Scans Azure Bicep templates for security misconfigurations and compliance violations. Detects issues like public endpoints, missing encryption, overly permissive access, disabled logging, and insecure defaults. Produces a prioritized findings report with remediation guidance. USE FOR: Bicep security review, IaC security scanning, Azure resource hardening, pre-deployment security checks, compliance validation.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add aibot88/sec_skill_store --skill bicep-security-scanner --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bicep Security Scanner?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aibot88-bicep-security-scanner)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bicep-security-scanner
description: >
Scans Azure Bicep templates for security misconfigurations and compliance violations.
Detects issues like public endpoints, missing encryption, overly permissive access,
disabled logging, and insecure defaults. Produces a prioritized findings report with
remediation guidance. USE FOR: Bicep security review, IaC security scanning,
Azure resource hardening, pre-deployment security checks, compliance validation.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit
version: 1.0.0
---
# Bicep Security Scanner
Analyze Azure Bicep templates for security misconfigurations, compliance gaps, and hardening opportunities. This skill scans `.bicep` files in the repository, identifies security issues, and provides actionable remediation with corrected Bicep snippets.
## When to Use
- Before deploying Bicep templates to any environment
- During pull request review of infrastructure changes
- When auditing existing IaC for security posture
- When preparing for compliance assessments (CIS, Azure Security Benchmark)
## Analysis Procedure
### Step 1: Discover Bicep Files
Use glob to find all `.bicep` files in the repository:
```
**/*.bicep
```
Also check for `bicepconfig.json` to understand any linter rules already in place.
### Step 2: Run the Python Scanner
Execute the embedded Python scanner against discovered files to extract resource definitions and flag known anti-patterns:
```bash
python3 "$(dirname "$0")/scripts/scan_bicep.py" --path <repo-root>
```
The scanner checks for:
- Storage accounts without HTTPS-only enforcement
- Storage accounts with blob public access enabled
- SQL servers without auditing enabled
- Key Vaults with soft delete disabled
- Network Security Groups with unrestricted inbound rules (0.0.0.0/0 on sensitive ports)
- App Services without HTTPS enforcement
- Virtual Machines without disk encryption
- Public IP addresses on resources that should be private
- Missing diagnostic settings / logging
- Resources deployed without managed identity
### Step 3: Deep Analysis
For each Bicep file, perform contextual analysis beyond pattern matching:
1. **Parameter defaults** — Check if security-sensitive parameters have insecure defaults
2. **Conditional deployments** — Verify security controls aren't conditionally skipped
3. **Module references** — Trace module calls to ensure child modules are also secure
4. **Output exposure** — Flag any outputs that leak secrets, connection strings, or keys
5. **API versions** — Flag deprecated API versions that may lack security features
### Step 4: Generate Report
Produce a findings report organized by severity:
#### Severity Levels
| Level | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| 🔴 Critical | Immediate risk — public exposure, missing encryption at rest, credential leakage |
| 🟠 High | Significant risk — overly permissive network rules, disabled logging |
| 🟡 Medium | Moderate risk — missing best practices, insecure defaults |
| 🔵 Low | Informational — optimization opportunities, minor hardening |
#### Report Format
For each finding:
```
### [SEVERITY] Finding Title
**Resource**: `resource.symbolicName` (resource type)
**File**: `path/to/file.bicep` (line N)
**Issue**: Description of the security concern
**Risk**: What could go wrong if unaddressed
**Remediation**:
\`\`\`bicep
// Corrected configuration
resource storageAccount 'Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts@2023-01-01' = {
properties: {
supportsHttpsTrafficOnly: true
allowBlobPublicAccess: false
}
}
\`\`\`
```
### Step 5: Offer Remediation
After presenting findings, offer to apply fixes directly to the Bicep files using the Edit tool. Group fixes by file and apply them in order.
## Security Rules Reference
### Storage Accounts
- `supportsHttpsTrafficOnly` must be `true`
- `allowBlobPublicAccess` must be `false`
- `minimumTlsVersion` must be `TLS1_2`
- `networkAcls.defaultAction` should be `Deny`
- Encryption with customer-managed keys for sensitive data
### Key Vault
- `enableSoftDelete` must be `true`
- `enablePurgeProtection` must be `true`
- `enableRbacAuthorization` should be `true`
- Network ACLs should restrict access
### SQL / Database
- `minimalTlsVersion` must be `1.2`
- Auditing and threat detection must be enabled
- Transparent Data Encryption must be enabled
- Azure AD admin should be configured
### App Service / Function App
- `httpsOnly` must be `true`
- `minTlsVersion` must be `1.2`
- Managed identity should be enabled
- `ftpsState` should be `Disabled` or `FtpsOnly`
### Network Security Groups
- No inbound `Allow` rules from `*` or `0.0.0.0/0` to ports 22, 3389, 1433, 3306, 5432
- Deny-all rules should be present as the lowest priority
### Virtual Machines
- OS disk encryption must be enabled
- Managed identity should be used instead of credentials
- Boot diagnostics should be enabled
## Boundaries
- Do NOT modify files without user consent
- Do NOT execute Bicep deployments
- Do NOT access Azure subscriptions or resource groups
- Focus only on static analysis of Bicep template content
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!