Systematizes the \"search for existing tools, exploits, and techniques before writing custom ones\" workflow.
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brucesongs/kali-claw --skill search-first --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Search First?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brucesongs-search-first)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: search-first
description: "Systematizes the \"search for existing tools, exploits, and techniques before writing custom ones\" workflow."
origin: openclaw
version: "0.2.0.2"
compatibility:
- openclaw
- claude-code
- cursor
- windsurf
allowed-tools:
- Bash
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- WebSearch
- WebFetch
- Agent
defense_triple_required: false
metadata:
domain: workflow
tool_count: 0
guide_count: 5
mitre: "N/A (non-attack meta skill)"
last_reviewed: "2026-07-26"
---
# Skill: Search First — Research Before You Exploit
> **Supplementary Files**:
> - `payloads.md` — Search templates for ExploitDB, GitHub, Metasploit, Nuclei, and Kali packages with evaluation scoring
> - `test-cases.md` — Structured test cases for CVE discovery, tool discovery, technique research, and custom build decisions
## Summary
Search First skill domain covering workflow operations.
**Domain**: workflow
## Description
Systematizes the "search for existing tools, exploits, and techniques before writing custom ones" workflow. In penetration testing, this means: before developing a custom exploit or tool, search for existing solutions in exploit databases, security tools, GitHub repositories, and community resources.
This skill prevents reinventing the wheel and ensures kali-claw leverages the full ecosystem of existing security tools and known exploit techniques.
## Use Cases
- Before writing a custom exploit: search Exploit-DB, GitHub, and security blogs for existing PoCs
- Before building a reconnaissance tool: check if nmap scripts, Nuclei templates, or Metasploit modules already exist
- Before developing a post-exploitation technique: search for existing tools and frameworks
- When facing an unfamiliar technology: research known vulnerabilities and attack paths before testing
- Before creating automation scripts: check if existing tools already provide the capability
## Methodology
### Search-First Decision Flow
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. NEED ANALYSIS │
│ Define what capability is needed │
│ Identify target technology/constraints │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2. PARALLEL SEARCH │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ ExploitDB│ │ GitHub │ │ Security │ │
│ │ MSF/NS │ │ PoCs │ │ Blogs │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 3. EVALUATE │
│ Score: reliability, compatibility, │
│ OPSEC, maintenance, detection risk │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 4. DECIDE │
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ Use │ │ Modify │ │ Build │ │
│ │ as-is │ │ /Wrap │ │ Custom │ │
│ └─────────┘ └──────────┘ └─────────┘ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5. EXECUTE │
│ Run existing tool / Modify template / │
│ Write minimal custom exploit │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Decision Matrix
| Signal | Action |
|--------|--------|
| Exact exploit exists for target version | **Use** — run directly, verify results |
| Similar exploit exists for adjacent version | **Modify** — adapt parameters/payloads |
| Multiple partial tools cover the need | **Compose** — chain existing tools together |
| Nothing suitable found | **Build** — write custom, but informed by research |
### Search Sources by Category
#### Exploit & Vulnerability Search
```bash
# Exploit-DB local search
searchsploit apache 2.4.49 remote
searchsploit -x 12345 # Examine exploit code
# GitHub PoC search
gh search code "CVE-2025-12345" --limit 20
gh search repos "<tool-name> exploit" --sort stars
# Metasploit module search
msfconsole -x "search type:exploit name:<keyword>"
# Nuclei template search
nuclei -tl -tags cve | grep "<keyword>"
```
#### Tool & Capability Search
```bash
# Kali package search
apt search <keyword>
dpkg -l | grep <tool>
# GitHub security tool search
gh search repos "<capability> security tool" --sort stars --limit 20
# Exploit framework module search
msfconsole -x "search type:auxiliary name:<keyword>"
msfconsole -x "search type:post name:<keyword>"
```
#### Technique & Methodology Search
```bash
# MITRE ATT&CK technique lookup
# Web: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/enterprise/
# HackTricks methodology
# Web: https://book.hacktricks.wiki/
# PayloadsAllTheThings
# Web: https://github.com/swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings
# GTFOBins / LOLBAS
# Web: https://gtfobins.github.io/
# Web: https://lolbas-project.github.io/
```
### Integration with Other Skills
- **With `deep-research`**: Use deep-research for broad topic investigation, search-first for quick tool/exploit lookup
- **With `security-bounty-hunter`**: Search for existing reports before hunting similar vulnerabilities
- **With `terminal-ops`**: Execute found tools with evidence capture protocol
- **With `osint`**: Combine OSINT gathering with tool search for comprehensive preparation
## Detection Methods
### Search Pattern Audit
- **Anomalous query volume**: Single token consuming >10x typical search rate.
- **Cross-domain correlation**: Aggregating data from many domains (OSINT signature).
### SIEM Detection Rules
- **Splunk SPL**: `index=search | stats count by user | where count > 1000`
## Defense Evasion Techniques
### Stealth Search
- **Distribute across accounts**: Use multiple tokens; below per-token limits.
- **Slow & methodical**: Pace queries below anomaly threshold.
- **Cache results**: Avoid re-querying same data.
- **Mimic legitimate usage**: Use natural language queries matching typical patterns.
## Anti-Patterns
- **Jumping to custom code**: Writing an exploit without checking Exploit-DB or Metasploit
- **Ignoring version specificity**: Using an exploit for the wrong version without adaptation
- **Over-customizing**: Wrapping a tool so heavily it loses its original capability
- **Tool hoarding**: Installing every tool found instead of mastering the best one
## Examples
### Example 1: Exploit Apache Path Traversal
```
Need: Exploit path traversal in Apache 2.4.49
Search: searchsploit apache 2.4.49 path traversal
Found: CVE-2021-41773, multiple PoCs on GitHub
Action: USE — curl-based PoC is sufficient
Result: curl "http://target/cgi-bin/.%2e/%2e%2e/etc/passwd"
```
### Example 2: Active Directory Enumeration
```
Need: Enumerate AD domain from compromised Windows host
Search: GitHub "Active Directory enumeration tool"
Found: BloodHound, SharpHound, ldapsearch-ad, Certipy
Action: USE — BloodHound/SharpHound is the standard
Result: Run SharpHound, import to BloodHound for analysis
```
### Example 3: TLS Reverse Shell
```
Need: Reverse shell bypassing egress filtering (only port 443)
Search: GitHub "reverse shell tls encrypted"
Found: Several TLS-encrypted shell tools
Action: MODIFY — adapt existing TLS shell for constraint
Result: Minimal custom wrapper around existing tool
```
## Orchestration
### ECC Loop Pattern
- **Pattern**: Learning Cycle (search → evaluate → decide → refine search if needed)
- **Rationale**: Searching is iterative — initial searches inform subsequent queries, and results are refined based on relevance scoring until a suitable solution is found or the decision is made to build custom
- **Integration**: deep-research (broad topic investigation), terminal-ops (execute found tools), continuous-learning (remember which sources are reliable per topic), docker-patterns (lab verification of found exploits)
### Cross-Skill Pipeline
```
search-first → [any attack skill] → verification-loop
↓ ↑
deep-research (broader context) continuous-learning (persist tool knowledge)
```
### Quality Gate
- Pre-condition: Need clearly defined (service/version/technique)
- Post-condition: At least one result evaluated with scoring matrix, or documented decision to build custom
- Verification: Selected tool/exploit tested against lab or verified against documentation
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!