Skip to content
Back to skills

Compliance Mapping

ASecurity

This skill should be used when the user asks about "compliance mapping", "PCI-DSS", "HIPAA", "SOC 2", "NIST CSF", "regulatory requirements", "compliance report", or needs to map security findings to compliance framework requirements.

  • 24 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 26, 2026
securityrustgosqlsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add allsmog/vuln-scout --skill compliance-mapping --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Compliance Mapping?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Compliance Mapping
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/allsmog-compliance-mapping/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/allsmog-compliance-mapping)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: Compliance Mapping
description: This skill should be used when the user asks about "compliance mapping", "PCI-DSS", "HIPAA", "SOC 2", "NIST CSF", "regulatory requirements", "compliance report", or needs to map security findings to compliance framework requirements.
version: 1.0.0
---

# Compliance Framework Mapping

## Purpose

Map VulnScout security findings to compliance framework requirements. This enables security teams to understand the regulatory impact of discovered vulnerabilities and prioritize remediation based on compliance obligations.

## Supported Frameworks

### PCI-DSS v4.0

Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard for organizations handling cardholder data.

| Requirement | Description | VulnScout Finding Types |
|-------------|-------------|------------------------|
| 6.2.1 | Secure development practices | All code-level findings |
| 6.2.2 | Software security training | Recurring pattern findings |
| 6.2.3 | Code review before release | Unverified findings in diff |
| 6.2.4 | Prevent common vulnerabilities | sql-injection, xss, command-injection, path-traversal |
| 6.3.1 | Identify vulnerabilities via scanning | All findings from /scan |
| 6.3.2 | Maintain inventory of custom software | Framework detection results |
| 6.4.1 | Public-facing web app protection | ssrf, xss, csrf, open-redirect |
| 6.4.2 | Automated technical solution for web attacks | WAF findings, missing CSP |
| 6.5.1-6.5.6 | Address common coding vulnerabilities | Injection, auth bypass, XSS, access control |

### HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.312)

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act technical safeguards.

| Section | Description | VulnScout Finding Types |
|---------|-------------|------------------------|
| 164.312(a)(1) | Access Control | access-control, idor, business-logic |
| 164.312(a)(2)(i) | Unique User Identification | auth-bypass, session fixation |
| 164.312(a)(2)(iii) | Automatic Logoff | session management findings |
| 164.312(a)(2)(iv) | Encryption at Rest | cryptographic-failures, hardcoded-secret |
| 164.312(b) | Audit Controls | logging-failures |
| 164.312(c)(1) | Integrity Controls | sql-injection, deserialization, ssti |
| 164.312(c)(2) | Authentication of ePHI | auth-bypass, hardcoded-secret |
| 164.312(d) | Person/Entity Authentication | auth-bypass, insecure-randomness |
| 164.312(e)(1) | Transmission Security | cryptographic-failures, ssrf |
| 164.312(e)(2)(i) | Integrity Controls (transmission) | ssti, xss, command-injection |
| 164.312(e)(2)(ii) | Encryption in Transit | cryptographic-failures |

### SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria

Service Organization Control 2 for SaaS and cloud service providers.

| Criteria | Description | VulnScout Finding Types |
|----------|-------------|------------------------|
| CC6.1 | Logical and Physical Access | access-control, idor, auth-bypass |
| CC6.2 | Credential Management | hardcoded-secret, insecure-randomness |
| CC6.3 | Access Roles and Responsibilities | access-control, business-logic |
| CC6.6 | System Boundary Protection | ssrf, open-redirect, cors-misconfig |
| CC6.7 | Data Flow Restrictions | path-traversal, xxe, deserialization |
| CC6.8 | Malicious Software Prevention | command-injection, code-injection, ssti |
| CC7.1 | System Monitoring | logging-failures, exception-handling |
| CC7.2 | Anomaly Detection | insecure-randomness, race-condition |
| CC7.3 | Security Event Evaluation | logging-failures |
| CC7.4 | Incident Response | All critical/high findings |
| CC8.1 | Change Management | Findings in diff (--since-commit) |

### NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0

| Function | Category | VulnScout Finding Types |
|----------|----------|------------------------|
| **Identify** | ID.AM - Asset Management | Framework detection, scope results |
| **Identify** | ID.RA - Risk Assessment | Threat model, STRIDE analysis |
| **Protect** | PR.AC - Access Control | access-control, idor, auth-bypass |
| **Protect** | PR.DS - Data Security | sql-injection, path-traversal, cryptographic-failures |
| **Protect** | PR.IP - Protective Processes | All remediated findings |
| **Protect** | PR.MA - Maintenance | Diff-aware scan results |
| **Detect** | DE.AE - Anomalies and Events | logging-failures, exception-handling |
| **Detect** | DE.CM - Continuous Monitoring | /scan --since-commit results |
| **Respond** | RS.AN - Analysis | Verified findings with evidence |
| **Recover** | RC.IM - Improvements | Patch advisor recommendations |

## Finding Type to Compliance Mapping

| Finding Type | PCI-DSS | HIPAA | SOC 2 | NIST CSF |
|-------------|---------|-------|-------|----------|
| sql-injection | 6.2.4, 6.5.1 | 164.312(c)(1) | CC6.8 | PR.DS |
| xss | 6.2.4, 6.4.1 | 164.312(e)(2)(i) | CC6.8 | PR.DS |
| command-injection | 6.2.4 | 164.312(e)(2)(i) | CC6.8 | PR.DS |
| path-traversal | 6.2.4 | 164.312(a)(1) | CC6.7 | PR.DS |
| ssrf | 6.4.1 | 164.312(e)(1) | CC6.6 | PR.DS |
| deserialization | 6.2.4 | 164.312(c)(1) | CC6.7 | PR.DS |
| ssti | 6.2.4 | 164.312(c)(1) | CC6.8 | PR.DS |
| xxe | 6.2.4 | 164.312(c)(1) | CC6.7 | PR.DS |
| access-control | 6.5.4 | 164.312(a)(1) | CC6.1 | PR.AC |
| auth-bypass | 6.5.3 | 164.312(d) | CC6.1 | PR.AC |
| hardcoded-secret | 6.2.4 | 164.312(a)(2)(iv) | CC6.2 | PR.AC |
| cryptographic-failures | 6.2.4 | 164.312(e)(2)(ii) | CC6.2 | PR.DS |
| logging-failures | 6.2.4 | 164.312(b) | CC7.1 | DE.AE |
| insecure-randomness | 6.2.4 | 164.312(d) | CC7.2 | PR.DS |
| idor | 6.5.4 | 164.312(a)(1) | CC6.1 | PR.AC |
| ldap-injection | 6.2.4, 6.5.1 | 164.312(c)(1) | CC6.8 | PR.DS |

## Report Integration

When generating a compliance-aware report, use the `--compliance` flag:

```
/vuln-scout:report --compliance pci-dss,hipaa,soc2
```

This appends a Compliance Impact section to the report:

```markdown
## Compliance Impact

### PCI-DSS v4.0
| Requirement | Status | Findings |
|-------------|--------|----------|
| 6.2.4 | FAIL | 3 injection findings |
| 6.4.1 | PASS | No public-facing web app findings |

### HIPAA 164.312
| Section | Status | Findings |
|---------|--------|----------|
| 164.312(a)(1) | FAIL | 2 access control findings |
| 164.312(c)(1) | FAIL | 1 SQL injection finding |
```

## Methodology

### Step 1: Determine Applicable Frameworks
Ask the user which compliance frameworks apply to their organization.

### Step 2: Run Standard Audit
```
/vuln-scout:full-audit .
```

### Step 3: Map Findings to Requirements
Use the mapping table above to categorize each finding by its compliance impact.

### Step 4: Prioritize by Compliance Risk
Findings that affect multiple frameworks should be prioritized higher.

### Step 5: Generate Compliance Report
Include both the technical finding details and the compliance requirement references.

## Integration with Other Skills

- Use **business-logic** for access control requirement mapping (PCI-DSS 6.5.4, HIPAA 164.312(a))
- Use **cryptographic-failures** for encryption requirements (HIPAA 164.312(e), PCI-DSS 6.2.4)
- Use **logging-failures** for audit control requirements (HIPAA 164.312(b), SOC 2 CC7.1)
- Use **security-misconfiguration** for baseline hardening requirements

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.