Skip to content
Back to skills

Dev Security Review

ASecurity

Use to review software security across auth, permissions, input validation, secrets, dependencies, workflows, and config.

  • 21 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 6, 2026
developmentrustci/cdsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 6, 2026

npx -y skills add BlueSkyXN/Codex-is-all-you-need --skill dev-security-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Dev Security Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Dev Security Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/blueskyxn-dev-security-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/blueskyxn-dev-security-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: dev-security-review
description: Use to review software security across auth, permissions, input validation, secrets, dependencies, workflows, and config.
metadata:
  version: "0.3"
  updated: "2026-06-12"
---

# Security review workflow

Use this workflow when reviewing software for security risk.

## Steps

1. Scope the review.
   - Diff, module, endpoint, workflow, config, dependency, or repository area.
   - Identify trust boundaries and attacker-controlled inputs.

2. Inspect high-risk surfaces.
   - Authentication and authorization
   - Input validation and injection
   - File and path handling
   - Network calls and SSRF risk
   - Secrets and tokens
   - Deserialization and template rendering
   - CI/CD permissions
   - Dependency and supply-chain risk

3. Separate findings.
   - Confirmed vulnerability
   - Likely risk needing reproduction
   - Hardening suggestion
   - False positive or accepted risk

4. Provide evidence.
   - File path and symbol
   - Data/control path
   - Reproduction command or request when safe
   - Impact and exploit preconditions

5. Recommend fixes.
   - Minimal remediation
   - Tests or checks to add
   - Operational follow-up if code change is not enough

## Output

Return:

1. Findings by severity
2. Evidence
3. Exploit or failure path
4. Remediation
5. Test or verification plan

## Do not

- Do not report generic checklist items without repo evidence.
- Do not print or expose real secrets unnecessarily.
- Do not modify files when acting as a reviewer unless explicitly asked.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.