Skip to content
Back to skills

Solution Review

ASecurity

Review already-applied code changes against the original task statement or task folder artifacts under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/`. Use when implementation work is done and Claude must verify scope coverage, detect mismatches or regressions, assess verification gaps, and write a review summary before handoff or merge.

  • 232 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
developmentgorails

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add blockscout/blockscout-rs --skill solution-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Solution Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Solution Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/blockscout-solution-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/blockscout-solution-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: solution-review
description: Review already-applied code changes against the original task statement or task folder artifacts under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/`. Use when implementation work is done and Claude must verify scope coverage, detect mismatches or regressions, assess verification gaps, and write a review summary before handoff or merge.
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Solution Review Skill

Follow the workflow defined in @../../../.memory-bank/workflows/solution-review.md

## Required Guardrails

- Review against the original task source of truth first: `task.md`, `solution_X.md`, `implementation-plan-X.md`, `coding-task-X.md`, or the user-provided task statement.
- Inspect the actual applied change, not just the final code shape. Read the relevant diff, changed files, and nearby tests.
- Treat this as a post-implementation review step, not a chance to silently finish missing work.
- Separate confirmed findings, uncertainties, and verification gaps.
- Prefer concrete evidence with file paths, acceptance-criteria mapping, and commands that were or were not run.
- Write the review artifact into the existing task folder as `review.md` when the task lives under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/`.

## Minimal Starting Reads

Start with:

- `../../../.memory-bank/project-context.md`
- `../../../.memory-bank/architecture.md`
- `../../../.memory-bank/gotchas.md`
- `../../../tmp/tasks/<task-name>/task.md` if present
- `../../../tmp/tasks/<task-name>/solution_*.md` if present
- `../../../tmp/tasks/<task-name>/implementation-plan*.md` if present
- `../../../tmp/tasks/<task-name>/coding-task*.md` if present

Then read the current diff, changed files, tests, configs, and any user-provided task statement needed to judge whether the implementation is complete and correct.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.