share
- **Key assumptions register**: Every assumed input listed with source or [VERIFY] flag
## Quality Checks
- Ownership percentages must sum to exactly 100% on every basis presented (issued, fully-diluted, as-converted)
- Post-money valuation must equal pre-money valuation + total new money (including converted instruments if priced in)
- Conversion prices must reflect the lower of cap-derived and discount-derived price — check both paths
- Liquidation waterfall total distributed must equal the exit value minus expenses at every scenario point
- Confirm anti-dilution provisions (broad-based weighted average vs. full ratchet) are applied correctly if a down round is modeled [VERIFY governing documents]
- Verify authorized share count supports all modeled issuances; flag if board/stockholder approval is required
- Cross-check option pool shuffle math: new pool shares should make the post-close unallocated pool hit the target percentage, not the gross pool
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!